Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/stock_of_the_farmer.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.3 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
stock_of_the_farmer null 2026-02-23T06:26:10.821276 4.4
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 4.0 5.0 The definition clearly identifies specific components (implements, animals, provisions) and distinguishes this as capital investment rather than just any farm resources. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept of productive capital in agriculture.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 5.0 5.0 This entity is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book I, Chapter 6, where he explicitly addresses how agricultural prices must compensate for the farmer's capital investment in implements and livestock. The concept emerges naturally from Smith's analysis rather than being imposed.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 5.0 5.0 Placement in the "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this represents capital formation and investment in productive assets. The farmer's stock is a clear example of accumulated capital being deployed for future production.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 4.0 5.0 This entity maps well to S1 (primary operations) as the basic productive resources of agricultural operations, and potentially to S3 (internal regulation) regarding capital maintenance and replacement decisions. It has clear operational relevance within the VSM framework.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 4.0 5.0 The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's economic theory—how capital investment creates claims on output that must be satisfied through pricing. It explains the structural relationship between capital deployment and price formation in agriculture.

Evaluation: Stock Of The Farmer

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly identifies specific components (implements, animals, provisions) and distinguishes this as capital investment rather than just any farm resources. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept of productive capital in agriculture.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book I, Chapter 6, where he explicitly addresses how agricultural prices must compensate for the farmer's capital investment in implements and livestock. The concept emerges naturally from Smith's analysis rather than being imposed.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

Placement in the "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this represents capital formation and investment in productive assets. The farmer's stock is a clear example of accumulated capital being deployed for future production.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S1 (primary operations) as the basic productive resources of agricultural operations, and potentially to S3 (internal regulation) regarding capital maintenance and replacement decisions. It has clear operational relevance within the VSM framework.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's economic theory—how capital investment creates claims on output that must be satisfied through pricing. It explains the structural relationship between capital deployment and price formation in agriculture.