Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/certificates.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
certificates null 2026-02-23T04:42:30.141234 4.6
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 5.0 5.0 The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly specifying that certificates are official documents from one parish allowing residence in another without gaining settlement rights. It captures a distinct administrative mechanism rather than a vague concept.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 5.0 5.0 This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 10, where he explicitly discusses certificates as part of his analysis of settlement laws and their effects on labor mobility. The concept emerges naturally from Smith's own discussion rather than being imposed externally.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 5.0 5.0 The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as certificates represent a regulatory mechanism designed to manage the administrative problems created by settlement laws. This is clearly a matter of institutional regulation rather than production, exchange, or other economic domains.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 4.0 5.0 This entity maps well to S2 (coordination) as certificates serve to coordinate labor movement between parishes and reduce oscillations/conflicts in the settlement system. It also has some S3 (internal regulation) characteristics as an administrative control mechanism.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 4.0 5.0 The entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating how administrative systems attempt to solve problems created by other regulations, showing the layered complexity of institutional responses. However, it represents more of a symptomatic response than a fundamental structural mechanism.

Evaluation: Certificates

definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0

The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly specifying that certificates are official documents from one parish allowing residence in another without gaining settlement rights. It captures a distinct administrative mechanism rather than a vague concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 10, where he explicitly discusses certificates as part of his analysis of settlement laws and their effects on labor mobility. The concept emerges naturally from Smith's own discussion rather than being imposed externally.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as certificates represent a regulatory mechanism designed to manage the administrative problems created by settlement laws. This is clearly a matter of institutional regulation rather than production, exchange, or other economic domains.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S2 (coordination) as certificates serve to coordinate labor movement between parishes and reduce oscillations/conflicts in the settlement system. It also has some S3 (internal regulation) characteristics as an administrative control mechanism.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating how administrative systems attempt to solve problems created by other regulations, showing the layered complexity of institutional responses. However, it represents more of a symptomatic response than a fundamental structural mechanism.