Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

tontines

null

2026-02-23T06:32:15.268877

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	5.0	5.0	The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly explaining the specific mechanism of tontines where survivors inherit deceased participants' annuities until one person receives all payments. It captures a distinct financial instrument rather than a vague concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of tontines in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly analyzes them as a government revenue method and explains the psychological factors that make them profitable for governments. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the topic.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"Regulation" is appropriate since tontines are a government policy tool for raising revenue, but "Public Finance" or "Government Revenue" might be more precise domains. The placement is reasonable given the regulatory framework required for such schemes.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	Tontines map moderately well to S3 (internal regulation) as a government revenue collection mechanism, and potentially to S4 (intelligence) regarding how governments adapt their financing methods. However, the mapping is not as natural as for core operational or regulatory concepts.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating a specific mechanism of government finance and revealing Smith's insights about how psychological biases (overestimating longevity) can be leveraged for public revenue. It demonstrates concrete policy implementation rather than just naming a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Tontines

definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0

The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly explaining the specific mechanism of tontines where survivors inherit deceased participants' annuities until one person receives all payments. It captures a distinct financial instrument rather than a vague concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of tontines in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly analyzes them as a government revenue method and explains the psychological factors that make them profitable for governments. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the topic.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is appropriate since tontines are a government policy tool for raising revenue, but "Public Finance" or "Government Revenue" might be more precise domains. The placement is reasonable given the regulatory framework required for such schemes.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Tontines map moderately well to S3 (internal regulation) as a government revenue collection mechanism, and potentially to S4 (intelligence) regarding how governments adapt their financing methods. However, the mapping is not as natural as for core operational or regulatory concepts.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating a specific mechanism of government finance and revealing Smith's insights about how psychological biases (overestimating longevity) can be leveraged for public revenue. It demonstrates concrete policy implementation rather than just naming a surface phenomenon.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History