Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_diffusion_mechanism

null

2026-02-23T05:14:36.663598

3.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept about how economic systems spread, but it's somewhat broad and could benefit from more specificity about the mechanisms involved. The phrase "processes and channels" is general, though the examples of communication, adoption, and adaptation help clarify the scope.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	While Smith does discuss different economic systems in Book IV, the concept of "diffusion mechanisms" as explicitly defined here appears to be an interpretive overlay rather than something Smith directly articulates. The entity extrapolates beyond what Smith clearly states about how systems spread.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"General Theory" is appropriate for this meta-level concept about how economic arrangements propagate across contexts. This is indeed a theoretical framework concept rather than belonging to a specific economic domain like trade or agriculture.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how systems learn from and adapt successful practices from their environment. It could also relate to S2 (coordination) in terms of how diffusion creates coordination across different contexts.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	3.0	5.0	The concept has moderate explanatory value in understanding how economic innovations spread, but it remains somewhat abstract without identifying specific mechanisms that Smith discusses. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply illuminate the structural relations involved.

Evaluation: Economic System Diffusion Mechanism

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept about how economic systems spread, but it's somewhat broad and could benefit from more specificity about the mechanisms involved. The phrase "processes and channels" is general, though the examples of communication, adoption, and adaptation help clarify the scope.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss different economic systems in Book IV, the concept of "diffusion mechanisms" as explicitly defined here appears to be an interpretive overlay rather than something Smith directly articulates. The entity extrapolates beyond what Smith clearly states about how systems spread.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate for this meta-level concept about how economic arrangements propagate across contexts. This is indeed a theoretical framework concept rather than belonging to a specific economic domain like trade or agriculture.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how systems learn from and adapt successful practices from their environment. It could also relate to S2 (coordination) in terms of how diffusion creates coordination across different contexts.

explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0

The concept has moderate explanatory value in understanding how economic innovations spread, but it remains somewhat abstract without identifying specific mechanisms that Smith discusses. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply illuminate the structural relations involved.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History