Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

rent_of_land

null

2026-02-23T06:17:17.689056

4.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes rent as compensation for land use and natural resources, differentiating it from wages and profits. It captures the specific economic concept of land rent without circularity, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "natural produce."

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 where Smith explicitly introduces rent as the third component of price alongside wages and profits. The definition accurately reflects Smith's discussion of how landlords demand payment for natural produce and exclusive land rights.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Distribution" is the correct domain placement, as rent of land represents one of the three fundamental ways that value is distributed among different classes (landlords, workers, capitalists). This aligns perfectly with classical economic theory's treatment of factor payments.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	2.0	5.0	Rent of land is primarily a distributional outcome rather than a system function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might tangentially relate to S1 as part of operational economics, it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system's regulatory or control functions.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a fundamental mechanism of value distribution in market economies. It illuminates the structural relationship between property ownership and price formation, though it describes a distributional outcome rather than a dynamic process.

Evaluation: Rent Of Land

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes rent as compensation for land use and natural resources, differentiating it from wages and profits. It captures the specific economic concept of land rent without circularity, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "natural produce."

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 where Smith explicitly introduces rent as the third component of price alongside wages and profits. The definition accurately reflects Smith's discussion of how landlords demand payment for natural produce and exclusive land rights.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Distribution" is the correct domain placement, as rent of land represents one of the three fundamental ways that value is distributed among different classes (landlords, workers, capitalists). This aligns perfectly with classical economic theory's treatment of factor payments.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

Rent of land is primarily a distributional outcome rather than a system function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might tangentially relate to S1 as part of operational economics, it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system's regulatory or control functions.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a fundamental mechanism of value distribution in market economies. It illuminates the structural relationship between property ownership and price formation, though it describes a distributional outcome rather than a dynamic process.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History