Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

funded_debt

null

2026-02-23T05:32:35.532124

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes funded debt from other forms of government borrowing by specifying that it involves dedicated revenue streams or taxes assigned for repayment. This creates a precise conceptual boundary, though it could be slightly more specific about the institutional mechanisms involved.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly analyzes funded debt as a distinct stage in government borrowing practices. The entity accurately reflects Smith's own terminology and analytical framework.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as funded debt represents a specific regulatory and institutional mechanism for managing government finances and public credit. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of governmental financial administration.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a control mechanism for managing government financial obligations, and potentially to S2 (coordination) as it coordinates revenue streams with debt obligations. The institutional nature makes it naturally VSM-relevant.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The concept illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance, explaining how governments can credibly commit to debt repayment through institutional arrangements. It reveals the evolution from ad hoc borrowing to systematic debt management, providing genuine insight into fiscal governance.

Evaluation: Funded Debt

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes funded debt from other forms of government borrowing by specifying that it involves dedicated revenue streams or taxes assigned for repayment. This creates a precise conceptual boundary, though it could be slightly more specific about the institutional mechanisms involved.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly analyzes funded debt as a distinct stage in government borrowing practices. The entity accurately reflects Smith's own terminology and analytical framework.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as funded debt represents a specific regulatory and institutional mechanism for managing government finances and public credit. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of governmental financial administration.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a control mechanism for managing government financial obligations, and potentially to S2 (coordination) as it coordinates revenue streams with debt obligations. The institutional nature makes it naturally VSM-relevant.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The concept illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance, explaining how governments can credibly commit to debt repayment through institutional arrangements. It reveals the evolution from ad hoc borrowing to systematic debt management, providing genuine insight into fiscal governance.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History