tegwick
41773f1320
Add OpenAIAdapter for the OpenAI chat completions API (apikey-chatgpt.txt or OPENAI_API_KEY). Set default model to arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free for the infospace pipeline and increase max_tokens from 4096 to 8192. Reprocess chapter 05 with Trinity Large (was Gemini: 1 truncated entity, now 19 complete entities). Process chapters 06 (Aurora Alpha, 10 entities) and 07 (Trinity Large, 15 entities including regenerated violent-policy.md). Canonical set now at 85 unique entities. Add entity archive policy: entities are never silently deleted. Retired entities move to output/entities/archive/ with a dated reason header. New CLI option: --archive-entity <slug> --reason "...". The --list output shows the archive count alongside the canonical set. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.5 KiB
Violent Policy
Definition
A "violent policy" refers to government interventions that forcibly distort market prices by preventing them from naturally gravitating toward their equilibrium level. These policies include monopolies, trade restrictions, exclusive privileges, statutes of apprenticeship, and poor laws that artificially constrain competition and supply.
Source Chapter
Book 1, Chapter 7
Context
Smith introduces this concept while explaining how market prices naturally fluctuate around the natural price due to supply and demand dynamics. He argues that when governments implement policies that restrict competition or artificially limit supply, they prevent the market from reaching its natural equilibrium, creating persistent price distortions that harm economic efficiency.
Economic Domain
Regulation
Smith's Original Wording
"The monopolists, by keeping the market constantly understocked, by never fully supplying the effectual demand, sell their commodities much above the natural price, and raise their emoluments, whether they consist in wages or profit, greatly above their natural rate."
Modern Interpretation
This concept maps directly to modern critiques of rent-seeking behavior and regulatory capture, where special interests lobby for government policies that create artificial scarcity, maintain barriers to entry, and extract economic rents above competitive market levels. Contemporary examples include occupational licensing, protectionist trade policies, and regulations that favor incumbent firms over new market entrants.