Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.8 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

commercial_system_enrichment_mechanism

null

2026-02-23T05:00:00.803880

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly articulates the specific mercantilist mechanism involving precious metals accumulation through trade surpluses and government intervention. It avoids circularity and identifies distinct policy tools (tariffs, bounties, monopolies) that constitute the mechanism.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive critique of mercantilism throughout Book IV, Chapter 3, where he systematically examines how mercantilist policies aim to achieve national enrichment through the described mechanisms. The entity accurately reflects Smith's characterization of mercantilist theory and practice.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents a comprehensive theoretical framework that mercantilists used to justify various specific policies. It operates at the level of overarching economic doctrine rather than particular mechanisms or applications.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity maps primarily to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents a flawed national strategy for responding to international economic competition. However, it's somewhat abstract as a theoretical framework rather than an operational system component.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides excellent explanatory power by identifying the core logic that unified diverse mercantilist policies, helping explain why Smith viewed these seemingly disparate interventions as manifestations of a single misguided theoretical framework. It illuminates the structural relationship between mercantilist theory and policy practice.

Evaluation: Commercial System Enrichment Mechanism

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly articulates the specific mercantilist mechanism involving precious metals accumulation through trade surpluses and government intervention. It avoids circularity and identifies distinct policy tools (tariffs, bounties, monopolies) that constitute the mechanism.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive critique of mercantilism throughout Book IV, Chapter 3, where he systematically examines how mercantilist policies aim to achieve national enrichment through the described mechanisms. The entity accurately reflects Smith's characterization of mercantilist theory and practice.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents a comprehensive theoretical framework that mercantilists used to justify various specific policies. It operates at the level of overarching economic doctrine rather than particular mechanisms or applications.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity maps primarily to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents a flawed national strategy for responding to international economic competition. However, it's somewhat abstract as a theoretical framework rather than an operational system component.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides excellent explanatory power by identifying the core logic that unified diverse mercantilist policies, helping explain why Smith viewed these seemingly disparate interventions as manifestations of a single misguided theoretical framework. It illuminates the structural relationship between mercantilist theory and policy practice.

3.8 KiB Raw Blame History