Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/landlord_s_share.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.4 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
landlord_s_share null 2026-02-23T05:40:42.734820 4.0
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 4.0 5.0 The definition clearly distinguishes the landlord's share from wages and profits, and specifies it as the portion going to rent after production costs. It could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "necessary costs of production" but is otherwise well-defined.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 5.0 5.0 This concept is thoroughly grounded in Book I, Chapter 11 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith extensively analyzes rent as a component of price and examines how landlords' returns vary with land productivity. The entity accurately reflects Smith's tripartite division of produce among rent, wages, and profit.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 5.0 5.0 "Distribution" is the correct domain assignment, as this entity directly concerns how the total product is divided among the three classes (landlords, laborers, and capitalists). This is a core distributional concept in Smith's framework.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 2.0 5.0 This entity represents a distributional outcome rather than a systemic function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might relate tangentially to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how surplus is allocated, it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 4.0 5.0 The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating how agricultural surplus is distributed and how rent functions as a residual claim on land productivity. It helps explain the structural relationship between land quality, cultivation efficiency, and distributional outcomes.

Evaluation: Landlord S Share

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes the landlord's share from wages and profits, and specifies it as the portion going to rent after production costs. It could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "necessary costs of production" but is otherwise well-defined.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is thoroughly grounded in Book I, Chapter 11 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith extensively analyzes rent as a component of price and examines how landlords' returns vary with land productivity. The entity accurately reflects Smith's tripartite division of produce among rent, wages, and profit.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Distribution" is the correct domain assignment, as this entity directly concerns how the total product is divided among the three classes (landlords, laborers, and capitalists). This is a core distributional concept in Smith's framework.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity represents a distributional outcome rather than a systemic function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might relate tangentially to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how surplus is allocated, it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating how agricultural surplus is distributed and how rent functions as a residual claim on land productivity. It helps explain the structural relationship between land quality, cultivation efficiency, and distributional outcomes.