Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

prohibition_of_importation

null

2026-02-23T06:11:22.585604

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes prohibition of importation as government bans on specific foreign goods, particularly manufactured products competing with domestic production. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct policy tool rather than a vague concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 8, where he extensively examines import prohibitions as a central mechanism of the mercantile system. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of how these bans protect domestic manufacturers at the expense of broader economic welfare.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain assignment is precisely correct, as prohibition of importation represents a specific form of government regulatory intervention in markets. This clearly belongs in the regulatory category rather than production, exchange, or other economic domains.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents regulatory control mechanisms within the economic system. However, it could also relate to S4 (environmental adaptation) regarding how the system responds to foreign competition, making the VSM placement somewhat ambiguous.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating a key mechanism through which the mercantile system operates and demonstrating the tension between protecting specific industries versus maximizing overall national wealth. It reveals important structural relations between trade policy and economic outcomes that Smith analyzes.

Evaluation: Prohibition Of Importation

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes prohibition of importation as government bans on specific foreign goods, particularly manufactured products competing with domestic production. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct policy tool rather than a vague concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 8, where he extensively examines import prohibitions as a central mechanism of the mercantile system. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of how these bans protect domestic manufacturers at the expense of broader economic welfare.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is precisely correct, as prohibition of importation represents a specific form of government regulatory intervention in markets. This clearly belongs in the regulatory category rather than production, exchange, or other economic domains.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents regulatory control mechanisms within the economic system. However, it could also relate to S4 (environmental adaptation) regarding how the system responds to foreign competition, making the VSM placement somewhat ambiguous.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating a key mechanism through which the mercantile system operates and demonstrating the tension between protecting specific industries versus maximizing overall national wealth. It reveals important structural relations between trade policy and economic outcomes that Smith analyzes.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History