generated from coulomb/repo-seed
added initial concept documents
This commit is contained in:
495
wiki/ProductRequirementsSpecificationV0.1.md
Normal file
495
wiki/ProductRequirementsSpecificationV0.1.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,495 @@
|
||||
ProductRequirementsSpecV0.1
|
||||
|
||||
*Repository Ability Registry Requirements*
|
||||
|
||||
# **Product Requirements Document (PRD)**
|
||||
|
||||
## **Repository Ability Registry (v0.1)**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 1. **Purpose**
|
||||
|
||||
The **Repository Ability Registry** provides a structured, inspectable orientation layer for code repositories by mapping them from **abilities → capabilities → features → implementation → evidence**.
|
||||
|
||||
It enables developers, architects, and agents to:
|
||||
|
||||
* understand what a repository is useful for
|
||||
* inspect how it implements that usefulness
|
||||
* compare repositories based on real functionality
|
||||
* search repositories using natural language
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. **Problem Statement**
|
||||
|
||||
Modern code repositories suffer from **orientation opacity**:
|
||||
|
||||
* usefulness is unclear from structure alone
|
||||
* README files are incomplete or misleading
|
||||
* functionality is scattered across code
|
||||
* reuse decisions rely on tribal knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
This results in:
|
||||
|
||||
* wasted time exploring repositories
|
||||
* duplicated work
|
||||
* poor architectural decisions
|
||||
* low reuse of existing assets
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 3. **Goals**
|
||||
|
||||
## 3.1 Primary Goal
|
||||
|
||||
> Enable users to **register a repository and understand its usefulness within minutes** via an inspectable ability map.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3.2 Secondary Goals
|
||||
|
||||
* enable **natural language search** across repositories
|
||||
* provide **traceability from abstraction to code**
|
||||
* establish a **foundation for proof-of-ability integration**
|
||||
* support both **human and agent interaction**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3.3 Non-Goals (v0.1)
|
||||
|
||||
* full automated benchmarking
|
||||
* advanced ontology enforcement
|
||||
* marketplace features
|
||||
* monetization features
|
||||
* full CI/CD integration
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 4. **Users**
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.1 Developer / Architect
|
||||
|
||||
* needs to find reusable functionality
|
||||
* needs to understand unfamiliar repos quickly
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.2 Repository Owner
|
||||
|
||||
* wants their repo to be understandable and discoverable
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.3 Registry Curator
|
||||
|
||||
* ensures quality and correctness of extracted data
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.4 Agent / Automation
|
||||
|
||||
* queries registry programmatically
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 5. **Core Concepts**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Ability = why the repository is useful
|
||||
Capability = what behavior it provides
|
||||
Feature = how the behavior is exposed/implemented
|
||||
Evidence = why the capability can be trusted
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 6. **Product Scope (MVP)**
|
||||
|
||||
## 6.1 Included
|
||||
|
||||
* repository registration
|
||||
* repository analysis (semi-automated)
|
||||
* ability/capability/feature extraction (assisted)
|
||||
* human review and correction
|
||||
* searchable registry
|
||||
* inspectable repository view
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6.2 Excluded
|
||||
|
||||
* automated full-code understanding engine
|
||||
* distributed indexing
|
||||
* deep static analysis
|
||||
* real-time synchronization
|
||||
* full dependency graph modeling
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 7. **Functional Requirements**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.1 Repository Registration
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-01
|
||||
|
||||
User can register a repository via Git URL.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-02
|
||||
|
||||
System validates repository access.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-03
|
||||
|
||||
System stores repository metadata.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.2 Repository Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-04
|
||||
|
||||
System clones or accesses repository contents.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-05
|
||||
|
||||
System extracts:
|
||||
|
||||
* languages
|
||||
* structure
|
||||
* interfaces (API, CLI, etc.)
|
||||
* documentation files
|
||||
* tests
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.3 Ability Extraction
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-06
|
||||
|
||||
System generates candidate abilities based on:
|
||||
|
||||
* README
|
||||
* documentation
|
||||
* examples
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-07
|
||||
|
||||
Each ability includes:
|
||||
|
||||
* name
|
||||
* description
|
||||
* confidence
|
||||
* source references
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.4 Capability Extraction
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-08
|
||||
|
||||
System identifies candidate capabilities from:
|
||||
|
||||
* modules
|
||||
* APIs
|
||||
* tests
|
||||
* code structure
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-09
|
||||
|
||||
Capabilities include:
|
||||
|
||||
* inputs
|
||||
* outputs
|
||||
* linked abilities
|
||||
* description
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.5 Feature Extraction
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-10
|
||||
|
||||
System identifies concrete features:
|
||||
|
||||
* endpoints
|
||||
* CLI commands
|
||||
* modules
|
||||
* configuration interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-11
|
||||
|
||||
Each feature includes:
|
||||
|
||||
* type
|
||||
* implementation location
|
||||
* linked capability
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.6 Evidence Linking
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-12
|
||||
|
||||
System identifies potential evidence:
|
||||
|
||||
* tests
|
||||
* examples
|
||||
* benchmarks
|
||||
* docs
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-13
|
||||
|
||||
User can manually attach evidence to capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.7 Review and Curation
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-14
|
||||
|
||||
User can review extracted abilities, capabilities, features.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-15
|
||||
|
||||
User can edit, delete, or merge entries.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-16
|
||||
|
||||
User can approve registry entry.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.8 Search
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-17
|
||||
|
||||
User can search using natural language.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-18
|
||||
|
||||
System maps queries to abilities/capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-19
|
||||
|
||||
Search results include:
|
||||
|
||||
* repository name
|
||||
* matching ability
|
||||
* matching capability
|
||||
* confidence
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.9 Inspection UI
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-20
|
||||
|
||||
User can view repository profile.
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-21
|
||||
|
||||
UI shows hierarchical structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Ability → Capability → Feature → Code
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-22
|
||||
|
||||
User can drill down to:
|
||||
|
||||
* feature details
|
||||
* code locations
|
||||
* evidence
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.10 API Access
|
||||
|
||||
### FR-23
|
||||
|
||||
System exposes API endpoints for:
|
||||
|
||||
* search
|
||||
* repository retrieval
|
||||
* capability lookup
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 8. **Non-Functional Requirements**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.1 Performance
|
||||
|
||||
* search results returned within < 2 seconds
|
||||
* repository analysis < 2 minutes for medium repos
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.2 Scalability
|
||||
|
||||
* support 100–1,000 repositories (MVP)
|
||||
* architecture allows later horizontal scaling
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.3 Usability
|
||||
|
||||
* repository can be registered in < 2 minutes
|
||||
* inspection view understandable within 1 minute
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.4 Extensibility
|
||||
|
||||
* schema versioned
|
||||
* ability to extend capability model later
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.5 Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
* analysis failures do not corrupt registry
|
||||
* partial results allowed
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 9. **Data Model (Simplified)**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
Repository:
|
||||
id
|
||||
name
|
||||
url
|
||||
description
|
||||
metadata
|
||||
|
||||
Ability:
|
||||
id
|
||||
name
|
||||
description
|
||||
confidence
|
||||
|
||||
Capability:
|
||||
id
|
||||
name
|
||||
description
|
||||
inputs
|
||||
outputs
|
||||
ability_refs
|
||||
|
||||
Feature:
|
||||
id
|
||||
name
|
||||
type
|
||||
location
|
||||
capability_refs
|
||||
|
||||
Evidence:
|
||||
id
|
||||
type
|
||||
reference
|
||||
capability_refs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 10. **User Experience**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10.1 Key Screens
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Repository Registration
|
||||
|
||||
* input URL
|
||||
* confirm metadata
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Analysis View
|
||||
|
||||
* detected structure
|
||||
* proposed abilities/capabilities/features
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Review Interface
|
||||
|
||||
* edit/approve entries
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Search Page
|
||||
|
||||
* natural language search
|
||||
* result list
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Repository Profile Page
|
||||
|
||||
* ability map
|
||||
* drill-down navigation
|
||||
* code links
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 11. **Success Metrics**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 11.1 Product Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
* time to understand a repository < 5 minutes
|
||||
* number of repositories indexed
|
||||
* number of successful searches
|
||||
* user engagement with inspection view
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 11.2 Qualitative Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
* “I understand what this repo does now”
|
||||
* “I found something reusable”
|
||||
* “This saved me time”
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 12. **Risks**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12.1 Extraction Quality Risk
|
||||
|
||||
* automated inference may be inaccurate
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:** human review required
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12.2 Over-Complexity Risk
|
||||
|
||||
* ontology becomes too heavy
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:** keep schema minimal in v0.1
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12.3 Adoption Risk
|
||||
|
||||
* users may not contribute metadata
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:** provide value via auto-analysis first
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 13. **Future Extensions**
|
||||
|
||||
* integration with CI/CD for live updates
|
||||
* ability benchmarking integration (ties back to GIL)
|
||||
* capability maturity scoring
|
||||
* dependency graph across repositories
|
||||
* marketplace / discovery layer
|
||||
* automated code reasoning agents
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 14. **Positioning**
|
||||
|
||||
> The Repository Ability Registry is the missing orientation layer between raw code and practical reuse—making repositories understandable, comparable, and actionable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
xxx
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user