Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.5 KiB
entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
| entity_slug | evaluator | evaluated_at | overall_score | scores | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| transportation_cost_differential | null | 2026-02-23T06:33:33.461698 | 4.4 |
|
Evaluation: Transportation Cost Differential
definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes between different transportation modes and their cost implications, with specific focus on water vs. land carriage. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept that directly affects market dynamics.
source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's detailed calculations comparing the resource requirements of different transportation methods (100 men + 400 horses for land vs. 6-8 men + ship for water). The concept emerges naturally from Smith's analysis rather than being imposed from external frameworks.
domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since transportation cost differentials directly determine which goods can be profitably traded and over what distances. This is fundamentally about the mechanics and feasibility of market exchange.
vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has some relevance to S1 (operational constraints on primary activities) and S4 (environmental factors affecting system adaptation), but it's more of an environmental constraint than a core VSM system component. It influences system behavior without being a control mechanism itself.
explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism that determines market extent and specialization patterns. It explains why certain trade relationships exist while others don't, making it a key structural determinant rather than just a surface observation.