markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/artifacts/sources/book-3-chapter-03.md

id, title, book, chapter, artifact_type

id	title	book	chapter	artifact_type
book-3-chapter-03	OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF CITIES AND TOWNS, AFTER THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.	3	3	content

CHAPTER III. OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF CITIES AND TOWNS, AFTER THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.

  The inhabitants of cities and towns were, after the fall of the Roman
  empire, not more favoured than those of the country. They consisted,
  indeed, of a very different order of people from the first inhabitants of
  the ancient republics of Greece and Italy. These last were composed
  chiefly of the proprietors of lands, among whom the public territory was
  originally divided, and who found it convenient to build their houses in
  the neighbourhood of one another, and to surround them with a wall, for
  the sake of common defence. After the fall of the Roman empire, on the
  contrary, the proprietors of land seem generally to have lived in
  fortified castles on their own estates, and in the midst of their own
  tenants and dependants. The towns were chiefly inhabited by tradesmen and
  mechanics, who seem, in those days, to have been of servile, or very
  nearly of servile condition. The privileges which we find granted by
  ancient charters to the inhabitants of some of the principal towns in
  Europe, sufficiently show what they were before those grants. The people
  to whom it is granted as a privilege, that they might give away their own
  daughters in marriage without the consent of their lord, that upon their
  death their own children, and not their lord, should succeed to their
  goods, and that they might dispose of their own effects by will, must,
  before those grants, have been either altogether, or very nearly, in the
  same state of villanage with the occupiers of land in the country.

  They seem, indeed, to have been a very poor, mean set of people, who
  seemed to travel about with their goods from place to place, and from fair
  to fair, like the hawkers and pedlars of the present times. In all the
  different countries of Europe then, in the same manner as in several of
  the Tartar governments of Asia at present, taxes used to be levied upon
  the persons and goods of travellers, when they passed through certain
  manors, when they went over certain bridges, when they carried about their
  goods from place to place in a fair, when they erected in it a booth or
  stall to sell them in. These different taxes were known in England by the
  names of passage, pontage, lastage, and stallage. Sometimes the king,
  sometimes a great lord, who had, it seems, upon some occasions, authority
  to do this, would grant to particular traders, to such particularly as
  lived in their own demesnes, a general exemption from such taxes. Such
  traders, though in other respects of servile, or very nearly of servile
  condition, were upon this account called free traders. They, in return,
  usually paid to their protector a sort of annual poll-tax. In those days
  protection was seldom granted without a valuable consideration, and this
  tax might perhaps be considered as compensation for what their patrons
  might lose by their exemption from other taxes. At first, both those
  poll-taxes and those exemptions seem to have been altogether personal, and
  to have affected only particular individuals, during either their lives,
  or the pleasure of their protectors. In the very imperfect accounts which
  have been published from Doomsday-book, of several of the towns of
  England, mention is frequently made, sometimes of the tax which particular
  burghers paid, each of them, either to the king, or to some other great
  lord, for this sort of protection, and sometimes of the general amount
  only of all those taxes. {see Brady’s Historical Treatise of Cities and
  Boroughs, p. 3. etc.}

  But how servile soever may have been originally the condition of the
  inhabitants of the towns, it appears evidently, that they arrived at
  liberty and independency much earlier than the occupiers of land in the
  country. That part of the king’s revenue which arose from such poll-taxes
  in any particular town, used commonly to be let in farm, during a term of
  years, for a rent certain, sometimes to the sheriff of the county, and
  sometimes to other persons. The burghers themselves frequently got credit
  enough to be admitted to farm the revenues of this sort which arose out of
  their own town, they becoming jointly and severally answerable for the
  whole rent. {See Madox, Firma Burgi, p. 18; also History of the Exchequer,
  chap. 10, sect. v, p. 223, first edition.} To let a farm in this manner,
  was quite agreeable to the usual economy of, I believe, the sovereigns of
  all the different countries of Europe, who used frequently to let whole
  manors to all the tenants of those manors, they becoming jointly and
  severally answerable for the whole rent; but in return being allowed to
  collect it in their own way, and to pay it into the king’s exchequer by
  the hands of their own bailiff, and being thus altogether freed from the
  insolence of the king’s officers; a circumstance in those days regarded as
  of the greatest importance.

  At first, the farm of the town was probably let to the burghers, in the
  same manner as it had been to other farmers, for a term of years only. In
  process of time, however, it seems to have become the general practice to
  grant it to them in fee, that is for ever, reserving a rent certain, never
  afterwards to be augmented. The payment having thus become perpetual, the
  exemptions, in return, for which it was made, naturally became perpetual
  too. Those exemptions, therefore, ceased to be personal, and could not
  afterwards be considered as belonging to individuals, as individuals, but
  as burghers of a particular burgh, which, upon this account, was called a
  free burgh, for the same reason that they had been called free burghers or
  free traders.

  Along with this grant, the important privileges, above mentioned, that
  they might give away their own daughters in marriage, that their children
  should succeed to them, and that they might dispose of their own effects
  by will, were generally bestowed upon the burghers of the town to whom it
  was given. Whether such privileges had before been usually granted, along
  with the freedom of trade, to particular burghers, as individuals, I know
  not. I reckon it not improbable that they were, though I cannot produce
  any direct evidence of it. But however this may have been, the principal
  attributes of villanage and slavery being thus taken away from them, they
  now at least became really free, in our present sense of the word freedom.

  Nor was this all. They were generally at the same time erected into a
  commonalty or corporation, with the privilege of having magistrates and a
  town-council of their own, of making bye-laws for their own government, of
  building walls for their own defence, and of reducing all their
  inhabitants under a sort of military discipline, by obliging them to watch
  and ward; that is, as anciently understood, to guard and defend those
  walls against all attacks and surprises, by night as well as by day. In
  England they were generally exempted from suit to the hundred and county
  courts: and all such pleas as should arise among them, the pleas of the
  crown excepted, were left to the decision of their own magistrates. In
  other countries, much greater and more extensive jurisdictions were
  frequently granted to them. {See Madox, Firma Burgi. See also Pfeffel in
  the Remarkable events under Frederick II. and his Successors of the House
  of Suabia.}

  It might, probably, be necessary to grant to such towns as were admitted
  to farm their own revenues, some sort of compulsive jurisdiction to oblige
  their own citizens to make payment. In those disorderly times, it might
  have been extremely inconvenient to have left them to seek this sort of
  justice from any other tribunal. But it must seem extraordinary, that the
  sovereigns of all the different countries of Europe should have exchanged
  in this manner for a rent certain, never more to be augmented, that branch
  of their revenue, which was, perhaps, of all others, the most likely to be
  improved by the natural course of things, without either expense or
  attention of their own; and that they should, besides, have in this manner
  voluntarily erected a sort of independent republics in the heart of their
  own dominions.

  In order to understand this, it must be remembered, that, in those days,
  the sovereign of perhaps no country in Europe was able to protect, through
  the whole extent of his dominions, the weaker part of his subjects from
  the oppression of the great lords. Those whom the law could not protect,
  and who were not strong enough to defend themselves, were obliged either
  to have recourse to the protection of some great lord, and in order to
  obtain it, to become either his slaves or vassals; or to enter into a
  league of mutual defence for the common protection of one another. The
  inhabitants of cities and burghs, considered as single individuals, had no
  power to defend themselves; but by entering into a league of mutual
  defence with their neighbours, they were capable of making no contemptible
  resistance. The lords despised the burghers, whom they considered not only
  as a different order, but as a parcel of emancipated slaves, almost of a
  different species from themselves. The wealth of the burghers never failed
  to provoke their envy and indignation, and they plundered them upon every
  occasion without mercy or remorse. The burghers naturally hated and feared
  the lords. The king hated and feared them too; but though, perhaps, he
  might despise, he had no reason either to hate or fear the burghers.
  Mutual interest, therefore, disposed them to support the king, and the
  king to support them against the lords. They were the enemies of his
  enemies, and it was his interest to render them as secure and independent
  of those enemies as he could. By granting them magistrates of their own,
  the privilege of making bye-laws for their own government, that of
  building walls for their own defence, and that of reducing all their
  inhabitants under a sort of military discipline, he gave them all the
  means of security and independency of the barons which it was in his power
  to bestow. Without the establishment of some regular government of this
  kind, without some authority to compel their inhabitants to act according
  to some certain plan or system, no voluntary league of mutual defence
  could either have afforded them any permanent security, or have enabled
  them to give the king any considerable support. By granting them the farm
  of their own town in fee, he took away from those whom he wished to have
  for his friends, and, if one may say so, for his allies, all ground of
  jealousy and suspicion, that he was ever afterwards to oppress them,
  either by raising the farm-rent of their town, or by granting it to some
  other farmer.

  The princes who lived upon the worst terms with their barons, seem
  accordingly to have been the most liberal in grants of this kind to their
  burghs. King John of England, for example, appears to have been a most
  munificent benefactor to his towns. {See Madox.} Philip I. of France lost
  all authority over his barons. Towards the end of his reign, his son
  Lewis, known afterwards by the name of Lewis the Fat, consulted, according
  to Father Daniel, with the bishops of the royal demesnes, concerning the
  most proper means of restraining the violence of the great lords. Their
  advice consisted of two different proposals. One was to erect a new order
  of jurisdiction, by establishing magistrates and a town-council in every
  considerable town of his demesnes. The other was to form a new militia, by
  making the inhabitants of those towns, under the command of their own
  magistrates, march out upon proper occasions to the assistance of the
  king. It is from this period, according to the French antiquarians, that
  we are to date the institution of the magistrates and councils of cities
  in France. It was during the unprosperous reigns of the princes of the
  house of Suabia, that the greater part of the free towns of Germany
  received the first grants of their privileges, and that the famous
  Hanseatic league first became formidable. {See Pfeffel.}

  The militia of the cities seems, in those times, not to have been inferior
  to that of the country; and as they could be more readily assembled upon
  any sudden occasion, they frequently had the advantage in their disputes
  with the neighbouring lords. In countries such as Italy or Switzerland, in
  which, on account either of their distance from the principal seat of
  government, of the natural strength of the country itself, or of some
  other reason, the sovereign came to lose the whole of his authority; the
  cities generally became independent republics, and conquered all the
  nobility in their neighbourhood; obliging them to pull down their castles
  in the country, and to live, like other peaceable inhabitants, in the
  city. This is the short history of the republic of Berne, as well as of
  several other cities in Switzerland. If you except Venice, for of that
  city the history is somewhat different, it is the history of all the
  considerable Italian republics, of which so great a number arose and
  perished between the end of the twelfth and the beginning of the sixteenth
  century.

  In countries such as France and England, where the authority of the
  sovereign, though frequently very low, never was destroyed altogether, the
  cities had no opportunity of becoming entirely independent. They became,
  however, so considerable, that the sovereign could impose no tax upon
  them, besides the stated farm-rent of the town, without their own consent.
  They were, therefore, called upon to send deputies to the general assembly
  of the states of the kingdom, where they might join with the clergy and
  the barons in granting, upon urgent occasions, some extraordinary aid to
  the king. Being generally, too, more favourable to his power, their
  deputies seem sometimes to have been employed by him as a counterbalance
  in those assemblies to the authority of the great lords. Hence the origin
  of the representation of burghs in the states-general of all great
  monarchies in Europe.

  Order and good government, and along with them the liberty and security of
  individuals, were in this manner established in cities, at a time when the
  occupiers of land in the country, were exposed to every sort of violence.
  But men in this defenceless state naturally content themselves with their
  necessary subsistence; because, to acquire more, might only tempt the
  injustice of their oppressors. On the contrary, when they are secure of
  enjoying the fruits of their industry, they naturally exert it to better
  their condition, and to acquire not only the necessaries, but the
  conveniencies and elegancies of life. That industry, therefore, which aims
  at something more than necessary subsistence, was established in cities
  long before it was commonly practised by the occupiers of land in the
  country. If, in the hands of a poor cultivator, oppressed with the
  servitude of villanage, some little stock should accumulate, he would
  naturally conceal it with great care from his master, to whom it would
  otherwise have belonged, and take the first opportunity of running away to
  a town. The law was at that time so indulgent to the inhabitants of towns,
  and so desirous of diminishing the authority of the lords over those of
  the country, that if he could conceal himself there from the pursuit of
  his lord for a year, he was free for ever. Whatever stock, therefore,
  accumulated in the hands of the industrious part of the inhabitants of the
  country, naturally took refuge in cities, as the only sanctuaries in which
  it could be secure to the person that acquired it.

  The inhabitants of a city, it is true, must always ultimately derive their
  subsistence, and the whole materials and means of their industry, from the
  country. But those of a city, situated near either the sea-coast or the
  banks of a navigable river, are not necessarily confined to derive them
  from the country in their neighbourhood. They have a much wider range, and
  may draw them from the most remote corners of the world, either in
  exchange for the manufactured produce of their own industry, or by
  performing the office of carriers between distant countries, and
  exchanging the produce of one for that of another. A city might, in this
  manner, grow up to great wealth and splendour, while not only the country
  in its neighbourhood, but all those to which it traded, were in poverty
  and wretchedness. Each of those countries, perhaps, taken singly, could
  afford it but a small part, either of its subsistence or of its
  employment; but all of them taken together, could afford it both a great
  subsistence and a great employment. There were, however, within the narrow
  circle of the commerce of those times, some countries that were opulent
  and industrious. Such was the Greek empire as long as it subsisted, and
  that of the Saracens during the reigns of the Abassides. Such, too, was
  Egypt till it was conquered by the Turks, some part of the coast of
  Barbary, and all those provinces of Spain which were under the government
  of the Moors.

  The cities of Italy seem to have been the first in Europe which were
  raised by commerce to any considerable degree of opulence. Italy lay in
  the centre of what was at that time the improved and civilized part of the
  world. The crusades, too, though, by the great waste of stock and
  destruction of inhabitants which they occasioned, they must necessarily
  have retarded the progress of the greater part of Europe, were extremely
  favourable to that of some Italian cities. The great armies which marched
  from all parts to the conquest of the Holy Land, gave extraordinary
  encouragement to the shipping of Venice, Genoa, and Pisa, sometimes in
  transporting them thither, and always in supplying them with provisions.
  They were the commissaries, if one may say so, of those armies; and the
  most destructive frenzy that ever befel the European nations, was a source
  of opulence to those republics.

  The inhabitants of trading cities, by importing the improved manufactures
  and expensive luxuries of richer countries, afforded some food to the
  vanity of the great proprietors, who eagerly purchased them with great
  quantities of the rude produce of their own lands. The commerce of a great
  part of Europe in those times, accordingly, consisted chiefly in the
  exchange of their own rude, for the manufactured produce of more civilized
  nations. Thus the wool of England used to be exchanged for the wines of
  France, and the fine cloths of Flanders, in the same manner as the corn in
  Poland is at this day, exchanged for the wines and brandies of France, and
  for the silks and velvets of France and Italy.

  A taste for the finer and more improved manufactures was, in this manner,
  introduced by foreign commerce into countries where no such works were
  carried on. But when this taste became so general as to occasion a
  considerable demand, the merchants, in order to save the expense of
  carriage, naturally endeavoured to establish some manufactures of the same
  kind in their own country. Hence the origin of the first manufactures for
  distant sale, that seem to have been established in the western provinces
  of Europe, after the fall of the Roman empire.

  No large country, it must be observed, ever did or could subsist without
  some sort of manufactures being carried on in it; and when it is said of
  any such country that it has no manufactures, it must always be understood
  of the finer and more improved, or of such as are fit for distant sale. In
  every large country both the clothing and household furniture or the far
  greater part of the people, are the produce of their own industry. This is
  even more universally the case in those poor countries which are commonly
  said to have no manufactures, than in those rich ones that are said to
  abound in them. In the latter you will generally find, both in the clothes
  and household furniture of the lowest rank of people, a much greater
  proportion of foreign productions than in the former.

  Those manufactures which are fit for distant sale, seem to have been
  introduced into different countries in two different ways.

  Sometimes they have been introduced in the manner above mentioned, by the
  violent operation, if one may say so, of the stocks of particular
  merchants and undertakers, who established them in imitation of some
  foreign manufactures of the same kind. Such manufactures, therefore, are
  the offspring of foreign commerce; and such seem to have been the ancient
  manufactures of silks, velvets, and brocades, which flourished in Lucca
  during the thirteenth century. They were banished from thence by the
  tyranny of one of Machiavel’s heroes, Castruccio Castracani. In 1310, nine
  hundred families were driven out of Lucca, of whom thirty-one retired to
  Venice, and offered to introduce there the silk manufacture. {See Sandi
  Istoria civile de Vinezia, part 2 vol. i, page 247 and 256.} Their offer
  was accepted, many privileges were conferred upon them, and they began the
  manufacture with three hundred workmen. Such, too, seem to have been the
  manufactures of fine cloths that anciently flourished in Flanders, and
  which were introduced into England in the beginning of the reign of
  Elizabeth, and such are the present silk manufactures of Lyons and
  Spitalfields. Manufactures introduced in this manner are generally
  employed upon foreign materials, being imitations of foreign manufactures.
  When the Venetian manufacture was first established, the materials were
  all brought from Sicily and the Levant. The more ancient manufacture of
  Lucca was likewise carried on with foreign materials. The cultivation of
  mulberry trees, and the breeding of silk-worms, seem not to have been
  common in the northern parts of Italy before the sixteenth century. Those
  arts were not introduced into France till the reign of Charles IX. The
  manufactures of Flanders were carried on chiefly with Spanish and English
  wool. Spanish wool was the material, not of the first woollen manufacture
  of England, but of the first that was fit for distant sale. More than one
  half the materials of the Lyons manufacture is at this day foreign silk;
  when it was first established, the whole, or very nearly the whole, was
  so. No part of the materials of the Spitalfields manufacture is ever
  likely to be the produce of England. The seat of such manufactures, as
  they are generally introduced by the scheme and project of a few
  individuals, is sometimes established in a maritime city, and sometimes in
  an inland town, according as their interest, judgment, or caprice, happen
  to determine.

  At other times, manufactures for distant sale grow up naturally, and as it
  were of their own accord, by the gradual refinement of those household and
  coarser manufactures which must at all times be carried on even in the
  poorest and rudest countries. Such manufactures are generally employed
  upon the materials which the country produces, and they seem frequently to
  have been first refined and improved in such inland countries as were not,
  indeed, at a very great, but at a considerable distance from the
  sea-coast, and sometimes even from all water carriage. An inland country,
  naturally fertile and easily cultivated, produces a great surplus of
  provisions beyond what is necessary for maintaining the cultivators; and
  on account of the expense of land carriage, and inconveniency of river
  navigation, it may frequently be difficult to send this surplus abroad.
  Abundance, therefore, renders provisions cheap, and encourages a great
  number of workmen to settle in the neighbourhood, who find that their
  industry can there procure them more of the necessaries and conveniencies
  of life than in other places. They work up the materials of manufacture
  which the land produces, and exchange their finished work, or, what is the
  same thing, the price of it, for more materials and provisions. They give
  a new value to the surplus part of the rude produce, by saving the expense
  of carrying it to the water-side, or to some distant market; and they
  furnish the cultivators with something in exchange for it that is either
  useful or agreeable to them, upon easier terms than they could have
  obtained it before. The cultivators get a better price for their surplus
  produce, and can purchase cheaper other conveniencies which they have
  occasion for. They are thus both encouraged and enabled to increase this
  surplus produce by a further improvement and better cultivation of the
  land; and as the fertility of the land had given birth to the manufacture,
  so the progress of the manufacture re-acts upon the land, and increases
  still further its fertility. The manufacturers first supply the
  neighbourhood, and afterwards, as their work improves and refines, more
  distant markets. For though neither the rude produce, nor even the coarse
  manufacture, could, without the greatest difficulty, support the expense
  of a considerable land-carriage, the refined and improved manufacture
  easily may. In a small bulk it frequently contains the price of a great
  quantity of rude produce. A piece of fine cloth, for example which weighs
  only eighty pounds, contains in it the price, not only of eighty pounds
  weight of wool, but sometimes of several thousand weight of corn, the
  maintenance of the different working people, and of their immediate
  employers. The corn which could with difficulty have been carried abroad
  in its own shape, is in this manner virtually exported in that of the
  complete manufacture, and may easily be sent to the remotest corners of
  the world. In this manner have grown up naturally, and, as it were, of
  their own accord, the manufactures of Leeds, Halifax, Sheffield,
  Birmingham, and Wolverhampton. Such manufactures are the offspring of
  agriculture. In the modern history of Europe, their extension and
  improvement have generally been posterior to those which were the
  offspring of foreign commerce. England was noted for the manufacture of
  fine cloths made of Spanish wool, more than a century before any of those
  which now flourish in the places above mentioned were fit for foreign
  sale. The extension and improvement of these last could not take place but
  in consequence of the extension and improvement of agriculture, the last
  and greatest effect of foreign commerce, and of the manufactures
  immediately introduced by it, and which I shall now proceed to explain.