Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colonial_economic_system_governance

null

2026-02-23T04:48:55.734243

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes governance structures from the economic policies themselves, focusing on the "how" of policy-making and administration. It avoids circularity and identifies specific components (legislative bodies, administrative agencies, enforcement mechanisms).

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	4.0	5.0	Smith does analyze colonial governance structures in Book IV, Chapter 7, particularly critiquing monopoly-based systems and their governance failures. The entity accurately reflects his arguments about accountability deficits and the potential benefits of more open, participatory arrangements.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since this entity concerns the institutional mechanisms that create and enforce economic rules rather than the substantive policies themselves. It sits at the intersection of institutional design and regulatory implementation.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	5.0	5.0	This entity maps clearly to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it deals with governance structures that monitor and control economic operations. It also has connections to S5 (identity/policy) regarding how colonial systems establish and maintain their governing frameworks.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism—how the quality of governance institutions affects economic outcomes in colonial systems. It provides analytical leverage for understanding why some colonial arrangements succeed while others fail, beyond just examining their policies.

Evaluation: Colonial Economic System Governance

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes governance structures from the economic policies themselves, focusing on the "how" of policy-making and administration. It avoids circularity and identifies specific components (legislative bodies, administrative agencies, enforcement mechanisms).

source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

Smith does analyze colonial governance structures in Book IV, Chapter 7, particularly critiquing monopoly-based systems and their governance failures. The entity accurately reflects his arguments about accountability deficits and the potential benefits of more open, participatory arrangements.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since this entity concerns the institutional mechanisms that create and enforce economic rules rather than the substantive policies themselves. It sits at the intersection of institutional design and regulatory implementation.

vsm_relevance — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity maps clearly to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it deals with governance structures that monitor and control economic operations. It also has connections to S5 (identity/policy) regarding how colonial systems establish and maintain their governing frameworks.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism—how the quality of governance institutions affects economic outcomes in colonial systems. It provides analytical leverage for understanding why some colonial arrangements succeed while others fail, beyond just examining their policies.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History