Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_geography_determinism

null

2026-02-23T05:10:29.821204

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes between geographical features determining economic patterns versus merely influencing them, and specifies the mechanisms (market extent, division of labour). The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This directly reflects Smith's explicit argument in Book I, Chapter 3 about how water-carriage determines the initial location of industry and the sequence of economic development from coastal to inland areas. The deterministic framing accurately captures Smith's strong causal claims.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"General Theory" is the correct domain placement as this represents a fundamental theoretical principle about how geography shapes economic development patterns, rather than a specific mechanism or policy application.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems must adapt to and work within geographical constraints and opportunities. It represents a key environmental factor that shapes system viability.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This provides genuine explanatory power by identifying geography as a structural determinant of economic possibilities, helping explain why certain development patterns emerge and why market extent varies systematically across locations.

Evaluation: Economic Geography Determinism

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes between geographical features determining economic patterns versus merely influencing them, and specifies the mechanisms (market extent, division of labour). The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This directly reflects Smith's explicit argument in Book I, Chapter 3 about how water-carriage determines the initial location of industry and the sequence of economic development from coastal to inland areas. The deterministic framing accurately captures Smith's strong causal claims.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is the correct domain placement as this represents a fundamental theoretical principle about how geography shapes economic development patterns, rather than a specific mechanism or policy application.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems must adapt to and work within geographical constraints and opportunities. It represents a key environmental factor that shapes system viability.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This provides genuine explanatory power by identifying geography as a structural determinant of economic possibilities, helping explain why certain development patterns emerge and why market extent varies systematically across locations.

3.1 KiB Raw Blame History