Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

mercantile_jealousy

null

2026-02-23T05:50:31.926078

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes mercantile jealousy as competitive hostility between merchants of different nations that leads to advocacy for protective measures. It avoids circularity and captures a specific behavioral pattern rather than a vague concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses how merchants' competitive fears and hostilities toward foreign rivals drive their support for trade restrictions. Smith uses this psychological mechanism to explain protectionist advocacy.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since mercantile jealousy is presented as a driving force behind regulatory capture and trade restrictions. This psychological factor directly explains the genesis of protective regulations.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic actors perceive and respond to competitive threats. However, it's more of a behavioral driver than a structural system component.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides excellent explanatory power by identifying the psychological mechanism that connects individual merchant interests to broader protectionist policies. It illuminates how private competitive fears translate into public policy advocacy, explaining a key dynamic in Smith's critique of mercantilism.

Evaluation: Mercantile Jealousy

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes mercantile jealousy as competitive hostility between merchants of different nations that leads to advocacy for protective measures. It avoids circularity and captures a specific behavioral pattern rather than a vague concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses how merchants' competitive fears and hostilities toward foreign rivals drive their support for trade restrictions. Smith uses this psychological mechanism to explain protectionist advocacy.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since mercantile jealousy is presented as a driving force behind regulatory capture and trade restrictions. This psychological factor directly explains the genesis of protective regulations.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic actors perceive and respond to competitive threats. However, it's more of a behavioral driver than a structural system component.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides excellent explanatory power by identifying the psychological mechanism that connects individual merchant interests to broader protectionist policies. It illuminates how private competitive fears translate into public policy advocacy, explaining a key dynamic in Smith's critique of mercantilism.

3.4 KiB Raw Blame History