Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

monopoly_effects_on_prices

null

2026-02-23T05:55:22.573917

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes monopoly effects from monopoly itself, focusing specifically on price consequences and efficiency impacts. It avoids circularity and identifies distinct mechanisms (higher prices, reduced efficiency incentives) rather than using vague terms.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 2, where he extensively discusses how import restrictions create domestic monopolies that raise prices and harm consumers. The entity accurately reflects Smith's core argument about the welfare effects of trade protection.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"Distribution" is appropriate since this concerns how monopoly power affects the distribution of economic benefits between producers and consumers. The concept could also fit in "Market Structure" but Distribution captures the welfare transfer aspect that Smith emphasizes.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as it describes how market structures affect system responsiveness to environmental signals. It also touches S3 (regulation) regarding internal market control mechanisms.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the causal mechanism between market structure and economic outcomes. It explains not just that monopolies exist, but how they systematically distort price signals and efficiency incentives in Smith's framework.

Evaluation: Monopoly Effects On Prices

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes monopoly effects from monopoly itself, focusing specifically on price consequences and efficiency impacts. It avoids circularity and identifies distinct mechanisms (higher prices, reduced efficiency incentives) rather than using vague terms.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 2, where he extensively discusses how import restrictions create domestic monopolies that raise prices and harm consumers. The entity accurately reflects Smith's core argument about the welfare effects of trade protection.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"Distribution" is appropriate since this concerns how monopoly power affects the distribution of economic benefits between producers and consumers. The concept could also fit in "Market Structure" but Distribution captures the welfare transfer aspect that Smith emphasizes.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as it describes how market structures affect system responsiveness to environmental signals. It also touches S3 (regulation) regarding internal market control mechanisms.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the causal mechanism between market structure and economic outcomes. It explains not just that monopolies exist, but how they systematically distort price signals and efficiency incentives in Smith's framework.

3.4 KiB Raw Blame History