Files
ops-warden/wiki/AccessRouting.md
tegwick 5bbb791f21 docs(WARDEN-WP-0014): T5 — assist-layer docs, security model, INTENT/SCOPE
- wiki/OperatorAccessAssist.md: warden access contract, conduit-vs-broker
  boundary, the three guardrails + catalog secret guard, lane semantics.
- AccessRouting.md: issue/route/assist roles; reconciled the anti-pattern
  table so the transparent conduit no longer contradicts it.
- credential-routing.md rule: added warden access + "standing broker
  forbidden, transparent --fetch sanctioned" anti-pattern.
- INTENT.md: pointer→assist charter extension. SCOPE.md: implemented
  list + Getting Oriented + maturity A4→A5 (Availability).
- history decision record for the proxy-mode choice and guardrails.

WP-0014 finished (T1–T5). 172 passed, lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 17:35:57 +02:00

9.0 KiB

Access Routing — what ops-warden answers

Date: 2026-06-18

ops-warden issues short-lived SSH certificates, routes every other credential need to the subsystem that owns it, and assists with obtaining it through the warden access front door. This page states that role plainly so it cannot be misread as a desk that wraps the platform.

  • What ops-warden executes: the SSH certificate lane only (warden sign, cert_command, ops-ssh-wrapper).
  • What ops-warden answers: where a credential need belongs and who owns it — pointing at the owner's docs, never restating their procedure.
  • What ops-warden assists with: warden access renders the exact auth/path/command for any need and, for exec_capable lanes, proxies the fetch as the caller — a transparent, policy-gated, audited conduit that holds, caches, and logs nothing.
  • What ops-warden never does: own a secret store, establish identity, decide policy, open tunnels, or deploy hosts. The assist conduit uses your identity and owns none of these. See OperatorAccessAssist.md.

For the worker-facing decision tree see CredentialRouting.md; for component literacy see NetKingdomSecurityMap.md. This page is the steward's statement of role and boundary.


Issue vs route

Need Subsystem ops-warden role Who acts
SSH cert for host/ops access (adm/agt/atm) ops-warden Issue (warden sign) ops-warden signs; worker uses cert
API key / DB cred / dynamic lease OpenBao Route — point at path Worker calls OpenBao
"May I perform action X?" flex-auth (+ Topaz PDP) Route — point at policy Worker/PEP calls flex-auth
Login / OIDC token / MFA key-cape / Keycloak Route — point at IAM Profile Worker authenticates
Object-storage STS / S3 creds net-kingdom + flex-auth + OpenBao Route — point at vending path Worker follows NK-WP-0007
SSH tunnel / port forward ops-bridge Route — supply cert_command ops-bridge opens tunnel
Host principal / force-command railiance-infra Route — point at Ansible infra deploys host
OpenBao cluster init / unseal railiance-platform Route — point at ceremony platform operates

Only the first row is something ops-warden executes. Every other row is a pointer: ops-warden names the owner and the doc, and the worker acts on the owning system directly.

Assist layer (warden access). For routed rows, ops-warden goes beyond the pointer: it renders the exact auth method, path template, and command, and — where the catalog marks a lane exec_capable (today: OpenBao secret reads, key-cape login) — proxies the call as the caller. This does not change ownership: the secret stays in OpenBao, the decision stays in flex-auth, the identity stays in key-cape. ops-warden is a transparent conduit using the caller's identity, never a custodian of the value. The boundary that keeps this sound is in OperatorAccessAssist.md#the-conduit-vs-broker-boundary.


Anti-patterns (not coming to ops-warden)

ops-warden does not own custody, identity, authorization, or transport — those belong to other subsystems. The assist layer (warden access) may proxy a call as the caller, but it never becomes the owner. Don't reach for a command that implies ownership:

Tempting command Why it's wrong Right path
warden secret / warden bao (as a store/vend) ops-warden owns no secret store and vends nothing OpenBao; to obtain as yourself, warden access <need> --fetch
warden login (as an identity owner) ops-warden does not establish identity key-cape / Keycloak; to run the login as yourself, warden access <login need> --fetch (login lane)
warden policy (as a decision) ops-warden does not decide authorization flex-auth makes the call; ops-warden only gates its own proxy on it
warden tunnel ops-warden does not manage transport ops-bridge

The distinction: a standing broker (warden's own secret-read token, a cache of values) is forbidden; a transparent conduit (warden access --fetch, caller's identity, nothing retained) is sanctioned. ops-warden authors step-by-step procedure for exactly one lane — SSH issuance — because it owns it. For everything else it carries a pointer (and, for exec_capable lanes, a conduit), not a fork of the owner's runbook. See the no-double-source rule in workplans/WARDEN-WP-0010-access-routing-charter.md and the conduit-vs-broker boundary in OperatorAccessAssist.md.


Routing lookup CLI (warden route)

Agents and operators query the pointer catalog directly instead of re-deriving routing from wiki prose. The command group is read-only — it never calls OpenBao, flex-auth, key-cape, or any other subsystem, and never returns secret material.

warden route list [--json] [--all] [--tag <keyword>]              # active-only unless --all
warden route list --stale [--stale-days 90] [--all] [--json]    # past review cadence
warden route show <id> [--json]                                 # owner + pointers; SSH adds steps
warden route find "<free text need>" [--json] [--all]             # rank by keyword overlap

Agent-oriented examples:

# "I need an API key" — find the owner, get a pointer, act there yourself
warden route find "openrouter api key" --json
warden route show openbao-api-key --json
#   → {"warden_executes": false, "next_action": "next action on `railiance-platform` — see `wiki/CredentialRouting.md#routing-table`"}

# The one lane ops-warden executes: SSH. `show` appends the authored steps + cert pattern.
warden route show ssh-cert-host-access --json
#   → {"warden_executes": true, "cert_command": "warden sign <actor> --pubkey <path>", "steps": [...]}

show on a routed (non-SSH) need always ends with "next action on <owner_repo> — see <wiki_ref>" and never implies ops-warden performed anything. Draft scenarios (owner path not yet shipped) are hidden unless --all.


Audience notes

  • Human operators read this page and CredentialRouting.md to choose the right subsystem, then follow that subsystem's own docs.
  • Agents / CI read the machine-readable routing catalog (registry/routing/catalog.yaml) via warden route (above) so routing does not have to be re-derived from wiki prose each session.
  • Same truth, two shapes: humans read the wiki; agents read the catalog. The catalog references wiki sections by anchor so the two cannot drift apart — a test (tests/test_routing.py) fails CI if any wiki_ref anchor stops resolving.

How this stays aligned

NetKingdom security architecture is canonical in net-kingdom. ops-warden tracks it: when canon changes, the wiki section is updated and the catalog pointer (wiki_ref + canon_ref) follows. ops-warden never overrides canon and never silently forks it.

Report drift via a custodian workplan or a State Hub message to ops-warden.


Drift review cadence

Every catalog entry carries a reviewed: date (YYYY-MM-DD) — the last time an ops-warden steward confirmed the pointer still matches net-kingdom canon and the owner repo's shipped path.

Cadence Action
Quarterly (default 90 days) Run warden route list --stale — reconcile every listed entry against canon
On canon change When net-kingdom security docs change, review affected canon_ref entries immediately
On owner ship When an owning repo merges a new OpenBao path or playbook, promote draftactive and bump reviewed
On agent confusion If warden route find misses a common query, add need_keywords or a playbook — do not restate owner procedure in the catalog

Stale check (operators and agents)

# Entries not reviewed in the last 90 days (default threshold)
warden route list --stale

# Include draft scenarios in the stale report
warden route list --stale --all

# Custom threshold (e.g. monthly review)
warden route list --stale --stale-days 30 --json

For each stale entry:

  1. Open canon_ref in net-kingdom — confirm ownership and vocabulary unchanged.
  2. Open wiki_ref in this repo — update the playbook section if canon moved.
  3. Confirm the owner path still exists (anti-stale rule: unshipped paths stay draft).
  4. Bump reviewed: in registry/routing/catalog.yaml to today's date.
  5. Run uv run pytest tests/test_routing.py — anchor resolution must still pass.

CI enforces structural drift (every wiki_ref anchor resolves; no-double-source rule). The quarterly cadence catches semantic drift CI cannot detect — canon moved but anchors still resolve.


See also

  • CredentialRouting.md — worker decision tree and routing table
  • NetKingdomSecurityMap.md — component literacy
  • INTENT.md — steward mission ("issue SSH, route the rest")
  • workplans/WARDEN-WP-0010-access-routing-charter.md — charter + no-double-source rule
  • net-kingdom/docs/platform-identity-security-architecture.md — platform canon