Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colonial_economic_development_constraints

null

2026-02-23T04:45:15.565752

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly identifies specific types of limitations (restricted trade access, controlled production, limited market opportunities) and distinguishes between artificial constraints versus natural development trajectories. The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive analysis in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he systematically critiques colonial monopoly policies and their constraining effects on economic development. Smith explicitly argues that these artificial limitations prevent colonies from achieving their natural prosperity.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	The "Production" domain is appropriate since these constraints directly affect how colonies can organize and scale their productive activities. However, it could also reasonably fit in a "Trade" or "Policy" domain given the regulatory nature of the constraints.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents external policy constraints that limit a system's ability to adapt and respond to market opportunities. It also relates to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how external controls override internal economic coordination.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides strong explanatory power by identifying the structural mechanism through which monopoly policies systematically undermine colonial economic potential. It illuminates the causal relationship between policy design and developmental outcomes rather than merely describing surface phenomena.

Evaluation: Colonial Economic Development Constraints

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly identifies specific types of limitations (restricted trade access, controlled production, limited market opportunities) and distinguishes between artificial constraints versus natural development trajectories. The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive analysis in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he systematically critiques colonial monopoly policies and their constraining effects on economic development. Smith explicitly argues that these artificial limitations prevent colonies from achieving their natural prosperity.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

The "Production" domain is appropriate since these constraints directly affect how colonies can organize and scale their productive activities. However, it could also reasonably fit in a "Trade" or "Policy" domain given the regulatory nature of the constraints.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents external policy constraints that limit a system's ability to adapt and respond to market opportunities. It also relates to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how external controls override internal economic coordination.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides strong explanatory power by identifying the structural mechanism through which monopoly policies systematically undermine colonial economic potential. It illuminates the causal relationship between policy design and developmental outcomes rather than merely describing surface phenomena.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History