Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.9 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colonial_economic_interdependence

null

2026-02-23T04:46:16.272270

4.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept of mutual economic relationships between colonies and other regions, but uses somewhat vague terms like "mutual economic relationships" and "greater interdependence" without specifying clear boundaries or mechanisms. The definition could be more precise about what constitutes interdependence versus simple trade.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	4.0	5.0	This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual arguments about colonial trade policy, particularly his critique of monopolistic restrictions and advocacy for open trade relationships. The context accurately reflects Smith's position that artificial trade restrictions harm colonial development.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate for this concept, as colonial economic interdependence fundamentally concerns trade relationships, capital flows, and economic exchanges between different regions. This is clearly an exchange-based phenomenon rather than production, distribution, or consumption.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how colonial economies adapt to and integrate with broader global market environments. It also has relevance to S1 (primary operations) in terms of actual trade flows and economic activities.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which colonies develop economically via integration with global markets rather than isolation. It explains why Smith opposed monopolistic colonial policies and helps understand his broader theory of economic development through specialization and trade.

Evaluation: Colonial Economic Interdependence

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept of mutual economic relationships between colonies and other regions, but uses somewhat vague terms like "mutual economic relationships" and "greater interdependence" without specifying clear boundaries or mechanisms. The definition could be more precise about what constitutes interdependence versus simple trade.

source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual arguments about colonial trade policy, particularly his critique of monopolistic restrictions and advocacy for open trade relationships. The context accurately reflects Smith's position that artificial trade restrictions harm colonial development.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate for this concept, as colonial economic interdependence fundamentally concerns trade relationships, capital flows, and economic exchanges between different regions. This is clearly an exchange-based phenomenon rather than production, distribution, or consumption.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how colonial economies adapt to and integrate with broader global market environments. It also has relevance to S1 (primary operations) in terms of actual trade flows and economic activities.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which colonies develop economically via integration with global markets rather than isolation. It explains why Smith opposed monopolistic colonial policies and helps understand his broader theory of economic development through specialization and trade.

3.9 KiB Raw Blame History