Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_transition_challenge

null

2026-02-23T05:21:46.298480

3.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept about transitional difficulties between economic systems, but it's somewhat broad and could benefit from more specificity about what constitutes these "difficulties and obstacles." The term "fundamental changes" is vague and could encompass many different types of economic shifts.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	While Smith does discuss different economic systems (ancient vs. modern), the text doesn't explicitly focus on transition challenges as a distinct analytical concept. This appears to be an inference drawn from Smith's comparative analysis rather than a concept he directly articulates or emphasizes.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would apply broadly across different economic arrangements and policy contexts. The systemic nature of transition challenges makes it a good fit for theoretical rather than applied domains.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how systems adapt to fundamental environmental or structural changes. It also has relevance to S5 (identity/policy) since transitions often involve shifts in system identity and governing principles.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	3.0	5.0	The concept has moderate explanatory value in understanding why economic reforms face resistance and implementation difficulties, but it remains somewhat descriptive rather than revealing specific mechanisms. It identifies a phenomenon but doesn't deeply illuminate the underlying structural dynamics Smith analyzes.

Evaluation: Economic System Transition Challenge

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept about transitional difficulties between economic systems, but it's somewhat broad and could benefit from more specificity about what constitutes these "difficulties and obstacles." The term "fundamental changes" is vague and could encompass many different types of economic shifts.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss different economic systems (ancient vs. modern), the text doesn't explicitly focus on transition challenges as a distinct analytical concept. This appears to be an inference drawn from Smith's comparative analysis rather than a concept he directly articulates or emphasizes.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would apply broadly across different economic arrangements and policy contexts. The systemic nature of transition challenges makes it a good fit for theoretical rather than applied domains.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how systems adapt to fundamental environmental or structural changes. It also has relevance to S5 (identity/policy) since transitions often involve shifts in system identity and governing principles.

explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0

The concept has moderate explanatory value in understanding why economic reforms face resistance and implementation difficulties, but it remains somewhat descriptive rather than revealing specific mechanisms. It identifies a phenomenon but doesn't deeply illuminate the underlying structural dynamics Smith analyzes.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History