Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

capital_employment_security_gradient

null

2026-02-23T04:40:54.516689

4.6

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly articulates a spectrum of security levels across different capital employment types, with specific examples and clear ordering from most to least secure. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could benefit from more precise criteria for what constitutes "security" in this context.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses how different forms of capital employment carry varying degrees of security and risk. Smith clearly establishes this hierarchy and uses it to explain investment preferences and economic development patterns.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The placement in the "Accumulation" domain is highly appropriate, as this gradient directly relates to how capital is accumulated, allocated, and employed across different investment opportunities. This is fundamentally about capital formation and deployment decisions.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic actors assess and respond to environmental risks and opportunities when making capital allocation decisions. It also has some relevance to S1 as it affects primary operational choices.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This concept provides significant explanatory power by revealing the underlying mechanism that drives capital allocation decisions and the natural progression of economic development. It explains why certain investment patterns emerge and persist, making it a valuable analytical tool rather than mere description.

Evaluation: Capital Employment Security Gradient

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly articulates a spectrum of security levels across different capital employment types, with specific examples and clear ordering from most to least secure. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could benefit from more precise criteria for what constitutes "security" in this context.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses how different forms of capital employment carry varying degrees of security and risk. Smith clearly establishes this hierarchy and uses it to explain investment preferences and economic development patterns.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The placement in the "Accumulation" domain is highly appropriate, as this gradient directly relates to how capital is accumulated, allocated, and employed across different investment opportunities. This is fundamentally about capital formation and deployment decisions.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic actors assess and respond to environmental risks and opportunities when making capital allocation decisions. It also has some relevance to S1 as it affects primary operational choices.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept provides significant explanatory power by revealing the underlying mechanism that drives capital allocation decisions and the natural progression of economic development. It explains why certain investment patterns emerge and persist, making it a valuable analytical tool rather than mere description.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History