Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colonial_economic_freedom

null

2026-02-23T04:45:50.750397

3.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept but relies on somewhat circular language ("absence of artificial restrictions" and "unrestricted market access"). While it identifies key components (free trade, autonomy, market access), the boundaries between "artificial" and legitimate restrictions remain unclear.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	4.0	5.0	This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual arguments about colonial policy in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly advocates for removing trade restrictions and allowing colonies greater economic autonomy. The concept directly reflects Smith's critique of mercantile colonial control.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this concept fundamentally concerns the presence or absence of regulatory constraints on colonial economic activity. It fits naturally within discussions of government intervention and market regulation.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	2.0	5.0	This entity is too abstract and normative to map clearly to specific VSM systems—it describes an idealized state rather than operational mechanisms. While it might relate to S4 (environmental adaptation) or S5 (policy), it doesn't represent a functional system component.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying the structural relationship between regulatory constraints and colonial development outcomes. It illuminates Smith's core mechanism linking freedom from artificial restrictions to economic prosperity.

Evaluation: Colonial Economic Freedom

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept but relies on somewhat circular language ("absence of artificial restrictions" and "unrestricted market access"). While it identifies key components (free trade, autonomy, market access), the boundaries between "artificial" and legitimate restrictions remain unclear.

source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual arguments about colonial policy in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly advocates for removing trade restrictions and allowing colonies greater economic autonomy. The concept directly reflects Smith's critique of mercantile colonial control.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this concept fundamentally concerns the presence or absence of regulatory constraints on colonial economic activity. It fits naturally within discussions of government intervention and market regulation.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity is too abstract and normative to map clearly to specific VSM systems—it describes an idealized state rather than operational mechanisms. While it might relate to S4 (environmental adaptation) or S5 (policy), it doesn't represent a functional system component.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying the structural relationship between regulatory constraints and colonial development outcomes. It illuminates Smith's core mechanism linking freedom from artificial restrictions to economic prosperity.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History