Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

quantity_of_labour

null

2026-02-23T06:14:58.590951

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes quantity of labour as the amount of work required for production/acquisition, specifically in primitive economic conditions as a regulator of exchange value. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct measurable concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "work required."

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 6, where he explicitly discusses how labour quantity determines exchange ratios in early economic states before the complications of profit and rent emerge. The entity accurately reflects Smith's foundational labor theory of value.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Production" is the correct domain placement since quantity of labour is fundamentally about the productive effort required to create commodities. This is clearly a production-side concept rather than belonging to exchange, distribution, or consumption domains.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, most naturally mapping to S1 (primary operations) as it represents the basic productive work of the system. However, it's somewhat abstract as a pure measure rather than an operational mechanism, making the VSM placement less direct than more concrete operational entities.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism underlying exchange value in Smith's framework - how relative labour requirements create the structural basis for trade ratios. It reveals a core causal relationship rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Quantity Of Labour

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes quantity of labour as the amount of work required for production/acquisition, specifically in primitive economic conditions as a regulator of exchange value. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct measurable concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "work required."

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 6, where he explicitly discusses how labour quantity determines exchange ratios in early economic states before the complications of profit and rent emerge. The entity accurately reflects Smith's foundational labor theory of value.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Production" is the correct domain placement since quantity of labour is fundamentally about the productive effort required to create commodities. This is clearly a production-side concept rather than belonging to exchange, distribution, or consumption domains.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, most naturally mapping to S1 (primary operations) as it represents the basic productive work of the system. However, it's somewhat abstract as a pure measure rather than an operational mechanism, making the VSM placement less direct than more concrete operational entities.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism underlying exchange value in Smith's framework - how relative labour requirements create the structural basis for trade ratios. It reveals a core causal relationship rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History