Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/non_enumerated_commodities.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.3 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
non_enumerated_commodities null 2026-02-23T06:02:36.867347 1.4
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 1.0 5.0 There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether this captures a distinct concept or represents a vague umbrella term.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 2.0 5.0 While "non-enumerated commodities" appears to reference a legitimate historical concept from colonial trade policy (goods not specifically listed in navigation acts), there's no evidence this entity is actually grounded in Smith's text. The complete absence of source chapter information and context suggests poor connection to the actual corpus.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 1.0 5.0 The domain is listed as "unspecified," making it impossible to assess whether the economic/thematic categorization is appropriate. This represents a fundamental failure in conceptual organization within the infospace.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 2.0 5.0 If properly defined, this concept might relate to S1 (operational trade categories) or S4 (environmental adaptation to regulatory frameworks), but the complete lack of definition makes VSM mapping speculative at best. The entity is too underdeveloped to meaningfully place within the VSM framework.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 1.0 5.0 With no definition, context, or source grounding, this entity provides zero explanatory power about economic mechanisms or structural relations. It currently functions as nothing more than an empty label that illuminates no phenomena whatsoever.

Evaluation: Non Enumerated Commodities

definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0

There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether this captures a distinct concept or represents a vague umbrella term.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While "non-enumerated commodities" appears to reference a legitimate historical concept from colonial trade policy (goods not specifically listed in navigation acts), there's no evidence this entity is actually grounded in Smith's text. The complete absence of source chapter information and context suggests poor connection to the actual corpus.

domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0

The domain is listed as "unspecified," making it impossible to assess whether the economic/thematic categorization is appropriate. This represents a fundamental failure in conceptual organization within the infospace.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

If properly defined, this concept might relate to S1 (operational trade categories) or S4 (environmental adaptation to regulatory frameworks), but the complete lack of definition makes VSM mapping speculative at best. The entity is too underdeveloped to meaningfully place within the VSM framework.

explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0

With no definition, context, or source grounding, this entity provides zero explanatory power about economic mechanisms or structural relations. It currently functions as nothing more than an empty label that illuminates no phenomena whatsoever.