Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

agricultural_stock

null

2026-02-23T00:31:37.912327

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly specifies what constitutes agricultural stock (livestock, implements, seeds, materials) and distinguishes it from other forms of capital by its agricultural purpose and need for renewal. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book I, Chapter 11, where he extensively analyzes agricultural capital, its maintenance requirements, and the returns necessary to sustain farming operations. The entity accurately reflects Smith's treatment of agricultural investment.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Production" is the correct domain placement since agricultural stock represents the physical and material inputs essential for productive farming activities. This aligns perfectly with Smith's analysis of productive capital in agricultural contexts.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	Agricultural stock maps naturally to S1 (primary operations) as the fundamental productive capacity, with clear connections to S3 (internal regulation) regarding stock maintenance and renewal requirements. It represents concrete operational infrastructure rather than abstract coordination.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity illuminates the structural mechanism by which agricultural production requires continuous capital investment and renewal, explaining how farming operations must generate sufficient returns to maintain productive capacity. It reveals the economic logic underlying agricultural sustainability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Agricultural Stock

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly specifies what constitutes agricultural stock (livestock, implements, seeds, materials) and distinguishes it from other forms of capital by its agricultural purpose and need for renewal. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book I, Chapter 11, where he extensively analyzes agricultural capital, its maintenance requirements, and the returns necessary to sustain farming operations. The entity accurately reflects Smith's treatment of agricultural investment.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Production" is the correct domain placement since agricultural stock represents the physical and material inputs essential for productive farming activities. This aligns perfectly with Smith's analysis of productive capital in agricultural contexts.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

Agricultural stock maps naturally to S1 (primary operations) as the fundamental productive capacity, with clear connections to S3 (internal regulation) regarding stock maintenance and renewal requirements. It represents concrete operational infrastructure rather than abstract coordination.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity illuminates the structural mechanism by which agricultural production requires continuous capital investment and renewal, explaining how farming operations must generate sufficient returns to maintain productive capacity. It reveals the economic logic underlying agricultural sustainability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History