Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

4.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colonial_economic_autonomy

null

2026-02-23T04:44:58.426949

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly articulates colonial economic autonomy as self-determination in economic affairs with specific examples (trade freedom, local policies, benefit retention). It avoids circularity and distinguishes this concept from mere political independence by focusing specifically on economic decision-making capacity.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is strongly grounded in Smith's actual arguments in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses how colonial restrictions limit natural development and argues for allowing colonies to exploit their natural advantages of abundant land and scarce labor. The concept directly reflects Smith's critique of monopoly restrictions on colonial trade.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain placement is precisely correct, as this entity concerns the regulatory framework governing colonial economic activity. Smith's analysis focuses on how regulatory restrictions (monopolies, trade controls) constrain colonial autonomy, making this fundamentally a question of regulatory policy.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to VSM System 1 (primary operations) as it concerns the operational autonomy of colonial economic units, and also connects to System 3 (internal regulation) regarding the degree of local versus external control. The concept has clear structural implications for organizational autonomy within larger economic systems.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which regulatory restrictions constrain economic development—specifically how limiting autonomy prevents colonies from adapting to their natural factor endowments. It explains a key structural relationship between governance arrangements and economic outcomes in Smith's colonial theory.

Evaluation: Colonial Economic Autonomy

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly articulates colonial economic autonomy as self-determination in economic affairs with specific examples (trade freedom, local policies, benefit retention). It avoids circularity and distinguishes this concept from mere political independence by focusing specifically on economic decision-making capacity.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is strongly grounded in Smith's actual arguments in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses how colonial restrictions limit natural development and argues for allowing colonies to exploit their natural advantages of abundant land and scarce labor. The concept directly reflects Smith's critique of monopoly restrictions on colonial trade.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain placement is precisely correct, as this entity concerns the regulatory framework governing colonial economic activity. Smith's analysis focuses on how regulatory restrictions (monopolies, trade controls) constrain colonial autonomy, making this fundamentally a question of regulatory policy.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to VSM System 1 (primary operations) as it concerns the operational autonomy of colonial economic units, and also connects to System 3 (internal regulation) regarding the degree of local versus external control. The concept has clear structural implications for organizational autonomy within larger economic systems.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which regulatory restrictions constrain economic development—specifically how limiting autonomy prevents colonies from adapting to their natural factor endowments. It explains a key structural relationship between governance arrangements and economic outcomes in Smith's colonial theory.

4.1 KiB Raw Blame History