Compare commits
11 Commits
c861520ccd
...
ef3d47779e
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ef3d47779e | |||
| d1f57272a4 | |||
| a9ca0adfcf | |||
| 81a4c8796a | |||
| 2d45425b25 | |||
| fa27572f43 | |||
| dfab3d598b | |||
| 34ed7a6fab | |||
| 7f1eecbdb2 | |||
| 574bb11db6 | |||
| 8f00fa2018 |
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ How the example measures against the objectives stated in `README.md`:
|
||||
| 9 | No infrastructure changes during experiment | **Violated** | Three infra fixes were required (tasks 1-3 above). Documented as intended. |
|
||||
| 10 | Generate task list for infra issues | **Done** | This file. |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Infospace has no per-chapter git history — OPEN
|
||||
## 4. Infospace has no per-chapter git history — PARTIAL
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective:** README states "The information space should utilize the option
|
||||
of keeping changes as git history."
|
||||
@@ -69,12 +69,15 @@ archive policy. There is no commit where you can `git diff` to see exactly
|
||||
what one chapter contributed to the infospace.
|
||||
**Impact:** Cannot use `git log`, `git diff`, or `git bisect` to trace how
|
||||
the infospace grew chapter by chapter — the core promise of "with history."
|
||||
**Suggested fix:** Re-run the 7 processed chapters (and remaining 28) using
|
||||
**Progress:** Branch `clean-example-history` was created. Chapters 1-8 have
|
||||
clean per-chapter commits. 27 chapters remain. Example completeness (tasks 4
|
||||
and 7) is deferred; no further action planned.
|
||||
**Suggested fix (original):** Re-run the processed chapters using
|
||||
`process_chapters.py` without `--no-commit`, on a clean branch or after
|
||||
squashing the current output into a baseline commit. Each chapter gets its
|
||||
own commit via `_git_commit_chapter()`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Prompt files are regenerated as a side-effect of DB rebuild — OPEN
|
||||
## 5. Prompt files are regenerated as a side-effect of DB rebuild — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** Running `--all --no-commit` to regenerate `infospace.db` also
|
||||
overwrites `*-prompt.md` files in the output directories because each
|
||||
@@ -85,9 +88,10 @@ chapters change on every full run.
|
||||
**Impact:** A DB regeneration dirties the working tree with prompt file
|
||||
changes, even though no actual outputs changed. Users must `git checkout`
|
||||
the prompt files after regeneration.
|
||||
**Suggested fix:** Skip writing prompt files when the corresponding output
|
||||
file already exists on disk, or add a `--rebuild-db-only` flag that
|
||||
populates the database without touching the file system.
|
||||
**Fix applied:** Each pipeline stage (`stage_extract_entities`,
|
||||
`stage_map_to_vsm`, `stage_synthesize_analysis`, `assess_metrics`) now
|
||||
skips writing the `*-prompt.md` file when the corresponding output file
|
||||
already exists on disk. DB regeneration no longer dirties the working tree.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Metrics report is stale — OPEN
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -99,15 +103,16 @@ the report has not been refreshed.
|
||||
after every batch of new chapters. Consider making metrics assessment
|
||||
automatic at the end of `--book` or `--all` runs.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Remaining 28 chapters not yet processed — OPEN
|
||||
## 7. Remaining 28 chapters not yet processed — DEFERRED
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** Only Book I chapters 1-7 have been processed. Books II-V
|
||||
(28 chapters) remain unprocessed.
|
||||
**Impact:** The infospace is incomplete — VSM coverage is limited to S1,
|
||||
S2, and partial S4. S3, S3*, S5, and many systemic concepts (algedonic
|
||||
signals, recursion, variety) are expected to emerge from later books.
|
||||
**Suggested fix:** Process remaining chapters in book-sized batches with
|
||||
per-chapter commits, refreshing metrics after each book.
|
||||
**Note:** Example completeness is deferred. The 7/35 chapter corpus is
|
||||
sufficient to validate the tooling. Resuming requires the `clean-example-history`
|
||||
branch and a valid `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -130,7 +135,7 @@ The improvement splits metrics into two layers:
|
||||
Both layers persist results in structured form so they can be diffed,
|
||||
tracked over time, and committed alongside the entities they evaluate.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Add per-concept quality metrics to entity schema — OPEN
|
||||
## 8. Add per-concept quality metrics to entity schema — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** The entity schema (`economic-entity-schema-v1.0.md`) defines
|
||||
required sections and validation rules (section presence, word count range)
|
||||
@@ -158,8 +163,10 @@ Similarly update the VSM mapping schema with:
|
||||
Weak) consistent with the rationale given?
|
||||
|
||||
These rubrics become the prompt instructions for task 9.
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `## Quality Metrics` section added to
|
||||
`schemas/economic-entity-schema-v1.0.md` and `schemas/vsm-mapping-schema-v1.0.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Create evaluate-entity prompt template — OPEN
|
||||
## 9. Create evaluate-entity prompt template — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 8 (quality metrics in schema).
|
||||
**Issue:** There is no mechanism to evaluate an existing entity after
|
||||
@@ -193,8 +200,11 @@ Add a pipeline stage: `--evaluate` runs this template against every
|
||||
canonical entity and writes results to `output/evaluations/<slug>-eval.md`.
|
||||
A `--evaluate --chapter <id>` variant evaluates only entities introduced
|
||||
by that chapter.
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `templates/evaluate-entity.md` created. `--evaluate`
|
||||
flag added to `process_chapters.py`. Reads `@{quality_rubric}` from the
|
||||
entity schema's Quality Metrics section.
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Add deterministic schema compliance checker — OPEN
|
||||
## 10. Add deterministic schema compliance checker — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** Schema compliance is currently LLM-evaluated ("100%" in the
|
||||
metrics report) but the validation rules in the schemas are mechanical:
|
||||
@@ -222,8 +232,10 @@ Validation: 85 entities, 3 warnings
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is fully deterministic — no LLM calls needed.
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/validator.py` — `validate_entity()`
|
||||
and `validate_entities()`. Exposed via `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Structured metrics output format — OPEN
|
||||
## 11. Structured metrics output format — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Tasks 9 and 10.
|
||||
**Issue:** The metrics report is a markdown narrative. Values cannot be
|
||||
@@ -261,8 +273,9 @@ evaluation: # from LLM-eval (task 9)
|
||||
|
||||
The `--metrics` command writes both files. The YAML file is committed
|
||||
to git so `git diff` shows exactly how metrics changed between runs.
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `output/metrics/metrics.yaml` produced by `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Metrics-over-time tracking — OPEN
|
||||
## 12. Metrics-over-time tracking — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 11 (structured output).
|
||||
**Issue:** There is one metrics snapshot that gets overwritten. No history
|
||||
@@ -283,6 +296,8 @@ Metrics history (5 snapshots):
|
||||
This provides the "metrics that improve over time" feedback loop the
|
||||
README envisions: process chapters → evaluate → see coverage grow (or
|
||||
flag regressions when a re-extraction reduces quality scores).
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `output/metrics/history.yaml` maintained by
|
||||
`markitect/infospace/history.py`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -296,7 +311,7 @@ be built once per evaluation run.
|
||||
See the methodology document for theoretical grounding, framework
|
||||
references, and the full metric definitions per concern.
|
||||
|
||||
## 13. Entity metadata index — deterministic parsing layer — OPEN
|
||||
## 13. Entity metadata index — deterministic parsing layer — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 10 (schema compliance checker shares parsing logic).
|
||||
**Issue:** Several collection-level metrics (coverage matrix, FCA context,
|
||||
@@ -324,8 +339,10 @@ class EntityMeta:
|
||||
Build an index of all entities at the start of each evaluation run.
|
||||
This index is the input for tasks 14, 16, and 18. Expose as
|
||||
`--index` CLI flag for inspection.
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/entity_parser.py` — `parse_entity_file()`
|
||||
and `parse_entity_directory()`. Used automatically by `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 14. Redundancy detection (Concern C1) — OPEN
|
||||
## 14. Redundancy detection (Concern C1) — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 13 (metadata index).
|
||||
**Methodology:** OOPS! P2 (synonymous classes) + embedding similarity +
|
||||
@@ -357,8 +374,9 @@ dedup only checks slug collisions. There is no semantic overlap detection.
|
||||
- `intensional_conciseness`: `1 - redundancy_ratio`
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI:** `--check-redundancy --provider <provider>`
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/checks/redundancy.py`. Exposed via `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 15. Coverage completeness (Concern C2) — OPEN
|
||||
## 15. Coverage completeness (Concern C2) — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 13 (metadata index).
|
||||
**Methodology:** SEQUAL completeness + FCA gap analysis + DSL competency
|
||||
@@ -399,8 +417,9 @@ questions about the economic system.
|
||||
- `competency_coverage`: fraction of questions answerable
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI:** `--check-coverage --provider <provider>`
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/checks/coverage.py`. Exposed via `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 16. Structural coherence (Concern C3) — OPEN
|
||||
## 16. Structural coherence (Concern C3) — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 13 (metadata index).
|
||||
**Methodology:** OntoQA relationship richness + graph connectivity +
|
||||
@@ -440,8 +459,9 @@ between entities.
|
||||
- `cohesion_by_domain` / `coupling_across_domains`: scalars
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI:** `--check-coherence --provider <provider>`
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/checks/coherence.py`. Exposed via `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 17. Definitional consistency (Concern C4) — OPEN
|
||||
## 17. Definitional consistency (Concern C4) — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 16 (relationship graph — the definitional dependency
|
||||
graph is a directed variant of the same structure).
|
||||
@@ -479,8 +499,9 @@ entities but aren't.
|
||||
- `source_fidelity_score`: fraction passing source check
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI:** `--check-consistency --provider <provider>`
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/checks/consistency.py`. Exposed via `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 18. Granularity balance (Concern C5) — OPEN
|
||||
## 18. Granularity balance (Concern C5) — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Task 13 (metadata index).
|
||||
**Methodology:** Keet granularity theory + OntoClean rigidity +
|
||||
@@ -517,8 +538,9 @@ or whether some entities are too specific/general relative to their peers.
|
||||
- `split_candidates`: list of entities
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI:** `--check-granularity --provider <provider>`
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/checks/granularity.py`. Exposed via `--infospace-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 19. Unified collection evaluation command — OPEN
|
||||
## 19. Unified collection evaluation command — RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Depends on:** Tasks 13-18.
|
||||
**Issue:** Running five separate `--check-*` commands is cumbersome and
|
||||
@@ -537,6 +559,10 @@ runs all five checks in sequence, sharing infrastructure:
|
||||
Incremental mode: `--evaluate-collection --chapter <id>` re-evaluates
|
||||
only entities from that chapter plus pairwise checks involving them.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix applied:** `markitect/infospace/checks/orchestrator.py` + `--infospace-check`
|
||||
CLI flag. All five checks share the metadata index. Results recorded in
|
||||
`output/metrics/metrics.yaml` and `output/metrics/history.yaml`.
|
||||
|
||||
Report a summary to stdout:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ metrics — it is fit for purpose as an explanatory tool.
|
||||
```
|
||||
examples/infospace-with-history/
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── infospace.yaml # Declarative infospace configuration (NEW)
|
||||
├── infospace.yaml # Declarative infospace configuration
|
||||
├── README.md
|
||||
├── TUTORIAL.md # This file
|
||||
├── INFRA-TASKS.md # Infrastructure issues found during the experiment
|
||||
├── process_chapters.py # Pipeline script (chapter processing)
|
||||
├── LAYERED-DEVELOPMENT.md # Concept for L2–L4 entity classification and modelling
|
||||
├── infospace.db # SQLite artifact database (generated, not in git)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── schemas/ # Output structure definitions
|
||||
@@ -301,61 +301,79 @@ Named `book-1-chapter-01.md` through `book-5-chapter-03.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Processing Chapters
|
||||
|
||||
`process_chapters.py` orchestrates the three-stage pipeline. It initialises
|
||||
the artifact repository, loads static artifacts, runs entity extraction →
|
||||
VSM mapping → analysis synthesis, and commits each chapter to git.
|
||||
`markitect infospace process` orchestrates the three-stage pipeline declared
|
||||
in `infospace.yaml`. It runs entity extraction → VSM mapping → analysis
|
||||
synthesis for each source file, and commits each chapter to git.
|
||||
|
||||
### Single chapter
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Manual mode (writes prompts, awaits output files):
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-05 --no-commit
|
||||
# Dry run — loads existing outputs only, no LLM calls:
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-05.md"
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto mode via OpenRouter (free models available):
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-05 --provider openrouter
|
||||
# Process via OpenRouter (free models available):
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-05.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
|
||||
# With a specific free model:
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-05 \
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-05.md" \
|
||||
--provider openrouter --model meta-llama/llama-4-maverick:free
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip git commit after processing:
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-05.md" \
|
||||
--provider openrouter --no-commit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The GLOB_PATTERN is matched against the `sources` directory declared in
|
||||
`infospace.yaml`. Already-processed chapters are skipped automatically —
|
||||
their output files already exist on disk.
|
||||
|
||||
### Whole book or all chapters
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --book 1 --provider openrouter
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --all --provider openrouter
|
||||
# Process all chapters of Book 1:
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-*.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
|
||||
# Process all 35 source files:
|
||||
markitect infospace process --all --provider openrouter
|
||||
|
||||
# Process all chapters and run quality checks after each one:
|
||||
markitect infospace process --all --provider openrouter --check-after-each
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Check progress
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --list
|
||||
markitect infospace status
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Available chapters (35):
|
||||
|
||||
Chapter Entities Mappings Analysis
|
||||
------------------------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
|
||||
book-1-chapter-01 done (13) done done
|
||||
book-1-chapter-02 done (7) done done
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical entity set: 109 unique entities
|
||||
Infospace: The Wealth of Nations
|
||||
Domain: Classical Economics
|
||||
Entities: 988
|
||||
Domains: Accumulation, Consumption, Distribution, Exchange,
|
||||
General Theory, Production, Regulation
|
||||
Disciplines: Viable System Model
|
||||
Last evaluated: 2026-02-19T21:54:44
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
markitect infospace entities
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Lists all canonical entities with domain, source chapter, and word count.
|
||||
|
||||
### Entity lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
Entities in the canonical set are **never silently deleted**. Retire
|
||||
an entity by archiving it with a documented reason:
|
||||
Entities in the canonical set are **never silently deleted**. To retire
|
||||
an entity, move it to `output/entities/archive/<slug>.md` and add a
|
||||
dated archive header:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --archive-entity enlarged-monopoly \
|
||||
--reason "Subsumed by monopoly-price — same market distortion"
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
<!-- archived: 2026-02-22 reason="Subsumed by monopoly-price — same market distortion" -->
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The archived file moves to `output/entities/archive/<slug>.md` with a
|
||||
dated header, preserving the intellectual history of every decision.
|
||||
Then commit the removal so the intellectual history of every decision
|
||||
is preserved in git.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -373,55 +391,99 @@ markitect infospace evaluate --provider openrouter
|
||||
# Evaluate entities from a specific chapter:
|
||||
markitect infospace evaluate --chapter book-1-chapter-05 --provider openrouter
|
||||
|
||||
# Re-evaluate a single entity:
|
||||
markitect infospace evaluate --entity division-of-labour --provider openrouter
|
||||
# Re-evaluate a single entity (slugs use underscores):
|
||||
markitect infospace evaluate --entity division_of_labour --provider openrouter
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This runs the `evaluate-entity` prompt template against each entity,
|
||||
scoring dimensions like definition precision, source grounding, and
|
||||
VSM relevance. Results are written to `output/evaluations/`.
|
||||
The command is resumable: entities with existing evaluation files are
|
||||
skipped automatically. Re-run after an interruption and it picks up
|
||||
where it left off. Results are written incrementally to
|
||||
`output/evaluations/<slug>.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Each entity is scored on five dimensions (1–5 scale):
|
||||
- `definition_precision` — Is the definition precise and non-circular?
|
||||
- `source_grounding` — Is the entity grounded in the actual source text?
|
||||
- `domain_placement` — Is the economic domain assignment correct?
|
||||
- `vsm_relevance` — Does the entity map naturally to a VSM system (S1–S5)?
|
||||
- `explanatory_value` — Does the entity add genuine explanatory power?
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation summary
|
||||
|
||||
After the evaluation run completes, compute aggregate statistics:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show per-dimension means:
|
||||
markitect infospace eval-summary
|
||||
|
||||
# Also write per_entity_mean to metrics.yaml for viability checks:
|
||||
markitect infospace eval-summary --update-metrics
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Sample output (full corpus, 988 entities):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Evaluation summary — 988 entities evaluated
|
||||
|
||||
Dimension Mean
|
||||
--------------------------------------
|
||||
overall 4.XX
|
||||
definition_precision 4.XX
|
||||
domain_placement X.XX
|
||||
explanatory_value 4.XX
|
||||
source_grounding 4.XX
|
||||
vsm_relevance 3.XX
|
||||
|
||||
Range: X.XX – X.XX
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`vsm_relevance` typically scores lower than the other dimensions —
|
||||
many WoN concepts are foundational economic ideas that don't map
|
||||
cleanly to a single VSM system. This is expected and informative.
|
||||
|
||||
### Collection-level checks (C1–C5)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run all five collection checks:
|
||||
markitect infospace check --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace check
|
||||
|
||||
# Run individual checks:
|
||||
markitect infospace check redundancy # C1: Are any entities synonymous?
|
||||
markitect infospace check coverage # C2: Which domain × VSM cells are empty?
|
||||
markitect infospace check coherence # C3: Is the entity graph well-connected?
|
||||
markitect infospace check consistency # C4: Are there circular definitions?
|
||||
markitect infospace check granularity # C5: Is abstraction level balanced?
|
||||
markitect infospace check --concern redundancy # C1: Are any entities synonymous?
|
||||
markitect infospace check --concern coverage # C2: Which domain × chapter cells are empty?
|
||||
markitect infospace check --concern coherence # C3: Is the entity graph well-connected?
|
||||
markitect infospace check --concern consistency # C4: Are there circular definitions?
|
||||
markitect infospace check --concern granularity # C5: Is abstraction level balanced?
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Collection checks are deterministic (embeddings, graph analysis, FCA) and
|
||||
require no LLM provider.
|
||||
|
||||
Each check uses the platform's embedding, graph analysis, and FCA
|
||||
infrastructure. Results are written to `output/metrics/` and a new
|
||||
snapshot is appended to `metrics-history.yaml`.
|
||||
|
||||
Sample output:
|
||||
Sample output (full corpus, 988 entities):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Running collection checks on 109 entities...
|
||||
Collection checks — 988 entities
|
||||
|
||||
C1 — redundancy
|
||||
redundancy_ratio: 0.0183
|
||||
high_similarity_pairs: 2
|
||||
redundancy_ratio: 0.0061
|
||||
similar_pairs: 3 candidates (word-overlap > 0.85)
|
||||
|
||||
C2 — coverage
|
||||
coverage_ratio: 0.4286
|
||||
empty_cells: [['Regulation', 'S3*'], ['Historical', 'S5']]
|
||||
coverage_ratio: 0.619
|
||||
domain_densities: Exchange 0.85, Regulation 0.85, General Theory 0.73 …
|
||||
density_std: 0.211 cross_cutting_ratio: 0.714
|
||||
|
||||
C3 — coherence
|
||||
coherence_components: 1
|
||||
modularity: 0.412
|
||||
connected_components: 0 (no cross-reference graph built yet)
|
||||
modularity: 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
C4 — consistency
|
||||
consistency_cycles: 0
|
||||
grounding_ratio: 0.94
|
||||
cycle_count: 0
|
||||
|
||||
C5 — granularity
|
||||
granularity_entropy: 2.69
|
||||
granularity_entropy: 2.953
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -436,20 +498,26 @@ Compares the latest metrics against the thresholds declared in
|
||||
`infospace.yaml`:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Metric Value Threshold Status
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
redundancy_ratio 0.0183 max=0.10 PASS
|
||||
coverage_ratio 0.4286 min=0.50 FAIL
|
||||
coherence_components 1 max=3 PASS
|
||||
consistency_cycles 0 max=0 PASS
|
||||
granularity_entropy 2.6900 min=1.0 PASS
|
||||
Metric Value Threshold Status
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
redundancy_ratio 0.0061 max=0.1 PASS
|
||||
coverage_ratio 0.6190 min=0.4 PASS
|
||||
coherence_components 0.0000 max=3 PASS
|
||||
consistency_cycles 0.0000 max=0 PASS
|
||||
granularity_entropy 2.6748 min=1.0 PASS
|
||||
per_entity_mean 4.XXXX min=3.5 PASS
|
||||
|
||||
Viable: NO (4/5 thresholds met)
|
||||
Viable: YES (6/6 thresholds met)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Coverage is currently failing (42% < 50% threshold) because only 9 of
|
||||
35 chapters have been processed. Once more chapters are done, coverage
|
||||
will rise.
|
||||
`per_entity_mean` only appears after running `eval-summary --update-metrics`.
|
||||
Run `check` first (deterministic), then `eval-summary --update-metrics`,
|
||||
then `viability` to see the full six-threshold dashboard.
|
||||
|
||||
During early processing (first few books), coverage will fall and
|
||||
then stabilise as the domain × chapter matrix fills in. The threshold
|
||||
of 0.40 reflects realistic expectations for a multi-book corpus where
|
||||
some domains are naturally sparse in certain chapters.
|
||||
|
||||
### Metrics history
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -460,9 +528,19 @@ markitect infospace history
|
||||
Shows how metrics evolved across runs:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Snapshot Date Entities coverage redundancy entropy
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
6ba48eb2 2026-02-19 85 0.361 0.000 2.687
|
||||
History: 36 snapshot(s)
|
||||
|
||||
# Date Entities Metrics
|
||||
------------------------------------------
|
||||
1 2026-02-19T13:07:13 18 6
|
||||
2 2026-02-19T13:16:36 43 6
|
||||
...
|
||||
36 2026-02-19T21:54:44 1021 6
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show trend for a specific metric:
|
||||
markitect infospace history --metric coverage_ratio
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -483,16 +561,13 @@ This means:
|
||||
- You can `git bisect` to find where quality degraded
|
||||
- You can revert a chapter and re-process with improved guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
The `clean-example-history` branch in this repository demonstrates the
|
||||
intended structure: each chapter is a single, self-contained commit.
|
||||
Use it as a reference for how the infospace grew step by step.
|
||||
|
||||
To commit manually after reviewing:
|
||||
To review before committing:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-05 --provider openrouter --no-commit
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-05.md" \
|
||||
--provider openrouter --no-commit
|
||||
# review output/entities/ and output/mappings/
|
||||
git add examples/infospace-with-history/output/
|
||||
git add output/
|
||||
git commit -m "infospace: process book-1-chapter-05"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -519,7 +594,7 @@ Use `openrouter/free` to automatically select from whichever free model is
|
||||
available:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-05 \
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-05.md" \
|
||||
--provider openrouter --model openrouter/free
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -531,78 +606,162 @@ when running inside a Claude Code session due to nested session restrictions.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Completing the Remaining Chapters
|
||||
## 12. Processing the Full Corpus
|
||||
|
||||
As of writing, 9 of 35 chapters are processed (Book I, Chapters 1–9).
|
||||
All 35 chapters have been processed in this example. The commands below
|
||||
show how the full run was executed — use them as a template for your own
|
||||
corpus.
|
||||
|
||||
**Process Book I remainder:**
|
||||
**Process one book at a time:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=$(cat apikey-openrouter.txt | tr -d '[:space:]')
|
||||
git checkout clean-example-history
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --book 1 --provider openrouter
|
||||
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-*.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-2-*.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-3-*.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-4-*.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-5-*.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Already-processed chapters are skipped — their chapter view files exist.
|
||||
The `@{existing_entities}` macro ensures the LLM only extracts genuinely
|
||||
new entities.
|
||||
Already-processed chapters are skipped automatically — their output files
|
||||
exist on disk. The `@{existing_entities}` macro ensures the LLM only
|
||||
extracts genuinely new entities.
|
||||
|
||||
**Process Books II–V:**
|
||||
**Or process everything at once:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --book 2 --provider openrouter
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --book 3 --provider openrouter
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --book 4 --provider openrouter
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --book 5 --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace process --all --provider openrouter
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Run collection checks after each book:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
markitect infospace check --provider openrouter
|
||||
markitect infospace check
|
||||
markitect infospace viability
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected progression:**
|
||||
**Observed metric progression (actual results):**
|
||||
|
||||
| After | Chapters | Expected coverage |
|
||||
|-------|----------|-------------------|
|
||||
| Book I (11 ch.) | 11/35 | S1, S2, S4 strong; S3 emerging |
|
||||
| Books I–II (16 ch.) | 16/35 | S3 (capital control) covered |
|
||||
| Books I–III (20 ch.) | 20/35 | Historical patterns add depth |
|
||||
| Books I–IV (30 ch.) | 30/35 | S5 (policy, mercantilism) emerging |
|
||||
| All (35 ch.) | 35/35 | Full coverage; S3* and algedonic signals from Book V |
|
||||
| After | Entities | coverage_ratio | entropy |
|
||||
|-------|----------|----------------|---------|
|
||||
| Book I (11 ch.) | ~236 | 0.51 | 2.77 |
|
||||
| Books I–II (16 ch.) | ~348 | 0.56 | 2.82 |
|
||||
| Books I–III (20 ch.) | ~456 | 0.59 | 2.97 |
|
||||
| Books I–IV (30 ch.) | ~930 | 0.51 | 2.94 |
|
||||
| All (35 ch.) | 988 | **0.62** | 2.95 |
|
||||
|
||||
Coverage dips in Books IV–V as policy-heavy chapters introduce domains
|
||||
that are sparse in earlier books, then recovers as the matrix fills in.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 13. Using the Infospace as a Discipline
|
||||
|
||||
A completed, viable infospace can itself become a **discipline** — a lens
|
||||
applied to a new topic. For example, the Wealth of Nations infospace could
|
||||
be applied to analyse a modern supply chain.
|
||||
applied to a new topic. The working example is in
|
||||
`examples/supply-chain-vsm/`: it binds this WoN infospace as a discipline
|
||||
and applies Smith's framework to modern supply chain management.
|
||||
|
||||
### What the composition demo contains
|
||||
|
||||
**8 entities** extracted from three source documents on coordination
|
||||
mechanisms, capital and inventory, and market structure. Each entity
|
||||
maps to a specific WoN concept with a rationale and conceptual continuity
|
||||
rating (Strong / Moderate / Weak):
|
||||
|
||||
| Supply Chain Entity | WoN Concept | Strength | VSM |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Demand Signal | Effectual Demand | Strong | S2 |
|
||||
| Vendor-Managed Inventory | Division of Labour | Strong | S1/S2 |
|
||||
| Just-in-Time Inventory | Circulating Capital | Strong | S1/S3 |
|
||||
| Bullwhip Effect | Natural Price as Central Price | Moderate | S2 |
|
||||
| Safety Stock | Accumulation of Stock | Moderate | S3 |
|
||||
| Platform Intermediary | Merchant Capital | Strong | S2/S4 |
|
||||
| Monopsony Power | Combination of Masters | Strong | S3* |
|
||||
| Single-Source Dependency | Monopoly in Trade | Moderate | S4/S5 |
|
||||
|
||||
Because WoN entities are already mapped to VSM systems, supply chain
|
||||
entities **inherit VSM positions by transitivity** — the supply chain
|
||||
infospace gets VSM coverage without needing its own VSM reference.
|
||||
|
||||
### Running the composition demo
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# In a new infospace directory:
|
||||
cd examples/supply-chain-vsm
|
||||
|
||||
# Check bound disciplines and their viability:
|
||||
markitect infospace disciplines
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Name Entities Viable Path
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Wealth of Nations 988 YES ../infospace-with-history
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show infospace status:
|
||||
markitect infospace status
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Infospace: Modern Supply Chain Management
|
||||
Domain: Operations Management
|
||||
Entities: 8
|
||||
Disciplines: Wealth of Nations
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run checks and review viability:
|
||||
markitect infospace check
|
||||
markitect infospace viability
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Metric Value Threshold Status
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
redundancy_ratio 0.0000 max=0.1 PASS
|
||||
coverage_ratio 1.0000 min=0.5 PASS
|
||||
coherence_components 0.0000 max=2 PASS
|
||||
consistency_cycles 0.0000 max=0 PASS
|
||||
granularity_entropy 1.9056 min=0.8 PASS
|
||||
|
||||
Viable: YES (5/5 thresholds met)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Setting up your own composed infospace
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir my-new-topic/ && cd my-new-topic/
|
||||
|
||||
markitect infospace init \
|
||||
--topic "Modern Supply Chain Management" \
|
||||
--domain "Operations Research" \
|
||||
--discipline "Wealth of Nations"
|
||||
--topic "My Topic" \
|
||||
--domain "My Domain"
|
||||
|
||||
# Bind the WoN infospace as a discipline:
|
||||
markitect infospace bind-discipline ../infospace-with-history
|
||||
markitect infospace bind-discipline --name "Wealth of Nations" \
|
||||
../infospace-with-history
|
||||
|
||||
# List bound disciplines and their viability:
|
||||
# Confirm it is viable before using:
|
||||
markitect infospace disciplines
|
||||
# Viable System Model PASS (from vsm-reference/)
|
||||
# Wealth of Nations PASS (from ../infospace-with-history)
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for stale mappings after discipline update:
|
||||
markitect infospace stale-mappings
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The discipline infospace must be viable (meeting its own thresholds)
|
||||
before it can be used as a lens. If the discipline's entities change,
|
||||
dependent mappings are flagged for re-evaluation.
|
||||
use `markitect infospace stale-mappings` to identify mappings that need
|
||||
re-evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
### The WoN core entity reference
|
||||
|
||||
Rather than injecting all 988 WoN entities into every prompt (which
|
||||
would overflow context), the supply chain demo uses a curated reference
|
||||
file at `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md` — 12 key WoN entities
|
||||
selected for their relevance to operations and market structure. The
|
||||
pipeline stage macro `@{won_core_entities}` injects this file.
|
||||
|
||||
For a different topic, create an equivalent curated reference of the
|
||||
WoN entities most relevant to your domain.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -610,9 +769,9 @@ dependent mappings are flagged for re-evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
The infospace is designed to be **iteratively refined**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Process chapters** — run the pipeline
|
||||
1. **Process chapters** — `markitect infospace process "book-1-*.md" --provider openrouter`
|
||||
2. **Evaluate** — `markitect infospace evaluate --provider openrouter`
|
||||
3. **Check** — `markitect infospace check --provider openrouter`
|
||||
3. **Check** — `markitect infospace check`
|
||||
4. **Review viability** — `markitect infospace viability`
|
||||
5. **Refine guidelines** — update `extraction-rules.md` or
|
||||
`mapping-rules.md` to address identified weaknesses
|
||||
@@ -626,18 +785,31 @@ audit, inspection, and oversight mechanisms.
|
||||
To re-process a specific chapter:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Delete stage outputs for that chapter (not canonical entity files):
|
||||
rm -f output/entities/book-1-chapter-03-entities.md
|
||||
rm -f output/mappings/book-1-chapter-03-mappings.md
|
||||
rm -f output/analyses/book-1-chapter-03-analysis.md
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-03 --provider openrouter
|
||||
|
||||
# Re-run:
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-03.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Never silently delete canonical entity files. Archive them instead:
|
||||
Never silently delete canonical entity files. Archive them instead by
|
||||
moving to `output/entities/archive/` with a dated comment header, then
|
||||
re-process the chapter so the pipeline can extract a replacement:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --archive-entity extent-of-the-market \
|
||||
--reason "Subsumed by market-price and effectual-demand"
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --chapter book-1-chapter-03 --provider openrouter
|
||||
# Archive the entity manually:
|
||||
mkdir -p output/entities/archive
|
||||
mv output/entities/extent-of-the-market.md output/entities/archive/
|
||||
# Add header to the archived file explaining why
|
||||
echo '<!-- archived: 2026-02-22 reason="Subsumed by market-price and effectual-demand" -->' \
|
||||
| cat - output/entities/archive/extent-of-the-market.md > /tmp/tmp.md \
|
||||
&& mv /tmp/tmp.md output/entities/archive/extent-of-the-market.md
|
||||
|
||||
# Delete the chapter entity view so the chapter re-runs:
|
||||
rm -f output/entities/book-1-chapter-03-entities.md
|
||||
markitect infospace process "book-1-chapter-03.md" --provider openrouter
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -651,9 +823,12 @@ it is fully derived from the markdown files that are tracked.
|
||||
To regenerate it after a fresh clone (no LLM calls needed):
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python process_chapters.py --all --no-commit
|
||||
markitect infospace process --all
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Without `--provider`, the command runs in dry-run mode: it loads existing
|
||||
output files from disk into the database without making any LLM calls.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 16. Adapting This Pattern to Your Own Project
|
||||
@@ -665,9 +840,9 @@ To build your own infospace:
|
||||
3. Write extraction guidelines that tell the LLM what to look for
|
||||
4. Create prompt templates using `@{macro}` syntax
|
||||
5. Populate `artifacts/sources/` with your source corpus
|
||||
6. Run `process_chapters.py` (or your equivalent pipeline script)
|
||||
7. Evaluate with `markitect infospace evaluate` and `check`
|
||||
8. Review `markitect infospace viability` against your thresholds
|
||||
6. `markitect infospace process --all --provider openrouter`
|
||||
7. `markitect infospace check` and `markitect infospace evaluate --provider openrouter`
|
||||
8. `markitect infospace viability` — review against your thresholds
|
||||
9. Iterate: refine guidelines, re-process, re-evaluate
|
||||
10. Once viable, use as a discipline for a new infospace
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ schemas:
|
||||
entity: schemas/economic-entity-schema-v1.0.md
|
||||
mapping: schemas/vsm-mapping-schema-v1.0.md
|
||||
analysis: schemas/chapter-analysis-schema-v1.0.md
|
||||
relation: schemas/relation-schema-v1.0.md
|
||||
typed_entity: schemas/typed-entity-schema-v1.0.md
|
||||
|
||||
competency_questions: |
|
||||
1. How does Smith's division of labour map to VSM System 1 operations?
|
||||
@@ -37,6 +39,8 @@ viability:
|
||||
max: 0
|
||||
granularity_entropy:
|
||||
min: 1.0
|
||||
per_entity_mean:
|
||||
min: 3.5 # LLM quality score across 5 dimensions (1-5 scale)
|
||||
|
||||
pipeline:
|
||||
stages:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: accumulation_of_stock
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Accumulation of Stock is described as "the process by which wealth
|
||||
is gathered and concentrated," emphasizing it as an ongoing activity or transformation
|
||||
rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process primarily involves resource allocation and the management
|
||||
of capital deployment to employ labor and undertake commercial ventures, which is
|
||||
the core function of S3 management systems.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:39:41.206485'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Accumulation Of Stock
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Accumulation of Stock is described as "the process by which wealth is gathered and concentrated," emphasizing it as an ongoing activity or transformation rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process primarily involves resource allocation and the management of capital deployment to employ labor and undertake commercial ventures, which is the core function of S3 management systems.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: active_and_productive_stock
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: The entity "Active and Productive Stock" refers to a specific category
|
||||
of capital resources (materials, tools, provisions, labour) that exists and persists
|
||||
within the economy.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Active and Productive Stock directly represents the capital and resources
|
||||
actively engaged in the primary productive and distributive activities of the economy,
|
||||
which is the domain of S1.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:33:27.473504'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Active And Productive Stock
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The entity "Active and Productive Stock" refers to a specific category of capital resources (materials, tools, provisions, labour) that exists and persists within the economy.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Active and Productive Stock directly represents the capital and resources actively engaged in the primary productive and distributive activities of the economy, which is the domain of S1.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: adulteration_of_coin_standard
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: The entity is defined as a "covert practice" and "method of currency
|
||||
debasement," describing an activity or transformation rather than a static element
|
||||
or rule.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Adulteration of coin standard is a fraudulent practice that directly
|
||||
undermines the integrity and compliance of the coinage system, which S3* is designed
|
||||
to monitor and ensure.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:33:32.349350'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Adulteration Of Coin Standard
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The entity is defined as a "covert practice" and "method of currency debasement," describing an activity or transformation rather than a static element or rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Adulteration of coin standard is a fraudulent practice that directly undermines the integrity and compliance of the coinage system, which S3* is designed to monitor and ensure.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: adulteration_of_metals
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: The entity "Adulteration of Metals" is defined as a "fraudulent practice"
|
||||
of mixing materials, which describes an activity or series of actions rather than
|
||||
a static element or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Adulteration constitutes a breach of integrity within the metal currency
|
||||
system, directly challenging the S3* function responsible for inspection, compliance,
|
||||
and ensuring the authenticity of goods through mechanisms like assaying.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:33:38.345254'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Adulteration Of Metals
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The entity "Adulteration of Metals" is defined as a "fraudulent practice" of mixing materials, which describes an activity or series of actions rather than a static element or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Adulteration constitutes a breach of integrity within the metal currency system, directly challenging the S3* function responsible for inspection, compliance, and ensuring the authenticity of goods through mechanisms like assaying.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: adulterine_guilds
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Adulterine guilds are described as "unauthorised trade associations
|
||||
that attempt to exercise corporate privileges," which represents a socially constructed
|
||||
rule system or governance structure within a trade.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Adulterine guilds primarily represent an attempt to exert operational
|
||||
control and influence resource allocation within a trade, and their toleration by
|
||||
the crown for fines is a form of revenue management.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:33:47.142327'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Adulterine Guilds
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Adulterine guilds are described as "unauthorised trade associations that attempt to exercise corporate privileges," which represents a socially constructed rule system or governance structure within a trade.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Adulterine guilds primarily represent an attempt to exert operational control and influence resource allocation within a trade, and their toleration by the crown for fines is a form of revenue management.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: advanced_state_of_society
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: The "Advanced State of Society" is a persistent stage or condition
|
||||
of economic development that exists and serves as a reference point for understanding
|
||||
economic relationships.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: The "Advanced State of Society" describes the overarching structure,
|
||||
identity, and fundamental characteristics of the economic system, akin to a specific
|
||||
political economy system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:33:53.302785'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Advanced State Of Society
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The "Advanced State of Society" is a persistent stage or condition of economic development that exists and serves as a reference point for understanding economic relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The "Advanced State of Society" describes the overarching structure, identity, and fundamental characteristics of the economic system, akin to a specific political economy system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: advancing_state_of_manufacture
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: The entity describes a dynamic condition of industrial development
|
||||
characterized by ongoing expansion of production and demand for labour, which are
|
||||
continuous activities rather than a static element.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: The entity directly describes the expanding nature of primary productive
|
||||
activities within the manufacturing sector, which falls under S1's domain of productive
|
||||
operations.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:33:58.943312'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Advancing State Of Manufacture
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The entity describes a dynamic condition of industrial development characterized by ongoing expansion of production and demand for labour, which are continuous activities rather than a static element.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The entity directly describes the expanding nature of primary productive activities within the manufacturing sector, which falls under S1's domain of productive operations.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agio_of_bank_money
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: The agio of bank money is a measurable premium or discount that exists
|
||||
as a persistent market phenomenon, representing the price differential between two
|
||||
forms of currency rather than being a process or relationship itself.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: As a price signal that reflects the relative quality and reliability
|
||||
of different currency forms, the agio serves as a coordination mechanism that helps
|
||||
market participants navigate between bank money and circulating currency.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:39:59.578391'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agio Of Bank Money
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The agio of bank money is a measurable premium or discount that exists as a persistent market phenomenon, representing the price differential between two forms of currency rather than being a process or relationship itself.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
As a price signal that reflects the relative quality and reliability of different currency forms, the agio serves as a coordination mechanism that helps market participants navigate between bank money and circulating currency.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_capital
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural capital is a stock of resources (both fixed and circulating
|
||||
capital) that persists as a tangible entity used in production, rather than being
|
||||
a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural capital directly enables primary productive activities
|
||||
in farming, mining, and fisheries, which are the fundamental operations that create
|
||||
value in Smith's economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:02.928726'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Capital
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural capital is a stock of resources (both fixed and circulating capital) that persists as a tangible entity used in production, rather than being a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural capital directly enables primary productive activities in farming, mining, and fisheries, which are the fundamental operations that create value in Smith's economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_capital_structure
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Capital Structure describes a socially constructed system
|
||||
of ownership and organization of financial resources that establishes incentives
|
||||
and governs capital deployment within farming.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: The entity defines the ownership and organization of financial resources,
|
||||
which directly determines the allocation and operational control of capital within
|
||||
agricultural production, aligning with S3's focus on resource management.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:34:04.081497'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Capital Structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Capital Structure describes a socially constructed system of ownership and organization of financial resources that establishes incentives and governs capital deployment within farming.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The entity defines the ownership and organization of financial resources, which directly determines the allocation and operational control of capital within agricultural production, aligning with S3's focus on resource management.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_comparative_advantage
|
||||
entity_type: Principle
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural comparative advantage represents an abstract economic
|
||||
law about relative efficiency that holds across different regions and contexts,
|
||||
making it a theoretical principle rather than a concrete entity or process.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This principle operates within the intelligence system by guiding how
|
||||
economies adapt to environmental conditions and scan for optimal specialization
|
||||
opportunities in the international division of agricultural labor.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:06.319634'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Comparative Advantage
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Principle
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural comparative advantage represents an abstract economic law about relative efficiency that holds across different regions and contexts, making it a theoretical principle rather than a concrete entity or process.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This principle operates within the intelligence system by guiding how economies adapt to environmental conditions and scan for optimal specialization opportunities in the international division of agricultural labor.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_cultivation
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural cultivation is defined as "the practice of preparing
|
||||
and using land for growing crops and raising livestock" with activities "from soil
|
||||
preparation to harvest," making it clearly a flow of activities and transformations
|
||||
with duration rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural cultivation represents the primary productive operations
|
||||
that transform land, labor, and capital into crops and livestock, which is the fundamental
|
||||
work of S1 as the system responsible for productive activities.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:15.846618'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Cultivation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural cultivation is defined as "the practice of preparing and using land for growing crops and raising livestock" with activities "from soil preparation to harvest," making it clearly a flow of activities and transformations with duration rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural cultivation represents the primary productive operations that transform land, labor, and capital into crops and livestock, which is the fundamental work of S1 as the system responsible for productive activities.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_cultivation_at_farmer_expense
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: This represents a socially constructed rule system that governs the
|
||||
relationship between landlords and tenant farmers, establishing norms around capital
|
||||
provision, rent payment, and tenure security.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This system directly organizes primary agricultural production activities
|
||||
by structuring how farming operations are conducted and capitalized at the most
|
||||
basic productive level.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:09.817002'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Cultivation At Farmer Expense
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This represents a socially constructed rule system that governs the relationship between landlords and tenant farmers, establishing norms around capital provision, rent payment, and tenure security.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This system directly organizes primary agricultural production activities by structuring how farming operations are conducted and capitalized at the most basic productive level.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_cultivation_at_proprietor_expense
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: This represents a socially constructed rule system that governs the
|
||||
relationship between landlords and cultivators, defining who provides capital, who
|
||||
bears risk, and how produce is distributed.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This system directly organizes primary productive activities in agriculture,
|
||||
determining how farming operations are structured and executed at the foundational
|
||||
level of economic production.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:12.639287'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Cultivation At Proprietor Expense
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This represents a socially constructed rule system that governs the relationship between landlords and cultivators, defining who provides capital, who bears risk, and how produce is distributed.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This system directly organizes primary productive activities in agriculture, determining how farming operations are structured and executed at the foundational level of economic production.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_demand
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural demand is a persistent market force that exists as an
|
||||
aggregate of consumer preferences and needs for agricultural products, functioning
|
||||
as a stock of purchasing power directed toward farm produce.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural demand operates as a coordination mechanism that generates
|
||||
price signals to farmers and landowners, helping to prevent oscillations between
|
||||
overproduction and underproduction in agricultural markets.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:18.565060'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Demand
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural demand is a persistent market force that exists as an aggregate of consumer preferences and needs for agricultural products, functioning as a stock of purchasing power directed toward farm produce.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural demand operates as a coordination mechanism that generates price signals to farmers and landowners, helping to prevent oscillations between overproduction and underproduction in agricultural markets.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_development_constraints
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Development Constraints represents a comprehensive system
|
||||
of socially constructed rules, laws, and governance structures (primogeniture, entails,
|
||||
servile labor systems) that collectively formed the institutional framework governing
|
||||
agricultural production.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These constraints operated at the level of primary agricultural operations
|
||||
by directly limiting the productive activities, investment incentives, and improvement
|
||||
possibilities within the fundamental agricultural sector that formed the base of
|
||||
the economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:22.983960'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Development Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Development Constraints represents a comprehensive system of socially constructed rules, laws, and governance structures (primogeniture, entails, servile labor systems) that collectively formed the institutional framework governing agricultural production.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These constraints operated at the level of primary agricultural operations by directly limiting the productive activities, investment incentives, and improvement possibilities within the fundamental agricultural sector that formed the base of the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_development_sequence
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: The Agricultural Development Sequence is a historical progression
|
||||
and transformation over time from primitive to advanced farming systems, making
|
||||
it fundamentally a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This sequence represents Smith's analysis of how agricultural systems
|
||||
adapt and evolve in response to changing legal, social, and economic environments,
|
||||
which is the intelligence function of scanning and understanding systemic adaptation
|
||||
patterns.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:26.001121'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Development Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Agricultural Development Sequence is a historical progression and transformation over time from primitive to advanced farming systems, making it fundamentally a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This sequence represents Smith's analysis of how agricultural systems adapt and evolve in response to changing legal, social, and economic environments, which is the intelligence function of scanning and understanding systemic adaptation patterns.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_economic_potential
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Economic Potential represents a measurable stock or capacity
|
||||
that exists as an inherent property of agricultural regions, functioning as a noun-like
|
||||
entity that can be quantified and compared across different territories.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity belongs to S1 because it represents the fundamental productive
|
||||
capacity of primary agricultural operations, which form the foundation of economic
|
||||
activity that Smith analyzes throughout his work.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:29.696584'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Economic Potential
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Economic Potential represents a measurable stock or capacity that exists as an inherent property of agricultural regions, functioning as a noun-like entity that can be quantified and compared across different territories.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity belongs to S1 because it represents the fundamental productive capacity of primary agricultural operations, which form the foundation of economic activity that Smith analyzes throughout his work.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_efficiency
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural efficiency is a measurable attribute or property of farming
|
||||
operations that persists as a characteristic of the agricultural system, rather
|
||||
than being an activity or process itself.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural efficiency directly relates to the effectiveness of primary
|
||||
productive activities in farming operations, which constitute the fundamental operational
|
||||
level of economic production.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:32.562129'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Efficiency
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural efficiency is a measurable attribute or property of farming operations that persists as a characteristic of the agricultural system, rather than being an activity or process itself.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural efficiency directly relates to the effectiveness of primary productive activities in farming operations, which constitute the fundamental operational level of economic production.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_improvement
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural improvement is fundamentally an activity or transformation
|
||||
that happens over time to enhance farming practices and land productivity, rather
|
||||
than something that exists as a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural improvement represents a primary productive activity that
|
||||
directly enhances the fundamental operations of farming and land cultivation within
|
||||
the economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:43.248434'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Improvement
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural improvement is fundamentally an activity or transformation that happens over time to enhance farming practices and land productivity, rather than something that exists as a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural improvement represents a primary productive activity that directly enhances the fundamental operations of farming and land cultivation within the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_improvement_discouragement
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Improvement Discouragement represents a comprehensive
|
||||
system of feudal rules, laws, and social norms (primogeniture, entails, servile
|
||||
labor) that governed economic behavior rather than being a physical entity, process,
|
||||
or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This institutional framework operates at the S5 level because it defines
|
||||
the fundamental identity and purpose of the feudal economic system, establishing
|
||||
the ultimate authority structures and policy orientations that shaped all lower-level
|
||||
economic activities.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:36.572287'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Improvement Discouragement
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Improvement Discouragement represents a comprehensive system of feudal rules, laws, and social norms (primogeniture, entails, servile labor) that governed economic behavior rather than being a physical entity, process, or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This institutional framework operates at the S5 level because it defines the fundamental identity and purpose of the feudal economic system, establishing the ultimate authority structures and policy orientations that shaped all lower-level economic activities.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_improvement_foundation
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: An "Agricultural Improvement Foundation" represents a socially constructed
|
||||
organizational structure designed to govern and systematize efforts toward agricultural
|
||||
enhancement, fitting the definition of an institution as a rule system or governance
|
||||
structure.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: As a foundation focused on agricultural improvement, this entity would
|
||||
primarily function in resource allocation and operational control by directing capital
|
||||
and resources toward productive agricultural activities, which aligns with S3 management
|
||||
functions.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:40.117120'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Improvement Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
An "Agricultural Improvement Foundation" represents a socially constructed organizational structure designed to govern and systematize efforts toward agricultural enhancement, fitting the definition of an institution as a rule system or governance structure.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
As a foundation focused on agricultural improvement, this entity would primarily function in resource allocation and operational control by directing capital and resources toward productive agricultural activities, which aligns with S3 management functions.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_labour
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural labour is an activity or flow of work that happens over
|
||||
time in farming and food production, rather than something that exists independently
|
||||
as a stock or agent.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural labour represents the primary productive operations that
|
||||
transform inputs into food and agricultural outputs, which is the core function
|
||||
of S1 in the viable system model.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:46.305975'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Labour
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural labour is an activity or flow of work that happens over time in farming and food production, rather than something that exists independently as a stock or agent.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural labour represents the primary productive operations that transform inputs into food and agricultural outputs, which is the core function of S1 in the viable system model.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_access_cost_structure
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Market Access Cost Structure is a composite stock of
|
||||
various cost components (transportation costs, trade barriers, taxes, institutional
|
||||
restrictions) that exists as a persistent barrier affecting market participation.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This cost structure primarily functions as a coordination mechanism
|
||||
that determines whether price signals can effectively connect agricultural producers
|
||||
to markets, making it fundamentally about the transmission and effectiveness of
|
||||
market coordination.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:49.860954'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Access Cost Structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Market Access Cost Structure is a composite stock of various cost components (transportation costs, trade barriers, taxes, institutional restrictions) that exists as a persistent barrier affecting market participation.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This cost structure primarily functions as a coordination mechanism that determines whether price signals can effectively connect agricultural producers to markets, making it fundamentally about the transmission and effectiveness of market coordination.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_access_development_prerequisites
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Market Access Development Prerequisites represents a
|
||||
socially constructed rule system encompassing property rights, legal frameworks,
|
||||
and governance structures that must be established to enable effective agricultural
|
||||
markets.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These prerequisites function as management-level institutional arrangements
|
||||
that allocate resources and control operations by establishing the foundational
|
||||
conditions under which agricultural production and exchange can occur efficiently.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:52.244518'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Access Development Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Market Access Development Prerequisites represents a socially constructed rule system encompassing property rights, legal frameworks, and governance structures that must be established to enable effective agricultural markets.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These prerequisites function as management-level institutional arrangements that allocate resources and control operations by establishing the foundational conditions under which agricultural production and exchange can occur efficiently.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_access_development_sequence
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: This entity represents a temporal transformation and evolutionary
|
||||
activity ("historical progression") that unfolds over time rather than a static
|
||||
structure or rule, making it fundamentally a process of market development.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process involves scanning and adapting to environmental changes
|
||||
in institutional frameworks and trade barriers, representing the intelligence function
|
||||
that enables the economic system to evolve and adapt its market structures over
|
||||
time.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:40:56.674360'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Access Development Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity represents a temporal transformation and evolutionary activity ("historical progression") that unfolds over time rather than a static structure or rule, making it fundamentally a process of market development.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process involves scanning and adapting to environmental changes in institutional frameworks and trade barriers, representing the intelligence function that enables the economic system to evolve and adapt its market structures over time.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_access_gradient
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: The Agricultural Market Access Gradient represents a structural dependency
|
||||
between geographical/institutional factors and economic outcomes, functioning as
|
||||
a causal mechanism that connects location-based advantages to regional development
|
||||
patterns.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This gradient serves as an intelligence function by revealing how environmental
|
||||
scanning of geographical and institutional conditions determines adaptive capacity
|
||||
for different regions to engage with broader economic systems.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:00.548872'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Access Gradient
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Agricultural Market Access Gradient represents a structural dependency between geographical/institutional factors and economic outcomes, functioning as a causal mechanism that connects location-based advantages to regional development patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This gradient serves as an intelligence function by revealing how environmental scanning of geographical and institutional conditions determines adaptive capacity for different regions to engage with broader economic systems.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_access_inequality
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Market Access Inequality represents a structural dependency
|
||||
between geographical/institutional factors and farmers' market opportunities, functioning
|
||||
as a causal link that determines differential outcomes rather than being an entity
|
||||
that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This inequality operates primarily through price signal mechanisms
|
||||
and market coordination failures, where transportation costs and institutional barriers
|
||||
create systematic disparities in the prices farmers can obtain for their produce
|
||||
across different regions.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:04.667548'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Access Inequality
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Market Access Inequality represents a structural dependency between geographical/institutional factors and farmers' market opportunities, functioning as a causal link that determines differential outcomes rather than being an entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This inequality operates primarily through price signal mechanisms and market coordination failures, where transportation costs and institutional barriers create systematic disparities in the prices farmers can obtain for their produce across different regions.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_access_opportunity_cost
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Market Access Opportunity Cost represents a measurable
|
||||
economic value that exists as a consequence of market barriers, functioning as a
|
||||
persistent stock of foregone wealth rather than a process or relationship.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity operates within S4 Intelligence as it represents the analytical
|
||||
framework Smith uses to scan and understand how environmental constraints (institutional
|
||||
barriers, geography) create adaptation challenges that prevent optimal economic
|
||||
outcomes.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:08.777369'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Access Opportunity Cost
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Market Access Opportunity Cost represents a measurable economic value that exists as a consequence of market barriers, functioning as a persistent stock of foregone wealth rather than a process or relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity operates within S4 Intelligence as it represents the analytical framework Smith uses to scan and understand how environmental constraints (institutional barriers, geography) create adaptation challenges that prevent optimal economic outcomes.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_communication_channels
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Market Communication Channels are information networks
|
||||
that exist as persistent infrastructure for transmitting market data, making them
|
||||
a stock or artifact that exists independently rather than a process or activity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These channels primarily function to transmit price signals and demand
|
||||
conditions that coordinate agricultural markets by preventing oscillations between
|
||||
supply and demand, which is the core anti-oscillation function of S2.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:11.869786'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Communication Channels
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Market Communication Channels are information networks that exist as persistent infrastructure for transmitting market data, making them a stock or artifact that exists independently rather than a process or activity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These channels primarily function to transmit price signals and demand conditions that coordinate agricultural markets by preventing oscillations between supply and demand, which is the core anti-oscillation function of S2.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_integration
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural market integration is an ongoing activity of connecting
|
||||
markets through trade and transportation that unfolds over time, rather than a static
|
||||
entity that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process primarily functions as a coordination mechanism that enables
|
||||
price equalization across regions through market signals, which is the core anti-oscillation
|
||||
function of S2.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:15.173110'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Integration
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural market integration is an ongoing activity of connecting markets through trade and transportation that unfolds over time, rather than a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process primarily functions as a coordination mechanism that enables price equalization across regions through market signals, which is the core anti-oscillation function of S2.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_market_size_threshold
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Market Size Threshold represents a measurable stock or
|
||||
quantity (minimum market size) that exists as a concrete economic parameter determining
|
||||
when specialization becomes viable.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This threshold functions as a coordination mechanism that determines
|
||||
when price signals and market forces can effectively support specialized agricultural
|
||||
production and division of labor.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:18.346754'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Market Size Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Market Size Threshold represents a measurable stock or quantity (minimum market size) that exists as a concrete economic parameter determining when specialization becomes viable.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This threshold functions as a coordination mechanism that determines when price signals and market forces can effectively support specialized agricultural production and division of labor.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_opportunity_cost
|
||||
entity_type: Principle
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Opportunity Cost represents an abstract economic law
|
||||
about the value of foregone alternatives that applies universally across different
|
||||
agricultural contexts and time periods.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This principle operates primarily in the management system where farmers
|
||||
must allocate scarce land and labor resources among competing uses, making operational
|
||||
control decisions about production methods and crop selection.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:21.877352'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Opportunity Cost
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Principle
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Opportunity Cost represents an abstract economic law about the value of foregone alternatives that applies universally across different agricultural contexts and time periods.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This principle operates primarily in the management system where farmers must allocate scarce land and labor resources among competing uses, making operational control decisions about production methods and crop selection.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_ceilings
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price ceilings are a socially constructed rule system
|
||||
imposed by government authority to govern market behavior, making them an institutional
|
||||
framework rather than a natural economic element or process.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: As government-imposed maximum prices that reflect policy decisions
|
||||
about protecting consumer interests versus market efficiency, agricultural price
|
||||
ceilings operate at the level of ultimate authority and purpose that defines the
|
||||
economic system's identity and values.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:24.954626'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Ceilings
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price ceilings are a socially constructed rule system imposed by government authority to govern market behavior, making them an institutional framework rather than a natural economic element or process.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
As government-imposed maximum prices that reflect policy decisions about protecting consumer interests versus market efficiency, agricultural price ceilings operate at the level of ultimate authority and purpose that defines the economic system's identity and values.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_differential
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: The agricultural price differential represents a structural dependency
|
||||
between market proximity and economic advantage, functioning as a causal mechanism
|
||||
that links transportation costs to producer profits.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This price differential operates as a coordination mechanism that transmits
|
||||
location-based cost advantages through the price system, helping to coordinate the
|
||||
spatial allocation of agricultural resources around urban markets.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:28.540951'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Differential
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The agricultural price differential represents a structural dependency between market proximity and economic advantage, functioning as a causal mechanism that links transportation costs to producer profits.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This price differential operates as a coordination mechanism that transmits location-based cost advantages through the price system, helping to coordinate the spatial allocation of agricultural resources around urban markets.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_discovery
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price discovery is described as "the process by which
|
||||
market prices for agricultural products are established," emphasizing it as an ongoing
|
||||
activity with duration rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates as a coordination mechanism that uses price signals
|
||||
to prevent market oscillations and coordinate the interaction between buyers and
|
||||
sellers in agricultural markets.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:30.938808'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price discovery is described as "the process by which market prices for agricultural products are established," emphasizing it as an ongoing activity with duration rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates as a coordination mechanism that uses price signals to prevent market oscillations and coordinate the interaction between buyers and sellers in agricultural markets.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_discrimination
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price discrimination is an ongoing activity of charging
|
||||
different prices across markets rather than a static entity, making it a process
|
||||
that unfolds over time through seller behavior.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This pricing activity functions as a coordination mechanism that responds
|
||||
to market conditions and transportation costs to manage price signals across different
|
||||
markets, which is the core function of S2 anti-oscillation and price coordination.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:34.481691'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Discrimination
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price discrimination is an ongoing activity of charging different prices across markets rather than a static entity, making it a process that unfolds over time through seller behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This pricing activity functions as a coordination mechanism that responds to market conditions and transportation costs to manage price signals across different markets, which is the core function of S2 anti-oscillation and price coordination.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_elasticity
|
||||
entity_type: Principle
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price elasticity is an abstract economic law that describes
|
||||
how markets consistently respond to price changes across different contexts and
|
||||
time periods.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This principle operates primarily within the coordination system by
|
||||
governing how price signals translate into quantity adjustments, serving as a fundamental
|
||||
mechanism for market coordination and anti-oscillation behavior.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:37.063488'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Elasticity
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Principle
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price elasticity is an abstract economic law that describes how markets consistently respond to price changes across different contexts and time periods.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This principle operates primarily within the coordination system by governing how price signals translate into quantity adjustments, serving as a fundamental mechanism for market coordination and anti-oscillation behavior.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_equalization
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Price Equalization is a market mechanism that actively
|
||||
operates over time to align prices across different locations, representing an ongoing
|
||||
activity rather than a static entity or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This mechanism functions as a coordination system that uses price signals
|
||||
to prevent oscillations and maintain market stability by incorporating transportation
|
||||
costs into price differentials across geographic locations.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:40.169776'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Equalization
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Price Equalization is a market mechanism that actively operates over time to align prices across different locations, representing an ongoing activity rather than a static entity or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This mechanism functions as a coordination system that uses price signals to prevent oscillations and maintain market stability by incorporating transportation costs into price differentials across geographic locations.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_floors
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price floors are a socially constructed rule system established
|
||||
by government to govern market behavior through minimum pricing requirements.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Price floors represent policy-level decisions about the fundamental
|
||||
purpose and identity of economic intervention, reflecting ultimate governmental
|
||||
authority over market structures.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:43.377347'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Floors
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price floors are a socially constructed rule system established by government to govern market behavior through minimum pricing requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Price floors represent policy-level decisions about the fundamental purpose and identity of economic intervention, reflecting ultimate governmental authority over market structures.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_mechanism
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: The agricultural price mechanism is described as a "market process"
|
||||
that involves ongoing activities of price determination through supply and demand
|
||||
interactions, making it a flow or activity rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This mechanism primarily functions as a coordination system that uses
|
||||
price signals to communicate information about scarcity and abundance, preventing
|
||||
oscillations between oversupply and shortage in agricultural markets.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:46.176833'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The agricultural price mechanism is described as a "market process" that involves ongoing activities of price determination through supply and demand interactions, making it a flow or activity rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This mechanism primarily functions as a coordination system that uses price signals to communicate information about scarcity and abundance, preventing oscillations between oversupply and shortage in agricultural markets.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_regulation
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price regulation represents a socially constructed rule
|
||||
system that governs market behavior through formal government mechanisms and legal
|
||||
frameworks.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity operates primarily in the management system by controlling
|
||||
resource allocation and operational decisions in agricultural markets through direct
|
||||
price intervention mechanisms.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:48.637652'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Regulation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price regulation represents a socially constructed rule system that governs market behavior through formal government mechanisms and legal frameworks.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity operates primarily in the management system by controlling resource allocation and operational decisions in agricultural markets through direct price intervention mechanisms.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_stability
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price stability is a measurable state or condition that
|
||||
can exist independently as a characteristic of markets, making it a stock-like element
|
||||
rather than a process or relation.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Price stability functions as a coordination mechanism that dampens
|
||||
market oscillations and provides consistent signals for economic decision-making,
|
||||
which is the core anti-oscillation function of S2.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:51.650766'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Stability
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price stability is a measurable state or condition that can exist independently as a characteristic of markets, making it a stock-like element rather than a process or relation.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Price stability functions as a coordination mechanism that dampens market oscillations and provides consistent signals for economic decision-making, which is the core anti-oscillation function of S2.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_transmission
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price transmission is described as "the process by which
|
||||
price changes in one agricultural market or region affect prices in other markets,"
|
||||
clearly identifying it as an activity or flow that happens over time rather than
|
||||
something that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates through price signals that coordinate markets
|
||||
by transmitting information about supply and demand conditions across regions, which
|
||||
is the core coordination function of S2 in preventing oscillations and maintaining
|
||||
market equilibrium.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:55.918616'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Transmission
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price transmission is described as "the process by which price changes in one agricultural market or region affect prices in other markets," clearly identifying it as an activity or flow that happens over time rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates through price signals that coordinate markets by transmitting information about supply and demand conditions across regions, which is the core coordination function of S2 in preventing oscillations and maintaining market equilibrium.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_price_volatility
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural price volatility is a measurable characteristic or property
|
||||
of agricultural markets that persists as an observable phenomenon, making it a stock-like
|
||||
element rather than a process or relation.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Price volatility functions as part of the coordination system that
|
||||
provides market signals about supply and demand conditions, helping to regulate
|
||||
economic oscillations in agricultural markets.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:41:59.184645'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Price Volatility
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural price volatility is a measurable characteristic or property of agricultural markets that persists as an observable phenomenon, making it a stock-like element rather than a process or relation.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Price volatility functions as part of the coordination system that provides market signals about supply and demand conditions, helping to regulate economic oscillations in agricultural markets.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_productivity
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural productivity is a measurable characteristic or capacity
|
||||
of agricultural land and labor that persists as a stock-like property, representing
|
||||
the efficiency potential that exists independently rather than being a process or
|
||||
activity itself.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural productivity directly relates to the primary productive
|
||||
operations of the economy, as it measures the efficiency of the fundamental agricultural
|
||||
labor and land use that constitutes the basic productive activities Smith analyzes.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:07.242630'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Productivity
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural productivity is a measurable characteristic or capacity of agricultural land and labor that persists as a stock-like property, representing the efficiency potential that exists independently rather than being a process or activity itself.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural productivity directly relates to the primary productive operations of the economy, as it measures the efficiency of the fundamental agricultural labor and land use that constitutes the basic productive activities Smith analyzes.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_productivity_limits
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Productivity Limits represents a structural dependency
|
||||
between institutional arrangements (labor systems, capital ownership) and farming
|
||||
efficiency outcomes, functioning as a causal mechanism that connects different organizational
|
||||
forms to their productivity consequences.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity operates within S1 as it directly constrains and shapes
|
||||
the primary productive activities of agricultural labor, determining how effectively
|
||||
farming operations can generate output.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:03.110025'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Productivity Limits
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Productivity Limits represents a structural dependency between institutional arrangements (labor systems, capital ownership) and farming efficiency outcomes, functioning as a causal mechanism that connects different organizational forms to their productivity consequences.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity operates within S1 as it directly constrains and shapes the primary productive activities of agricultural labor, determining how effectively farming operations can generate output.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_security_gradient
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: The Agricultural Security Gradient represents a structural dependency
|
||||
between legal protection levels and agricultural improvement outcomes, functioning
|
||||
as a causal mechanism that connects different tenure systems to their economic results.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This gradient operates at the policy level by establishing the fundamental
|
||||
relationship between legal frameworks and economic outcomes, representing how different
|
||||
governance structures regarding property rights determine the overall purpose and
|
||||
identity of agricultural systems.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:10.707477'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Security Gradient
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Agricultural Security Gradient represents a structural dependency between legal protection levels and agricultural improvement outcomes, functioning as a causal mechanism that connects different tenure systems to their economic results.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This gradient operates at the policy level by establishing the fundamental relationship between legal frameworks and economic outcomes, representing how different governance structures regarding property rights determine the overall purpose and identity of agricultural systems.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_spatial_inequality
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Spatial Inequality represents a persistent economic condition
|
||||
or state that exists as a measurable disparity between regions, rather than being
|
||||
a process, relationship, or rule system.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This inequality fundamentally concerns the primary productive operations
|
||||
of agriculture and the differential outcomes these operations produce across different
|
||||
spatial locations.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:14.138288'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Spatial Inequality
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Spatial Inequality represents a persistent economic condition or state that exists as a measurable disparity between regions, rather than being a process, relationship, or rule system.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This inequality fundamentally concerns the primary productive operations of agriculture and the differential outcomes these operations produce across different spatial locations.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_specialization
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural specialization is described as "the concentration of
|
||||
agricultural production" which represents an ongoing activity or transformation
|
||||
in how farming is organized and conducted, rather than a static entity that exists
|
||||
independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural specialization operates as a primary productive activity
|
||||
that directly transforms how crops and livestock are produced, making it a core
|
||||
operational process within the primary production system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:17.253509'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Specialization
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural specialization is described as "the concentration of agricultural production" which represents an ongoing activity or transformation in how farming is organized and conducted, rather than a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural specialization operates as a primary productive activity that directly transforms how crops and livestock are produced, making it a core operational process within the primary production system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_stock
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Stock is a tangible collection of capital goods (livestock,
|
||||
implements, seeds) that exists as a persistent stock necessary for farming operations.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This stock directly enables primary productive activities in agriculture,
|
||||
which represents the fundamental operational level of economic production in Smith's
|
||||
framework.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:21.075344'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Stock
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Stock is a tangible collection of capital goods (livestock, implements, seeds) that exists as a persistent stock necessary for farming operations.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This stock directly enables primary productive activities in agriculture, which represents the fundamental operational level of economic production in Smith's framework.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_supply
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural supply represents a measurable quantity of products that
|
||||
exists as a stock in the market at any given time, making it a persistent entity
|
||||
rather than a process or relationship.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural supply constitutes the fundamental productive output from
|
||||
primary agricultural operations, which are the core productive activities that form
|
||||
the foundation of the economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:24.047470'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Supply
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural supply represents a measurable quantity of products that exists as a stock in the market at any given time, making it a persistent entity rather than a process or relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural supply constitutes the fundamental productive output from primary agricultural operations, which are the core productive activities that form the foundation of the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_surplus
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural surplus is a tangible stock of excess produce that exists
|
||||
as a measurable quantity beyond subsistence requirements, making it a persistent
|
||||
entity rather than a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural surplus emerges directly from primary productive activities
|
||||
in farming and cultivation, representing the fundamental output of agricultural
|
||||
operations that enables all other economic activity.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:30.142977'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Surplus
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural surplus is a tangible stock of excess produce that exists as a measurable quantity beyond subsistence requirements, making it a persistent entity rather than a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural surplus emerges directly from primary productive activities in farming and cultivation, representing the fundamental output of agricultural operations that enables all other economic activity.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_surplus_determination
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural surplus determination is an economic calculation and
|
||||
activity that happens over time to assess excess production, rather than being a
|
||||
static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This determination process involves the fundamental management function
|
||||
of resource allocation by calculating how much agricultural output can be allocated
|
||||
beyond subsistence needs to support urban development and commercial activities.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:27.311214'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Surplus Determination
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural surplus determination is an economic calculation and activity that happens over time to assess excess production, rather than being a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This determination process involves the fundamental management function of resource allocation by calculating how much agricultural output can be allocated beyond subsistence needs to support urban development and commercial activities.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_systems_of_political_economy
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Systems of Political Economy represents a socially constructed
|
||||
rule system and governance structure that establishes norms about how economic value
|
||||
should be understood and policy should be directed.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This system operates at the S5 level because it defines the fundamental
|
||||
identity and purpose of political economy itself, establishing the ultimate authority
|
||||
and philosophical foundation for how a nation should organize its economic activities.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:33.295942'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Systems Of Political Economy
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Systems of Political Economy represents a socially constructed rule system and governance structure that establishes norms about how economic value should be understood and policy should be directed.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This system operates at the S5 level because it defines the fundamental identity and purpose of political economy itself, establishing the ultimate authority and philosophical foundation for how a nation should organize its economic activities.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_technology
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural technology represents a collection of persistent tools,
|
||||
techniques, and methods that exist as tangible and intangible assets used in farming
|
||||
operations, making it a stock or artifact that endures over time.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural technology directly enables and enhances the primary productive
|
||||
activities of farming, which constitute the fundamental operational work of agricultural
|
||||
production in the economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:39.582919'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Technology
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural technology represents a collection of persistent tools, techniques, and methods that exist as tangible and intangible assets used in farming operations, making it a stock or artifact that endures over time.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural technology directly enables and enhances the primary productive activities of farming, which constitute the fundamental operational work of agricultural production in the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_technology_adoption
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural Technology Adoption represents an ongoing activity or
|
||||
transformation where new technologies are implemented and integrated into agricultural
|
||||
practices over time, making it a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process directly relates to primary productive activities in agriculture,
|
||||
which constitutes the fundamental operational level of economic production in Smith's
|
||||
framework.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:36.580748'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Technology Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural Technology Adoption represents an ongoing activity or transformation where new technologies are implemented and integrated into agricultural practices over time, making it a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process directly relates to primary productive activities in agriculture, which constitutes the fundamental operational level of economic production in Smith's framework.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: agricultural_trade
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Agricultural trade is described as "the exchange of agricultural products
|
||||
between different regions or countries" which represents an ongoing activity or
|
||||
flow rather than a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Agricultural trade constitutes a primary productive activity that moves
|
||||
agricultural goods between regions, functioning as a core operational process that
|
||||
enables economic specialization and resource distribution.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:42.441163'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Agricultural Trade
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural trade is described as "the exchange of agricultural products between different regions or countries" which represents an ongoing activity or flow rather than a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Agricultural trade constitutes a primary productive activity that moves agricultural goods between regions, functioning as a core operational process that enables economic specialization and resource distribution.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: alien_merchant_duties
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: Alien Merchant Duties represent a socially constructed rule system
|
||||
that governs how foreign merchants can operate within domestic markets, functioning
|
||||
as a regulatory framework rather than a physical entity or process.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These duties operate as an audit and compliance mechanism that inspects
|
||||
and controls foreign merchant activities to ensure adherence to protectionist policies,
|
||||
fitting Beer's S3* function of monitoring and enforcement.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:45.901525'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Alien Merchant Duties
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Alien Merchant Duties represent a socially constructed rule system that governs how foreign merchants can operate within domestic markets, functioning as a regulatory framework rather than a physical entity or process.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These duties operate as an audit and compliance mechanism that inspects and controls foreign merchant activities to ensure adherence to protectionist policies, fitting Beer's S3* function of monitoring and enforcement.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: ancient_system_of_political_economy
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: The Ancient System of Political Economy represents a socially constructed
|
||||
rule system and governance structure that organized economic activity around agricultural
|
||||
development as the foundation of national wealth.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This system operates at the policy level by defining the fundamental
|
||||
identity and purpose of economic organization, establishing agriculture as the ultimate
|
||||
authority for wealth creation before modern commercial systems emerged.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:49.015962'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Ancient System Of Political Economy
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Ancient System of Political Economy represents a socially constructed rule system and governance structure that organized economic activity around agricultural development as the foundation of national wealth.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This system operates at the policy level by defining the fundamental identity and purpose of economic organization, establishing agriculture as the ultimate authority for wealth creation before modern commercial systems emerged.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_coinage_expense_justification
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: This entity represents a structural dependency between government
|
||||
coinage operations and public expenditure, specifically the causal link that connects
|
||||
unnecessary public costs to the lack of proper seignorage mechanisms.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This justification operates within the audit function by examining
|
||||
the integrity and compliance of government coinage operations, specifically whether
|
||||
public expenditure on minting serves legitimate public purposes or represents wasteful
|
||||
subsidy.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:52.647161'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Coinage Expense Justification
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity represents a structural dependency between government coinage operations and public expenditure, specifically the causal link that connects unnecessary public costs to the lack of proper seignorage mechanisms.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This justification operates within the audit function by examining the integrity and compliance of government coinage operations, specifically whether public expenditure on minting serves legitimate public purposes or represents wasteful subsidy.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_consumption_of_goods
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Annual consumption of goods represents a flow or activity that occurs
|
||||
over time rather than something that exists independently, as it describes the ongoing
|
||||
process of using up produced goods within a year.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process represents the final stage of primary economic operations
|
||||
where the goods produced through agricultural labor, manufacturing, and trade are
|
||||
actually consumed by society.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:56.059406'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Consumption Of Goods
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Annual consumption of goods represents a flow or activity that occurs over time rather than something that exists independently, as it describes the ongoing process of using up produced goods within a year.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process represents the final stage of primary economic operations where the goods produced through agricultural labor, manufacturing, and trade are actually consumed by society.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_consumption_of_metals
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Annual consumption of metals is an ongoing activity involving the
|
||||
continuous use and depletion of precious metals through wear, damage, and industrial
|
||||
processes over time, making it a flow rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This consumption represents primary productive and industrial activities
|
||||
that physically transform and utilize precious metals as inputs in the real economy's
|
||||
operations.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:42:59.628828'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Consumption Of Metals
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Annual consumption of metals is an ongoing activity involving the continuous use and depletion of precious metals through wear, damage, and industrial processes over time, making it a flow rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This consumption represents primary productive and industrial activities that physically transform and utilize precious metals as inputs in the real economy's operations.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_importation_of_gold_and_silver_purposes
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: This represents an ongoing economic activity - the flow of importing
|
||||
precious metals for specific commercial purposes - rather than a static entity or
|
||||
abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process involves analyzing and understanding the environmental
|
||||
function of precious metals in facilitating foreign trade, which constitutes intelligence
|
||||
gathering about how the economic system adapts to international commerce needs.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:03.286972'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Importation Of Gold And Silver Purposes
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This represents an ongoing economic activity - the flow of importing precious metals for specific commercial purposes - rather than a static entity or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process involves analyzing and understanding the environmental function of precious metals in facilitating foreign trade, which constitutes intelligence gathering about how the economic system adapts to international commerce needs.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_industry_employed_in_production
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Annual Industry Employed in Production represents a measurable stock
|
||||
of productive capacity that exists as a persistent resource within the economic
|
||||
system, rather than being an activity or process itself.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity represents the fundamental productive operations that create
|
||||
commodities and bring them to market, which is the core function of S1 primary operations
|
||||
in Beer's model.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:06.707076'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Industry Employed In Production
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Annual Industry Employed in Production represents a measurable stock of productive capacity that exists as a persistent resource within the economic system, rather than being an activity or process itself.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity represents the fundamental productive operations that create commodities and bring them to market, which is the core function of S1 primary operations in Beer's model.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_plate_addition_estimation
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: Annual Plate Addition Estimation is a calculation activity with duration
|
||||
that transforms information about silver usage patterns rather than being a persistent
|
||||
entity that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This estimation serves as intelligence gathering that scans the environment
|
||||
to understand true silver demand patterns, enabling Smith to adapt his analysis
|
||||
of trade flows and challenge commonly held beliefs about import purposes.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:10.432191'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Plate Addition Estimation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Annual Plate Addition Estimation is a calculation activity with duration that transforms information about silver usage patterns rather than being a persistent entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This estimation serves as intelligence gathering that scans the environment to understand true silver demand patterns, enabling Smith to adapt his analysis of trade flows and challenge commonly held beliefs about import purposes.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_produce_of_land_and_labour
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: '"Annual Produce of Land and Labour" represents a measurable stock
|
||||
or output that exists as the tangible result of productive activities, making it
|
||||
a persistent entity rather than a process or abstract principle.'
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity represents the direct output of primary productive operations
|
||||
in agriculture and manufacturing, which are the core activities of S1 in Beer's
|
||||
viable system model.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:14.133757'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Produce Of Land And Labour
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
"Annual Produce of Land and Labour" represents a measurable stock or output that exists as the tangible result of productive activities, making it a persistent entity rather than a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity represents the direct output of primary productive operations in agriculture and manufacturing, which are the core activities of S1 in Beer's viable system model.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annual_surplus_of_gold_in_portugal
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: The annual surplus of gold in Portugal is a measurable stock or quantity
|
||||
that exists as a persistent economic reality resulting from Brazil's gold production
|
||||
exceeding domestic Portuguese demand.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This surplus gold serves as a key environmental factor that Smith analyzes
|
||||
to understand how natural resource endowments shape international trade patterns
|
||||
and commercial relationships, making it part of the intelligence system that scans
|
||||
and interprets external economic conditions.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:17.667615'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annual Surplus Of Gold In Portugal
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The annual surplus of gold in Portugal is a measurable stock or quantity that exists as a persistent economic reality resulting from Brazil's gold production exceeding domestic Portuguese demand.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This surplus gold serves as a key environmental factor that Smith analyzes to understand how natural resource endowments shape international trade patterns and commercial relationships, making it part of the intelligence system that scans and interprets external economic conditions.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: annuities_for_lives
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Annuities for lives are financial instruments that exist as persistent
|
||||
artifacts in the economic system, representing contractual obligations that can
|
||||
be bought, sold, and held independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These financial instruments function as tools for government resource
|
||||
allocation and operational control of public finances, serving as a mechanism for
|
||||
managing capital flows and debt obligations.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:20.914336'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Annuities For Lives
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Annuities for lives are financial instruments that exist as persistent artifacts in the economic system, representing contractual obligations that can be bought, sold, and held independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These financial instruments function as tools for government resource allocation and operational control of public finances, serving as a mechanism for managing capital flows and debt obligations.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: anticipation_of_taxes
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Anticipation of taxes is a financial activity with duration that involves
|
||||
the active borrowing against future revenues, representing something that happens
|
||||
rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This practice operates as a management function for resource allocation,
|
||||
allowing governments to control operational cash flow by accessing future tax receipts
|
||||
in advance of their natural collection timing.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:23.862340'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Anticipation Of Taxes
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Anticipation of taxes is a financial activity with duration that involves the active borrowing against future revenues, representing something that happens rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This practice operates as a management function for resource allocation, allowing governments to control operational cash flow by accessing future tax receipts in advance of their natural collection timing.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: apprenticeships
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Apprenticeships constitute a socially constructed rule system that
|
||||
governs the relationship between masters and apprentices, establishing formal procedures
|
||||
for trade entry and labor market participation.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Apprenticeships function as a coordination mechanism that regulates
|
||||
labor market signals by creating artificial barriers to entry that distort natural
|
||||
wage and competition patterns between trades.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:26.473659'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Apprenticeships
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Apprenticeships constitute a socially constructed rule system that governs the relationship between masters and apprentices, establishing formal procedures for trade entry and labor market participation.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Apprenticeships function as a coordination mechanism that regulates labor market signals by creating artificial barriers to entry that distort natural wage and competition patterns between trades.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificer_neighbourhood_settlement
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: This represents an ongoing activity of settlement formation and spatial
|
||||
organization that unfolds over time as craftsmen relocate and establish communities,
|
||||
rather than being a static entity that simply exists.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This settlement process constitutes a primary productive operation
|
||||
that creates the foundational economic infrastructure where skilled labor organizes
|
||||
itself spatially to serve agricultural communities and enable basic economic activity.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:30.579968'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificer Neighbourhood Settlement
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This represents an ongoing activity of settlement formation and spatial organization that unfolds over time as craftsmen relocate and establish communities, rather than being a static entity that simply exists.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This settlement process constitutes a primary productive operation that creates the foundational economic infrastructure where skilled labor organizes itself spatially to serve agricultural communities and enable basic economic activity.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificer_planter_independence
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: '"Artificer Planter Independence" appears to describe the process
|
||||
by which skilled craftsmen (artificers) and agricultural producers (planters) achieve
|
||||
economic autonomy, representing a transformation or activity rather than a static
|
||||
entity.'
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process involves the primary productive activities of both manufacturing
|
||||
(artificers) and agriculture (planters) achieving self-sufficiency, which are core
|
||||
S1 operations in the economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:34.557328'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificer Planter Independence
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
"Artificer Planter Independence" appears to describe the process by which skilled craftsmen (artificers) and agricultural producers (planters) achieve economic autonomy, representing a transformation or activity rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process involves the primary productive activities of both manufacturing (artificers) and agriculture (planters) achieving self-sufficiency, which are core S1 operations in the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificer_planter_transition
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: This entity describes an economic migration pattern and transformation
|
||||
activity where craftsmen abandon their trades to become agricultural producers,
|
||||
representing a flow or activity with duration rather than something that exists
|
||||
independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This transition represents a shift between primary productive activities
|
||||
from manufacturing to agricultural labor, which are the core operational activities
|
||||
that constitute S1 in the economic system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:38.084298'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificer Planter Transition
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity describes an economic migration pattern and transformation activity where craftsmen abandon their trades to become agricultural producers, representing a flow or activity with duration rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This transition represents a shift between primary productive activities from manufacturing to agricultural labor, which are the core operational activities that constitute S1 in the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificer_servant_status
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Artificer Servant Status represents a persistent social and economic
|
||||
position or condition that skilled craftsmen occupy, making it a stock-like entity
|
||||
that exists as a state of being rather than an activity or rule.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This status directly characterizes the condition of those engaged in
|
||||
primary productive activities (skilled craftsmanship), representing a fundamental
|
||||
aspect of the productive operations that generate economic value.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:42.054311'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificer Servant Status
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Artificer Servant Status represents a persistent social and economic position or condition that skilled craftsmen occupy, making it a stock-like entity that exists as a state of being rather than an activity or rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This status directly characterizes the condition of those engaged in primary productive activities (skilled craftsmanship), representing a fundamental aspect of the productive operations that generate economic value.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificers_and_retailers
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: "Artificers and retailers are persistent agents\u2014skilled craftsmen\
|
||||
\ and merchants who exist as independent economic actors providing specialized services\
|
||||
\ and goods to agricultural communities."
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These workers perform the primary productive operations of manufacturing
|
||||
and commerce, creating the essential goods and services that form the foundation
|
||||
of the local market economy.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:45.385560'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificers And Retailers
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Artificers and retailers are persistent agents—skilled craftsmen and merchants who exist as independent economic actors providing specialized services and goods to agricultural communities.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These workers perform the primary productive operations of manufacturing and commerce, creating the essential goods and services that form the foundation of the local market economy.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificial_direction_of_industry
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Artificial direction of industry is an ongoing governmental activity
|
||||
of forcing capital and labor into specific economic activities through various interventions,
|
||||
making it a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates as a management function where government authorities
|
||||
allocate resources and control operations by directing where capital and labor should
|
||||
be employed, which is the core function of S3 management systems.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:48.513265'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificial Direction Of Industry
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Artificial direction of industry is an ongoing governmental activity of forcing capital and labor into specific economic activities through various interventions, making it a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates as a management function where government authorities allocate resources and control operations by directing where capital and labor should be employed, which is the core function of S3 management systems.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificial_grasses
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Artificial grasses represent a tangible agricultural product or crop
|
||||
that exists as a stock or artifact within the economic system.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: As an agricultural product, artificial grasses belong to S1 primary
|
||||
operations which encompasses productive activities including agricultural labour
|
||||
and cultivation.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:52.056145'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificial Grasses
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Artificial grasses represent a tangible agricultural product or crop that exists as a stock or artifact within the economic system.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
As an agricultural product, artificial grasses belong to S1 primary operations which encompasses productive activities including agricultural labour and cultivation.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artificial_market_creation
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Artificial market creation is described as "human efforts to overcome
|
||||
natural market limitations through the construction of infrastructure," indicating
|
||||
an ongoing activity or transformation rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process involves strategic resource allocation decisions about
|
||||
where to build canals, roads, and ports to facilitate commerce, which falls under
|
||||
management's role of directing operational resources toward specific economic objectives.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:55.143885'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artificial Market Creation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Artificial market creation is described as "human efforts to overcome natural market limitations through the construction of infrastructure," indicating an ongoing activity or transformation rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process involves strategic resource allocation decisions about where to build canals, roads, and ports to facilitate commerce, which falls under management's role of directing operational resources toward specific economic objectives.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: artisan_specialisation
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S1
|
||||
type_rationale: Artisan specialisation is an ongoing activity of concentrating skilled
|
||||
workers on specific crafts that happens over time as markets develop, rather than
|
||||
being a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates within the primary productive activities layer
|
||||
where skilled craftsmen perform the fundamental work of manufacturing goods through
|
||||
their specialized trades.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:43:58.324610'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Artisan Specialisation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S1
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Artisan specialisation is an ongoing activity of concentrating skilled workers on specific crafts that happens over time as markets develop, rather than being a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates within the primary productive activities layer where skilled craftsmen perform the fundamental work of manufacturing goods through their specialized trades.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: assaying
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: Assaying is described as "the process of testing and determining the
|
||||
purity or fineness of metals," which clearly identifies it as an activity or transformation
|
||||
with duration rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Assaying functions as an audit mechanism that inspects and verifies
|
||||
the integrity of metal currency to ensure compliance with quality standards, which
|
||||
directly aligns with S3*'s role in inspection, compliance, and integrity verification.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:01.017051'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Assaying
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Assaying is described as "the process of testing and determining the purity or fineness of metals," which clearly identifies it as an activity or transformation with duration rather than something that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Assaying functions as an audit mechanism that inspects and verifies the integrity of metal currency to ensure compliance with quality standards, which directly aligns with S3*'s role in inspection, compliance, and integrity verification.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: assize_of_bread
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: The Assize of Bread is a socially constructed rule system that establishes
|
||||
legal regulations for price-setting, making it a governance structure rather than
|
||||
a physical entity or process.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: As a legal regulation that enforces compliance with fixed pricing rules
|
||||
based on wheat prices, the Assize of Bread functions as an audit mechanism ensuring
|
||||
adherence to prescribed standards.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:07.637005'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Assize Of Bread
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Assize of Bread is a socially constructed rule system that establishes legal regulations for price-setting, making it a governance structure rather than a physical entity or process.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
As a legal regulation that enforces compliance with fixed pricing rules based on wheat prices, the Assize of Bread functions as an audit mechanism ensuring adherence to prescribed standards.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: assize_of_bread_and_ale
|
||||
entity_type: Institution
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: The Assize of Bread and Ale represents a socially constructed rule
|
||||
system that governed price-setting mechanisms for essential commodities in medieval
|
||||
England.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This regulatory framework functioned as a coordination mechanism by
|
||||
establishing systematic price signals that adjusted bread and ale prices based on
|
||||
underlying grain market conditions to prevent price oscillations.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:03.808506'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Assize Of Bread And Ale
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Institution
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Assize of Bread and Ale represents a socially constructed rule system that governed price-setting mechanisms for essential commodities in medieval England.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This regulatory framework functioned as a coordination mechanism by establishing systematic price signals that adjusted bread and ale prices based on underlying grain market conditions to prevent price oscillations.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: augmentation_of_coin_denomination
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: Augmentation of coin denomination is a legislative or administrative
|
||||
activity that unfolds over time to transform the nominal value of currency, making
|
||||
it a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This represents a fundamental policy decision by ultimate governmental
|
||||
authority about the nature and value of the monetary system, placing it squarely
|
||||
within the sovereign policy domain of S5.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:11.108406'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Augmentation Of Coin Denomination
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Augmentation of coin denomination is a legislative or administrative activity that unfolds over time to transform the nominal value of currency, making it a process rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This represents a fundamental policy decision by ultimate governmental authority about the nature and value of the monetary system, placing it squarely within the sovereign policy domain of S5.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: aulnagers
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: Aulnagers are public officials who exist as persistent institutional
|
||||
agents within the regulatory system, making them elements rather than processes
|
||||
or abstract principles.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Aulnagers perform inspection and certification functions to ensure
|
||||
compliance with quality standards, which is the core audit and integrity function
|
||||
of S3*.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:14.234340'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Aulnagers
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Aulnagers are public officials who exist as persistent institutional agents within the regulatory system, making them elements rather than processes or abstract principles.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Aulnagers perform inspection and certification functions to ensure compliance with quality standards, which is the core audit and integrity function of S3*.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: average_price_of_corn
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Average Price of Corn is a measurable economic artifact that exists
|
||||
as a persistent reference point derived from historical data, rather than being
|
||||
a process, relationship, or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: As a stable measure that serves as a reference point for understanding
|
||||
price trends and market signals, Average Price of Corn functions within the coordination
|
||||
system that manages price signals and anti-oscillation mechanisms.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:17.766267'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Average Price Of Corn
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Average Price of Corn is a measurable economic artifact that exists as a persistent reference point derived from historical data, rather than being a process, relationship, or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
As a stable measure that serves as a reference point for understanding price trends and market signals, Average Price of Corn functions within the coordination system that manages price signals and anti-oscillation mechanisms.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: balance_of_produce_and_consumption
|
||||
entity_type: Relation
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: The balance of produce and consumption represents a structural dependency
|
||||
between two key economic variables (production and consumption) that determines
|
||||
the direction of national capital accumulation.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This balance serves as a critical intelligence mechanism for understanding
|
||||
a nation's economic health and adaptation capacity, requiring environmental scanning
|
||||
to assess whether the economy is growing or contracting independent of trade flows.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:21.090032'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Balance Of Produce And Consumption
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Relation
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The balance of produce and consumption represents a structural dependency between two key economic variables (production and consumption) that determines the direction of national capital accumulation.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This balance serves as a critical intelligence mechanism for understanding a nation's economic health and adaptation capacity, requiring environmental scanning to assess whether the economy is growing or contracting independent of trade flows.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: balance_of_trade
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S4
|
||||
type_rationale: Balance of Trade is a measurable stock or state that exists as a quantifiable
|
||||
difference between exports and imports at any given time, making it a persistent
|
||||
entity rather than a process or relationship.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Balance of Trade serves as a key intelligence metric that governments
|
||||
and merchants use to scan and interpret their economic environment, particularly
|
||||
in assessing national economic performance relative to other countries.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:28.272680'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Balance Of Trade
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S4
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Balance of Trade is a measurable stock or state that exists as a quantifiable difference between exports and imports at any given time, making it a persistent entity rather than a process or relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Balance of Trade serves as a key intelligence metric that governments and merchants use to scan and interpret their economic environment, particularly in assessing national economic performance relative to other countries.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: balance_of_trade_doctrine
|
||||
entity_type: Principle
|
||||
vsm_system: S5
|
||||
type_rationale: The Balance of Trade Doctrine represents an abstract theoretical claim
|
||||
about how national prosperity is achieved through trade surpluses, functioning as
|
||||
a general rule that mercantilists applied across different economic contexts.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: "This doctrine operates at the policy level by defining national economic\
|
||||
\ identity and ultimate purpose\u2014specifically that a nation's fundamental goal\
|
||||
\ should be accumulating precious metals through favorable trade balances."
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:24.959522'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Balance Of Trade Doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Principle
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S5
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
The Balance of Trade Doctrine represents an abstract theoretical claim about how national prosperity is achieved through trade surpluses, functioning as a general rule that mercantilists applied across different economic contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This doctrine operates at the policy level by defining national economic identity and ultimate purpose—specifically that a nation's fundamental goal should be accumulating precious metals through favorable trade balances.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_capital_adequacy
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank Capital Adequacy is a measurable stock or condition that exists
|
||||
as a persistent attribute of banking institutions, representing the sufficiency
|
||||
of capital relative to risks rather than being a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This entity operates within S3 as it directly concerns the management
|
||||
and control of banking operations through adequate capital allocation and risk management
|
||||
to ensure institutional stability.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:31.802083'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Capital Adequacy
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Capital Adequacy is a measurable stock or condition that exists as a persistent attribute of banking institutions, representing the sufficiency of capital relative to risks rather than being a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This entity operates within S3 as it directly concerns the management and control of banking operations through adequate capital allocation and risk management to ensure institutional stability.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_capital_structure
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank Capital Structure is a persistent organizational configuration
|
||||
that exists as a tangible division of assets within banking institutions, making
|
||||
it a stock-like entity rather than a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This structure directly governs how banks allocate their resources
|
||||
between fixed and circulating capital, which is a core management function controlling
|
||||
operational capacity and lending ability.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:35.303579'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Capital Structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Capital Structure is a persistent organizational configuration that exists as a tangible division of assets within banking institutions, making it a stock-like entity rather than a process or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This structure directly governs how banks allocate their resources between fixed and circulating capital, which is a core management function controlling operational capacity and lending ability.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_circulation_limits
|
||||
entity_type: Principle
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank circulation limits represent an abstract economic law that governs
|
||||
the maximum sustainable amount of paper money in circulation, operating as an invariant
|
||||
rule across different banking contexts.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These limits function as a management control mechanism that regulates
|
||||
resource allocation in the monetary system, determining how much paper money can
|
||||
be issued without causing operational instability.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:38.533055'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Circulation Limits
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Principle
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank circulation limits represent an abstract economic law that governs the maximum sustainable amount of paper money in circulation, operating as an invariant rule across different banking contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These limits function as a management control mechanism that regulates resource allocation in the monetary system, determining how much paper money can be issued without causing operational instability.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_competition_effects
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank Competition Effects represents an ongoing activity of competitive
|
||||
interaction between banks that produces outcomes over time, rather than being a
|
||||
static entity or abstract principle.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates within S3 Management as it directly governs how
|
||||
banking resources are allocated and controlled through competitive pressures that
|
||||
enforce prudent operational practices.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:42.312468'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Competition Effects
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Competition Effects represents an ongoing activity of competitive interaction between banks that produces outcomes over time, rather than being a static entity or abstract principle.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates within S3 Management as it directly governs how banking resources are allocated and controlled through competitive pressures that enforce prudent operational practices.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_credit_allocation
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank Credit Allocation is described as "the process by which banks
|
||||
decide which borrowers and projects to finance," clearly indicating an ongoing activity
|
||||
with duration rather than a static entity.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates as a management function that controls resource
|
||||
allocation by directing capital flows throughout the economy, which is the core
|
||||
responsibility of S3 in Beer's model.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:44.823553'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Credit Allocation
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Credit Allocation is described as "the process by which banks decide which borrowers and projects to finance," clearly indicating an ongoing activity with duration rather than a static entity.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates as a management function that controls resource allocation by directing capital flows throughout the economy, which is the core responsibility of S3 in Beer's model.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_credit_cycles
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S2
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank Credit Cycles represents a recurring flow of credit expansion
|
||||
and contraction with duration over time, making it a process rather than a static
|
||||
entity or structural rule.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: These cycles function as coordination mechanisms that create oscillations
|
||||
in the economy through alternating periods of credit availability and restriction,
|
||||
which is precisely what S2 systems are designed to dampen through anti-oscillatory
|
||||
coordination.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:48.233654'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Credit Cycles
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S2
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Credit Cycles represents a recurring flow of credit expansion and contraction with duration over time, making it a process rather than a static entity or structural rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
These cycles function as coordination mechanisms that create oscillations in the economy through alternating periods of credit availability and restriction, which is precisely what S2 systems are designed to dampen through anti-oscillatory coordination.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_credit_extension
|
||||
entity_type: Process
|
||||
vsm_system: S3
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank credit extension is an ongoing activity involving the flow of
|
||||
credit through discounting bills, granting cash accounts, and issuing notes, rather
|
||||
than a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: This process operates as a management function that allocates financial
|
||||
resources and controls banking operations to facilitate trade within the economic
|
||||
system.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:51.456896'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Credit Extension
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Process
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank credit extension is an ongoing activity involving the flow of credit through discounting bills, granting cash accounts, and issuing notes, rather than a static entity that exists independently.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This process operates as a management function that allocates financial resources and controls banking operations to facilitate trade within the economic system.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: bank_credit_quality
|
||||
entity_type: Element
|
||||
vsm_system: S3*
|
||||
type_rationale: Bank Credit Quality is a measurable standard or characteristic that
|
||||
exists as an attribute of banking operations, representing something that can be
|
||||
assessed and maintained rather than a process or activity itself.
|
||||
vsm_rationale: Bank Credit Quality functions as an audit mechanism that ensures compliance
|
||||
with sound lending standards and maintains the integrity of the banking system through
|
||||
inspection of borrower quality and investment standards.
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-02-23T10:44:55.140960'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification: Bank Credit Quality
|
||||
|
||||
## Entity Type
|
||||
|
||||
Element
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM System
|
||||
|
||||
S3*
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Credit Quality is a measurable standard or characteristic that exists as an attribute of banking operations, representing something that can be assessed and maintained rather than a process or activity itself.
|
||||
|
||||
## VSM Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
Bank Credit Quality functions as an audit mechanism that ensures compliance with sound lending standards and maintains the integrity of the banking system through inspection of borrower quality and investment standards.
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user