Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

4.0 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

religious_occupational_restrictions

null

2026-02-23T06:17:09.454698

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition is quite precise, clearly specifying cultural/religious principles that enforce hereditary occupations and explaining the specific economic effect (preventing wage/profit rates from falling below natural rates). The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could be slightly more explicit about the mechanism by which this restriction affects market dynamics.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses ancient Egypt's religious restrictions on occupational mobility as an example of extreme policy measures. The economic analysis of how such restrictions prevent natural rate adjustments is faithful to Smith's argument.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain placement is entirely appropriate, as this represents a form of institutional constraint on labor markets that prevents natural economic adjustments. This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a market process or production factor.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, most naturally mapping to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a rigid control mechanism that constrains system adaptation. However, it could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) as it reflects deep cultural-religious identity that shapes economic structure, making its VSM placement somewhat ambiguous.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity provides strong explanatory value by illustrating a specific mechanism through which institutional constraints can permanently distort natural market processes across generations. It demonstrates how non-economic forces can create persistent market inefficiencies, adding genuine insight into the relationship between culture and economic dynamics.

Evaluation: Religious Occupational Restrictions

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is quite precise, clearly specifying cultural/religious principles that enforce hereditary occupations and explaining the specific economic effect (preventing wage/profit rates from falling below natural rates). The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could be slightly more explicit about the mechanism by which this restriction affects market dynamics.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses ancient Egypt's religious restrictions on occupational mobility as an example of extreme policy measures. The economic analysis of how such restrictions prevent natural rate adjustments is faithful to Smith's argument.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain placement is entirely appropriate, as this represents a form of institutional constraint on labor markets that prevents natural economic adjustments. This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a market process or production factor.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, most naturally mapping to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a rigid control mechanism that constrains system adaptation. However, it could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) as it reflects deep cultural-religious identity that shapes economic structure, making its VSM placement somewhat ambiguous.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides strong explanatory value by illustrating a specific mechanism through which institutional constraints can permanently distort natural market processes across generations. It demonstrates how non-economic forces can create persistent market inefficiencies, adding genuine insight into the relationship between culture and economic dynamics.

4.0 KiB Raw Blame History