Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/bank_monetary_stability.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.3 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
bank_monetary_stability null 2026-02-23T00:43:16.219342 4.0
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 3.0 5.0 The definition captures a meaningful concept about monetary stability but relies on somewhat circular language ("stability requires...stable money"). It distinguishes between stabilizing and destabilizing effects of banking but could be more precise about what constitutes "appropriate regulation."
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 4.0 5.0 Smith does examine banking stability extensively in Book II, Chapter 2, discussing how banks can either support or disrupt economic activity through their money creation and credit policies. The concept aligns well with his analysis of banking's role in economic development.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 5.0 5.0 "Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as Smith's discussion focuses on the regulatory and institutional conditions necessary for banks to contribute positively to economic stability rather than cause disruption.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 4.0 5.0 This entity maps well to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) as it concerns preventing monetary instability that could cause economic oscillations, and partially to S3 (internal regulation) regarding prudent bank management and oversight mechanisms.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 4.0 5.0 The entity illuminates an important structural relationship between banking practices and broader economic stability, explaining how monetary institutions can either amplify or dampen economic fluctuations. This goes beyond surface description to identify a key systemic mechanism.

Evaluation: Bank Monetary Stability

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a meaningful concept about monetary stability but relies on somewhat circular language ("stability requires...stable money"). It distinguishes between stabilizing and destabilizing effects of banking but could be more precise about what constitutes "appropriate regulation."

source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

Smith does examine banking stability extensively in Book II, Chapter 2, discussing how banks can either support or disrupt economic activity through their money creation and credit policies. The concept aligns well with his analysis of banking's role in economic development.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as Smith's discussion focuses on the regulatory and institutional conditions necessary for banks to contribute positively to economic stability rather than cause disruption.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) as it concerns preventing monetary instability that could cause economic oscillations, and partially to S3 (internal regulation) regarding prudent bank management and oversight mechanisms.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important structural relationship between banking practices and broader economic stability, explaining how monetary institutions can either amplify or dampen economic fluctuations. This goes beyond surface description to identify a key systemic mechanism.