Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_selection

null

2026-02-23T05:20:45.530965

3.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept about choosing economic arrangements, but it's somewhat broad and could apply to many decision-making processes. The phrase "based on their circumstances, objectives, and understanding" is quite general and doesn't specify what makes this selection process distinct from other policy choices.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	While Smith does discuss different systems being appropriate for different nations and ages, the entity appears to extrapolate a formal "selection process" that isn't explicitly theorized in the source text. Smith's observations about system appropriateness don't necessarily constitute a theory of how nations actively choose between systems.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would span across different economic domains rather than belonging to a specific area like trade or taxation. The broad nature of system selection as a meta-level concept supports this placement.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S5 (identity/policy) as it concerns fundamental decisions about a nation's economic identity and governing principles. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) insofar as system selection requires environmental assessment and strategic adaptation.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	2.0	5.0	The entity names a phenomenon but doesn't illuminate the mechanisms by which such selection occurs or the structural relations that govern it. It remains at a high level of abstraction without providing insight into how or why nations actually make these choices.

Evaluation: Economic System Selection

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept about choosing economic arrangements, but it's somewhat broad and could apply to many decision-making processes. The phrase "based on their circumstances, objectives, and understanding" is quite general and doesn't specify what makes this selection process distinct from other policy choices.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss different systems being appropriate for different nations and ages, the entity appears to extrapolate a formal "selection process" that isn't explicitly theorized in the source text. Smith's observations about system appropriateness don't necessarily constitute a theory of how nations actively choose between systems.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would span across different economic domains rather than belonging to a specific area like trade or taxation. The broad nature of system selection as a meta-level concept supports this placement.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S5 (identity/policy) as it concerns fundamental decisions about a nation's economic identity and governing principles. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) insofar as system selection requires environmental assessment and strategic adaptation.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity names a phenomenon but doesn't illuminate the mechanisms by which such selection occurs or the structural relations that govern it. It remains at a high level of abstraction without providing insight into how or why nations actually make these choices.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History