Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

taille

null

2026-02-23T06:28:57.228034

4.6

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly specifies the taille as a French land tax based on supposed profits from farm stock, with well-articulated perverse incentives. It's precise and non-circular, though could benefit from slightly more detail about the assessment mechanism.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses the taille as a problematic French tax system. The description of its effects on cultivation and investment aligns closely with Smith's analysis.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as the taille represents a specific regulatory mechanism (taxation) that creates systematic economic distortions. It fits perfectly within Smith's broader analysis of how regulatory frameworks affect economic behavior.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as a regulatory mechanism that's supposed to monitor and extract value from economic activity, though it's a dysfunctional one. It also touches on S4 concerns about how regulatory systems adapt (or fail to adapt) to economic realities.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism showing how tax design creates systematic incentives that distort economic behavior, serving as a concrete example of Smith's broader principles about the relationship between institutional design and economic outcomes. It demonstrates structural causation rather than just naming a phenomenon.

Evaluation: Taille

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly specifies the taille as a French land tax based on supposed profits from farm stock, with well-articulated perverse incentives. It's precise and non-circular, though could benefit from slightly more detail about the assessment mechanism.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses the taille as a problematic French tax system. The description of its effects on cultivation and investment aligns closely with Smith's analysis.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as the taille represents a specific regulatory mechanism (taxation) that creates systematic economic distortions. It fits perfectly within Smith's broader analysis of how regulatory frameworks affect economic behavior.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as a regulatory mechanism that's supposed to monitor and extract value from economic activity, though it's a dysfunctional one. It also touches on S4 concerns about how regulatory systems adapt (or fail to adapt) to economic realities.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism showing how tax design creates systematic incentives that distort economic behavior, serving as a concrete example of Smith's broader principles about the relationship between institutional design and economic outcomes. It demonstrates structural causation rather than just naming a phenomenon.

3.4 KiB Raw Blame History