Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

value_in_exchange

null

2026-02-23T06:36:26.078722

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes value in exchange from value in use and precisely captures the concept as purchasing power or command over other goods. It avoids circularity by defining exchange value in terms of what can be obtained through trade rather than simply referring back to exchange.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly and explicitly discussed by Smith in Book I, Chapter 4, where he makes the famous distinction between value in use and value in exchange using the water-diamond paradox. The entity accurately reflects Smith's original formulation without adding external interpretations.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept is fundamentally about how goods trade against each other in markets. This is a core mechanism of exchange processes rather than production, distribution, or consumption.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	2.0	5.0	This concept is quite abstract and doesn't map naturally to any specific VSM system - it's more of a fundamental property that emerges from market interactions rather than an operational, coordinative, regulatory, intelligence, or policy function. It operates across multiple VSM levels without being specific to any.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides crucial explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism that drives market exchange - the paradox that utility and exchange value can diverge dramatically. It explains a core structural relation in how markets determine relative prices and purchasing power.

Evaluation: Value In Exchange

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes value in exchange from value in use and precisely captures the concept as purchasing power or command over other goods. It avoids circularity by defining exchange value in terms of what can be obtained through trade rather than simply referring back to exchange.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly and explicitly discussed by Smith in Book I, Chapter 4, where he makes the famous distinction between value in use and value in exchange using the water-diamond paradox. The entity accurately reflects Smith's original formulation without adding external interpretations.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept is fundamentally about how goods trade against each other in markets. This is a core mechanism of exchange processes rather than production, distribution, or consumption.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This concept is quite abstract and doesn't map naturally to any specific VSM system - it's more of a fundamental property that emerges from market interactions rather than an operational, coordinative, regulatory, intelligence, or policy function. It operates across multiple VSM levels without being specific to any.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides crucial explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism that drives market exchange - the paradox that utility and exchange value can diverge dramatically. It explains a core structural relation in how markets determine relative prices and purchasing power.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History