Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

seignorage

null

2026-02-23T06:20:48.080529

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes seignorage as the specific difference between money's value and production costs, avoiding circularity. It precisely captures a distinct economic concept rather than being a vague umbrella term.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	Smith explicitly discusses seignorage in Book I, Chapter 5, examining how governments might use it as revenue and how it affects the relative values of coin versus bullion. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual treatment of this concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since Smith discusses seignorage primarily as a tool for government regulation of currency values and metal circulation. This fits perfectly within regulatory economic mechanisms.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	Seignorage maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as a mechanism for controlling monetary systems, and potentially to S4 (intelligence) regarding environmental adaptation of currency policy. It has clear VSM relevance rather than being too abstract.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The concept illuminates an important mechanism by which governments can influence monetary systems and the relationship between different forms of money. It explains structural relations in currency regulation rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Seignorage

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes seignorage as the specific difference between money's value and production costs, avoiding circularity. It precisely captures a distinct economic concept rather than being a vague umbrella term.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

Smith explicitly discusses seignorage in Book I, Chapter 5, examining how governments might use it as revenue and how it affects the relative values of coin versus bullion. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual treatment of this concept.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since Smith discusses seignorage primarily as a tool for government regulation of currency values and metal circulation. This fits perfectly within regulatory economic mechanisms.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

Seignorage maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as a mechanism for controlling monetary systems, and potentially to S4 (intelligence) regarding environmental adaptation of currency policy. It has clear VSM relevance rather than being too abstract.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The concept illuminates an important mechanism by which governments can influence monetary systems and the relationship between different forms of money. It explains structural relations in currency regulation rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

3.1 KiB Raw Blame History