Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/agricultural_improvement_discouragement.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.8 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
agricultural_improvement_discouragement null 2026-02-23T00:27:04.714138 4.4
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 4.0 5.0 The definition is quite precise, clearly identifying specific institutional barriers (primogeniture, entails, servile labor, etc.) and their mechanism of preventing farmers from capturing improvement value. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than a vague concept.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 5.0 5.0 This entity is directly grounded in Smith's central thesis from Book III, Chapter 2, where he systematically analyzes how feudal institutions created barriers to agricultural development. The specific mechanisms listed (primogeniture, entails, insecure tenure, etc.) are explicitly discussed by Smith in this context.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 5.0 5.0 The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as this entity deals with factors affecting agricultural productivity and investment in productive improvements. It fits naturally within Smith's analysis of what determines productive capacity in different economic systems.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 3.0 5.0 This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents institutional failures that prevent the economic system from adapting and improving agricultural practices. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding how institutional structures govern productive activities.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 5.0 5.0 This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating the structural mechanisms through which feudal institutions systematically discouraged productive investment. It explains a key causal relationship in Smith's theory of why European agriculture stagnated after the fall of Rome.

Evaluation: Agricultural Improvement Discouragement

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is quite precise, clearly identifying specific institutional barriers (primogeniture, entails, servile labor, etc.) and their mechanism of preventing farmers from capturing improvement value. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than a vague concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's central thesis from Book III, Chapter 2, where he systematically analyzes how feudal institutions created barriers to agricultural development. The specific mechanisms listed (primogeniture, entails, insecure tenure, etc.) are explicitly discussed by Smith in this context.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as this entity deals with factors affecting agricultural productivity and investment in productive improvements. It fits naturally within Smith's analysis of what determines productive capacity in different economic systems.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents institutional failures that prevent the economic system from adapting and improving agricultural practices. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding how institutional structures govern productive activities.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating the structural mechanisms through which feudal institutions systematically discouraged productive investment. It explains a key causal relationship in Smith's theory of why European agriculture stagnated after the fall of Rome.