Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_adaptability.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.3 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
economic_system_adaptability null 2026-02-23T05:12:23.553622 3.2
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 3.0 5.0 The definition captures a coherent concept about systems adjusting to change, but uses somewhat vague terms like "changing circumstances" and "remain effective." It's reasonably precise but could be more specific about what constitutes adaptability versus mere change.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 2.0 5.0 While Smith does discuss how different systems suit different nations and ages, the specific concept of "adaptability" as a systematic capacity is more of an interpretive extrapolation than something Smith explicitly theorizes. The source grounding is weak and relies heavily on inference.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 4.0 5.0 "General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would apply across Smith's various economic discussions rather than being specific to trade, production, or other particular domains. The placement correctly recognizes its broad theoretical nature.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 5.0 5.0 This entity maps very naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) in the VSM, which is precisely concerned with how systems adapt to environmental changes and maintain viability over time. It's a clear VSM fit rather than being too abstract.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 2.0 5.0 While adaptability is important, this entity primarily names a desirable property rather than explaining the mechanisms by which economic systems actually adapt. It lacks specificity about the structural relations or processes that enable adaptation.

Evaluation: Economic System Adaptability

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept about systems adjusting to change, but uses somewhat vague terms like "changing circumstances" and "remain effective." It's reasonably precise but could be more specific about what constitutes adaptability versus mere change.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss how different systems suit different nations and ages, the specific concept of "adaptability" as a systematic capacity is more of an interpretive extrapolation than something Smith explicitly theorizes. The source grounding is weak and relies heavily on inference.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would apply across Smith's various economic discussions rather than being specific to trade, production, or other particular domains. The placement correctly recognizes its broad theoretical nature.

vsm_relevance — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity maps very naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) in the VSM, which is precisely concerned with how systems adapt to environmental changes and maintain viability over time. It's a clear VSM fit rather than being too abstract.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

While adaptability is important, this entity primarily names a desirable property rather than explaining the mechanisms by which economic systems actually adapt. It lacks specificity about the structural relations or processes that enable adaptation.