Files
markitect-tool/workplans/MKTT-WP-0004-practical-contract-framework.md

3.6 KiB

id, type, title, domain, status, owner, topic_slug, created, updated
id type title domain status owner topic_slug created updated
MKTT-WP-0004 workplan Practical Document Contract Framework markitect proposed markitect-tool markitect 2026-05-03 2026-05-03

MKTT-WP-0004: Practical Document Contract Framework

Purpose

Improve the practical utility of markitect-tool by moving beyond generic heading-count schema validation toward document contracts with section specifications, fields/forms, context-aware rules, metric bands, optional LLM assessments, and unified diagnostics.

Background

Research and legacy comparison are captured in:

  • docs/practical-schema-framework-research.md
  • docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md
  • docs/markitect-main-test-migration-inventory.md

P4.1 - Define contract terminology and file format

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T001
status: todo
priority: high

Define the first DocumentContract format in markdown/YAML:

  • document type
  • section specifications
  • field/form specifications
  • deterministic rules/assertions
  • metric bands
  • optional assessment rubrics
  • diagnostic metadata

Keep it provider-neutral and readable by humans.

P4.2 - Implement unified diagnostic model

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T002
status: todo
priority: high

Create diagnostics with severity, code, message, source location, contract location, rule id, and optional repair guidance. Use this model for JSON Schema violations and all new contract checks.

P4.3 - Implement section specifications

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T003
status: todo
priority: high

Support required, recommended, optional, discouraged, and forbidden sections. Support aliases, expected heading level, section type, ordering constraints, and clear diagnostics.

P4.4 - Implement metric bands

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T004
status: todo
priority: medium

Support document-level and section-level bands for words, characters, sentences, paragraphs, sections, list items, code blocks, and nesting depth. Allow soft warnings and hard errors.

P4.5 - Design form and context model

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T005
status: todo
priority: medium

Specify fields, defaults, prefill sources, dynamic requiredness, conditional visibility, calculations, and validation against external context. This task is design-first; implementation can follow in a later workplan.

P4.6 - Design LLM assessment adapter contract

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T006
status: todo
priority: medium

Define provider-neutral request/response models for section-level rubrics: criteria, inputs, context, score, pass/fail, reason, model metadata, and cache keys. Do not bind core logic to any provider.

P4.7 - Add practical CLI surface

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T007
status: todo
priority: high

Add:

mkt contract validate <contract.md>
mkt contract check <document.md> --contract <contract.md>
mkt metrics <document.md>

Ensure output is useful to humans and machines.

P4.8 - Build use-case examples

id: MKTT-WP-0004-T008
status: todo
priority: medium

Create examples for:

  • ADR
  • PRD/FRS
  • workplan
  • personalized/business letter
  • concept note or entity profile

Each example should include contract, valid document, invalid document, and expected diagnostics.

Decision Point

This workplan should probably run before WP-0003 query/transform/cache work, because it changes what "validation" means and establishes the diagnostic model that later query/transform/generation features should reuse.

If postponed, continue WP-0003 with query/extraction only if we commit to revisiting diagnostics and contract semantics before generation or LLM hooks.