Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

ground_expenses

null

2026-02-23T05:34:01.985686

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing ground expenses as landlord-funded improvements (buildings, drains, enclosures) that increase productive capacity and eventual rent returns. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept with specific characteristics.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the agricultural system's classification of "ground expenses" (depenses foncieres) and their treatment as productive investments worthy of tax protection. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as ground expenses directly relate to improving the productive capacity of land through capital investments in infrastructure and ameliorations. This fits perfectly within production economics rather than exchange, distribution, or consumption.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	Ground expenses map reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as they represent fundamental productive infrastructure investments, but the concept is somewhat VSM-neutral since it primarily describes a financial classification rather than a systemic function. The mapping is plausible but not compelling.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism through which landlord investments create a feedback loop between capital improvement, increased productivity, and higher rents. It reveals an important structural relationship in agricultural economics beyond mere surface description.

Evaluation: Ground Expenses

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing ground expenses as landlord-funded improvements (buildings, drains, enclosures) that increase productive capacity and eventual rent returns. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept with specific characteristics.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the agricultural system's classification of "ground expenses" (depenses foncieres) and their treatment as productive investments worthy of tax protection. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as ground expenses directly relate to improving the productive capacity of land through capital investments in infrastructure and ameliorations. This fits perfectly within production economics rather than exchange, distribution, or consumption.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Ground expenses map reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as they represent fundamental productive infrastructure investments, but the concept is somewhat VSM-neutral since it primarily describes a financial classification rather than a systemic function. The mapping is plausible but not compelling.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism through which landlord investments create a feedback loop between capital improvement, increased productivity, and higher rents. It reveals an important structural relationship in agricultural economics beyond mere surface description.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History