Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_innovation_driver

null

2026-02-23T05:17:13.555032

2.6

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	2.0	5.0	The definition is overly broad and umbrella-like, encompassing "factors and forces" without clear boundaries between technological change, understanding, circumstances, and pursuit of outcomes. It lacks precision in distinguishing this concept from general causation or change processes in economics.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	The entity claims to derive from "Book IV, Chapter 0" which doesn't exist (Book IV has 9 chapters), and the context description vaguely references Smith's "discussion of modern systems" without specific textual grounding. This appears to extrapolate beyond what Smith actually discusses about innovation drivers.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	3.0	5.0	"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad conceptual nature, but the entity is so abstract it could fit multiple domains. The placement is reasonable but not particularly illuminating given the entity's vague scope.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it describes forces that drive system evolution and adaptation to changing circumstances. The concept of innovation drivers naturally fits the VSM's emphasis on environmental scanning and adaptive response.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	2.0	5.0	The entity provides minimal explanatory power, functioning more as a label for various change processes rather than illuminating specific mechanisms or structural relations. It doesn't clarify how these drivers actually work or interact within Smith's economic framework.

Evaluation: Economic System Innovation Driver

definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and umbrella-like, encompassing "factors and forces" without clear boundaries between technological change, understanding, circumstances, and pursuit of outcomes. It lacks precision in distinguishing this concept from general causation or change processes in economics.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity claims to derive from "Book IV, Chapter 0" which doesn't exist (Book IV has 9 chapters), and the context description vaguely references Smith's "discussion of modern systems" without specific textual grounding. This appears to extrapolate beyond what Smith actually discusses about innovation drivers.

domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad conceptual nature, but the entity is so abstract it could fit multiple domains. The placement is reasonable but not particularly illuminating given the entity's vague scope.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it describes forces that drive system evolution and adaptation to changing circumstances. The concept of innovation drivers naturally fits the VSM's emphasis on environmental scanning and adaptive response.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity provides minimal explanatory power, functioning more as a label for various change processes rather than illuminating specific mechanisms or structural relations. It doesn't clarify how these drivers actually work or interact within Smith's economic framework.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History