Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

expense_of_justice

null

2026-02-23T05:25:30.012556

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition is precise and captures a distinct concept - the sovereign's specific financial responsibility for maintaining justice administration. It clearly delineates this as protection from "injustice or oppression" rather than using vague terms, though it could be slightly more specific about what constitutes "exact administration."

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book V, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses the sovereign's duty to establish justice administration as the second primary obligation. The language and conceptual framework align closely with Smith's original exposition of sovereign duties.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as this represents the sovereign's regulatory function in establishing and maintaining institutional frameworks for justice. This fits perfectly within the broader category of governmental regulation of social and economic relations.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the system's mechanism for maintaining internal order and ensuring compliance with established rules. It also has elements of S2 (coordination) in preventing conflicts between societal members.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which civil government maintains social order and protects property rights. It reveals the economic logic behind justice administration as a foundational requirement for market functioning, though it could elaborate more on the specific mechanisms involved.

Evaluation: Expense Of Justice

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is precise and captures a distinct concept - the sovereign's specific financial responsibility for maintaining justice administration. It clearly delineates this as protection from "injustice or oppression" rather than using vague terms, though it could be slightly more specific about what constitutes "exact administration."

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book V, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses the sovereign's duty to establish justice administration as the second primary obligation. The language and conceptual framework align closely with Smith's original exposition of sovereign duties.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as this represents the sovereign's regulatory function in establishing and maintaining institutional frameworks for justice. This fits perfectly within the broader category of governmental regulation of social and economic relations.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the system's mechanism for maintaining internal order and ensuring compliance with established rules. It also has elements of S2 (coordination) in preventing conflicts between societal members.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which civil government maintains social order and protects property rights. It reveals the economic logic behind justice administration as a foundational requirement for market functioning, though it could elaborate more on the specific mechanisms involved.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History