Author the repository's INTENT: the cluster runtime layer — turning hardened servers into a healthy, ready-to-use orchestration platform for workloads, configured to a consistent baseline and proven healthy before higher layers deploy onto it. Kept self-coherent and reference-free: describes this repository's own purpose at the abstract, stable level, with no external project or dependency-product references. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
124
INTENT.md
Normal file
124
INTENT.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
|||||||
|
# INTENT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> This file captures **why this repository exists**,
|
||||||
|
> the **direction it is moving toward**, and
|
||||||
|
> the **kind of system it is meant to become**.
|
||||||
|
> It is intentionally **aspirational and stable**, not a description of current implementation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## One-liner
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**The cluster runtime layer — turning hardened servers into a healthy, ready-to-use orchestration platform for workloads.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Why This Exists
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A hardened set of servers is not yet somewhere workloads can run.
|
||||||
|
Something must install and configure the **orchestration runtime** — its
|
||||||
|
scheduler, networking, ingress, admission controls, and the operators that
|
||||||
|
extend it — and then **prove the cluster is healthy**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Without a disciplined runtime layer:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* cluster configuration drifts between environments,
|
||||||
|
* extension and addon boundaries blur,
|
||||||
|
* and higher layers deploy onto an unproven runtime.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This layer exists to provide that runtime **consistently and verifiably**,
|
||||||
|
so the layers above can deploy onto a known-good cluster.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The Mission
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> *Where we are going.*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To become the **canonical home for the cluster runtime** — installation
|
||||||
|
and baseline configuration of the orchestrator, its networking and
|
||||||
|
ingress, admission controls, cluster-level operators and addons, and
|
||||||
|
runtime access — operated to a **verified-healthy** standard.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This means:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The runtime is configured to a **consistent baseline** every time
|
||||||
|
* Cluster health is **proven by tests**, not assumed
|
||||||
|
* Capabilities are extended through **operators and addons** behind clear
|
||||||
|
boundaries
|
||||||
|
* Runtime **access is managed and rotatable**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Core Principles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 1. Runtime, Not Workloads
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Provide the place where things run. Do not own the things that run there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 2. Healthy by Verification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Cluster health is demonstrated by smoke tests and checks, never assumed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 3. Consistent Baseline
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The runtime is brought up the same way every time, so environments stay
|
||||||
|
comparable and predictable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 4. Built on a Verified Substrate
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Assumes a converged, hardened foundation beneath it; it does not reach
|
||||||
|
down and reconfigure that foundation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 5. Extensible by Operators
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Cluster capabilities are added through operators and addons within clear
|
||||||
|
boundaries, not by ad-hoc mutation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 6. Managed Access
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Access to the runtime is controlled, auditable, and rotatable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What This Is (Conceptually)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This layer is:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* a **cluster runtime** layer
|
||||||
|
* an **orchestrator installation and configuration**
|
||||||
|
* a **networking, ingress, and admission** baseline
|
||||||
|
* a host for **cluster-level operators and addons**
|
||||||
|
* a **health-verification gate**
|
||||||
|
* **runtime access** management
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What This Is Not
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This layer is not:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* the infrastructure substrate beneath it
|
||||||
|
* a provider of shared, stateful platform services
|
||||||
|
* an application or business-capability provider
|
||||||
|
* an owner of the workloads it runs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is the **runtime an entire landscape's workloads depend on**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Direction of Evolution
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This layer is expected to evolve toward:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Stronger, continuous **health verification**
|
||||||
|
* Smoother, safer **runtime upgrades**
|
||||||
|
* Clearer **operator and addon** boundaries
|
||||||
|
* More robust **access rotation**
|
||||||
|
* Self-evidencing, **auditable** runtime state
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Guiding Question
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **How can the runtime an entire landscape's workloads depend on be made consistently healthy, upgradable, and trustworthy?**
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user