Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_transformation

null

2026-02-23T05:21:36.958939

3.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept of systemic economic change but remains somewhat abstract and general. While it identifies key components (institutions, policies, practices), it could be more precise about what constitutes "fundamental" change versus incremental reform.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	The entity relies heavily on inference from Smith's "distinction between ancient and modern systems" rather than explicit textual discussion of transformation processes. Smith describes different systems but doesn't extensively theorize about the mechanisms or nature of transitions between them.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept spans across Smith's analysis of different economic systems and represents a meta-level theoretical construct. It's not specific to any particular policy area or mechanism.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	5.0	5.0	This entity maps excellently to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic systems adapt to changing circumstances and environments. It also connects to S5 (identity/policy) as transformations involve fundamental changes in systemic identity and organizing principles.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	3.0	5.0	While the concept helps organize thinking about systemic change in Smith's work, it remains at a high level of abstraction without illuminating specific mechanisms of transformation. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply explain how or why such transformations occur.

Evaluation: Economic System Transformation

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept of systemic economic change but remains somewhat abstract and general. While it identifies key components (institutions, policies, practices), it could be more precise about what constitutes "fundamental" change versus incremental reform.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity relies heavily on inference from Smith's "distinction between ancient and modern systems" rather than explicit textual discussion of transformation processes. Smith describes different systems but doesn't extensively theorize about the mechanisms or nature of transitions between them.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept spans across Smith's analysis of different economic systems and represents a meta-level theoretical construct. It's not specific to any particular policy area or mechanism.

vsm_relevance — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity maps excellently to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic systems adapt to changing circumstances and environments. It also connects to S5 (identity/policy) as transformations involve fundamental changes in systemic identity and organizing principles.

explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0

While the concept helps organize thinking about systemic change in Smith's work, it remains at a high level of abstraction without illuminating specific mechanisms of transformation. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply explain how or why such transformations occur.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History