Delegate Gitea operations to forge
This commit is contained in:
16
INTENT.md
16
INTENT.md
@@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ a new archaeology exercise.
|
||||
> *Where we are going.*
|
||||
|
||||
To become the **canonical home for Railiance application workload releases** -
|
||||
the Helm values, Kubernetes manifests, registry enablement, app-level runbooks,
|
||||
smoke checks, and operator recipes that make user-facing services safe to ship
|
||||
on top of the platform.
|
||||
the Helm values, Kubernetes manifests, app-level runbooks, smoke checks, and
|
||||
operator recipes that make user-facing services safe to ship on top of the
|
||||
platform.
|
||||
|
||||
This means:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -82,10 +82,10 @@ down and mutate those layers to make an app work.
|
||||
An app release is healthy when probes, status checks, smoke tests, and operator
|
||||
evidence say it is healthy, not merely because manifests applied successfully.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Current Workload, Future Path
|
||||
### 6. App Workloads, Forge Consumers
|
||||
|
||||
Gitea and early application releases are current S5 workloads and learning
|
||||
surfaces. Their lessons should leave behind reusable deployment patterns that
|
||||
Applications consume forge artifacts without owning forge runtime state. Early
|
||||
application releases should leave behind reusable deployment patterns that
|
||||
survive future forge and app migrations.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ This layer is expected to evolve toward:
|
||||
* Stronger **image and package promotion** patterns
|
||||
* Clearer **backup, restore, and data ownership handoffs** with S3
|
||||
* More complete **smoke, migration, rollback, and observability** recipes
|
||||
* Cleaner separation between **current forge operation** and future forge
|
||||
migration paths
|
||||
* Cleaner consumption of **forge-owned artifacts and evidence** from app
|
||||
release runbooks
|
||||
* Self-evidencing, reviewable **application readiness** before promotion
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user