Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

perpetual_funding

null

2026-02-23T06:05:42.249954

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes perpetual funding from other forms of government borrowing by specifying its key characteristics: indefinite interest payments without principal repayment, enabling larger borrowing capacity. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct financial mechanism.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's detailed analysis in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses the historical development from anticipations to perpetual annuities and their fiscal implications. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of this practice.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the appropriate domain since perpetual funding represents a specific governmental regulatory and fiscal policy mechanism for managing public debt. It fits squarely within Smith's discussion of public finance and government operations.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a specific mechanism for managing government resources and fiscal operations. It also has some relevance to S4 (intelligence) as it reflects adaptive responses to borrowing constraints and environmental fiscal pressures.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance that explains how governments can expand their borrowing capacity beyond short-term methods. It reveals the underlying logic of debt management evolution rather than merely naming a surface practice.

Evaluation: Perpetual Funding

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes perpetual funding from other forms of government borrowing by specifying its key characteristics: indefinite interest payments without principal repayment, enabling larger borrowing capacity. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct financial mechanism.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's detailed analysis in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses the historical development from anticipations to perpetual annuities and their fiscal implications. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of this practice.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the appropriate domain since perpetual funding represents a specific governmental regulatory and fiscal policy mechanism for managing public debt. It fits squarely within Smith's discussion of public finance and government operations.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a specific mechanism for managing government resources and fiscal operations. It also has some relevance to S4 (intelligence) as it reflects adaptive responses to borrowing constraints and environmental fiscal pressures.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance that explains how governments can expand their borrowing capacity beyond short-term methods. It reveals the underlying logic of debt management evolution rather than merely naming a surface practice.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History