Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

bank_capital_adequacy

null

2026-02-23T00:37:07.690141

4.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly articulates bank capital adequacy as the sufficiency of capital relative to risks and obligations, with a specific functional purpose (absorbing losses and maintaining operations). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct financial concept, though it could be slightly more precise about measurement criteria.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	3.0	5.0	While Smith does discuss banking capital and stability in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern regulatory concept of "capital adequacy" as a formal framework may be somewhat anachronistic for Smith's era. The underlying principles are present in Smith's work, but the specific framing reflects later banking theory developments.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as capital adequacy is fundamentally a regulatory concept concerned with prudential oversight and systemic stability. This clearly belongs in the regulatory framework rather than in operational or market domains.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory control mechanism that monitors and maintains system viability. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) in preventing systemic banking disruptions.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the structural relationship between capital reserves, risk management, and banking system stability. It explains a key mechanism for preventing financial system failures rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Bank Capital Adequacy

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly articulates bank capital adequacy as the sufficiency of capital relative to risks and obligations, with a specific functional purpose (absorbing losses and maintaining operations). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct financial concept, though it could be slightly more precise about measurement criteria.

source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss banking capital and stability in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern regulatory concept of "capital adequacy" as a formal framework may be somewhat anachronistic for Smith's era. The underlying principles are present in Smith's work, but the specific framing reflects later banking theory developments.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as capital adequacy is fundamentally a regulatory concept concerned with prudential oversight and systemic stability. This clearly belongs in the regulatory framework rather than in operational or market domains.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory control mechanism that monitors and maintains system viability. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) in preventing systemic banking disruptions.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the structural relationship between capital reserves, risk management, and banking system stability. It explains a key mechanism for preventing financial system failures rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History