generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Capture native self-assessment improvement
This commit is contained in:
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# Self-Scoping Comparison: repo-scoping-challenger-run-1
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: `candidate_improvement`
|
||||
- Golden profile: `repo-scoping-golden-profile-v1`
|
||||
- Target repo: `repo-scoping`
|
||||
- Summary: Assessment covers the golden profile without known regression patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Missing Expected Capabilities
|
||||
- None
|
||||
|
||||
## Forbidden Native Capabilities Present
|
||||
- None
|
||||
|
||||
## Known Regression Patterns
|
||||
- None
|
||||
|
||||
## Misplaced Features
|
||||
- None
|
||||
|
||||
## Matched Expected Capabilities
|
||||
- Explore Dependency And Impact Graphs
|
||||
- Generate And Maintain SCOPE.md
|
||||
- Generate Reviewable Candidate Characteristics
|
||||
- Index Source Content With Provenance
|
||||
- Provide Scope Context To Downstream Agents
|
||||
- Register And Track Repositories
|
||||
- Review And Approve Candidate Characteristics
|
||||
- Scan Repositories Into Observed Facts
|
||||
- Search Compare And Export Approved Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Hints
|
||||
- Candidate appears better than the known golden checks.
|
||||
- Human or agentic review should still confirm source evidence quality.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user