Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.8 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

natural_preference_cultivation

null

2026-02-23T06:00:13.732953

3.6

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly identifies a specific human inclination toward agricultural employment and land ownership over commercial pursuits. While the concept of "natural preference" could be more precisely operationalized, it captures a distinct behavioral tendency that Smith discusses.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	3.0	5.0	Smith does discuss preferences for agriculture and land ownership in Book III, Chapter 1, but the framing as an "inherent human inclination" and "humanity's original destination" may overstate or interpret Smith's observations more strongly than the text supports. The concept appears grounded but potentially over-interpreted.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept relates to Smith's broader theoretical claims about human nature and economic behavior patterns. It's not specific to particular markets or institutional arrangements but rather addresses fundamental behavioral assumptions.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	2.0	5.0	This entity represents a behavioral preference or cultural tendency rather than a systemic function, making it difficult to map to any specific VSM system. It's more of an environmental constraint or background condition that might influence various systems rather than constituting a viable system component itself.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The concept provides genuine explanatory power by offering a mechanism (natural human preferences) to explain observed patterns in capital allocation and economic development. It helps illuminate why agricultural investment might be favored and how human nature shapes economic choices beyond pure profit maximization.

Evaluation: Natural Preference Cultivation

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly identifies a specific human inclination toward agricultural employment and land ownership over commercial pursuits. While the concept of "natural preference" could be more precisely operationalized, it captures a distinct behavioral tendency that Smith discusses.

source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0

Smith does discuss preferences for agriculture and land ownership in Book III, Chapter 1, but the framing as an "inherent human inclination" and "humanity's original destination" may overstate or interpret Smith's observations more strongly than the text supports. The concept appears grounded but potentially over-interpreted.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept relates to Smith's broader theoretical claims about human nature and economic behavior patterns. It's not specific to particular markets or institutional arrangements but rather addresses fundamental behavioral assumptions.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity represents a behavioral preference or cultural tendency rather than a systemic function, making it difficult to map to any specific VSM system. It's more of an environmental constraint or background condition that might influence various systems rather than constituting a viable system component itself.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The concept provides genuine explanatory power by offering a mechanism (natural human preferences) to explain observed patterns in capital allocation and economic development. It helps illuminate why agricultural investment might be favored and how human nature shapes economic choices beyond pure profit maximization.

3.8 KiB Raw Blame History