Implement scope-derived candidate review infrastructure

workplans/RREG-WP-0018-agentic-hierarchy-and-intent-scope-review.md

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ abilities, and draft scope from facts, source-linked text, and existing
 
 ## Dataset Assessment
 
-The current `var/repo-scoping.sqlite3` dataset contains eight repositories. The
+The initial `var/repo-scoping.sqlite3` dataset contained eight repositories. The
 new non-repo-scoping repositories all completed analysis, but only
 `ops-warden` produced a candidate capability and feature. Railiance repos mostly
 produced one candidate ability, zero candidate capabilities, zero candidate
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Observed patterns:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T01
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "dd00a642-7c69-4ae2-b7ac-954c31a1c72a"
 ```
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T02
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "01eb03da-7a0e-4e22-ae2d-7596752d178e"
 ```
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T03
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "fd572f4d-d2f6-4c85-bbf5-f77829fd6e6a"
 ```
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T04
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "286d96e0-ec5a-4a55-bb50-62d20ab25830"
 ```
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T05
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "80bc671c-2361-47e5-8135-7c945de66437"
 ```
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T06
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: medium
 state_hub_task_id: "4b74a058-b759-42d2-a243-7134dd907093"
 ```
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 
 ```task
 id: RREG-WP-0018-T07
-status: todo
+status: in_progress
 priority: medium
 state_hub_task_id: "cd1a3c14-076b-42da-8319-48310a964611"
 ```
@@ -213,3 +213,30 @@ Acceptance criteria:
 - Dependency graph element counts are non-zero for repositories with facts.
 - The comparison report makes it easy to judge whether the new result is better
   than the previous sparse output.
+
+## Implementation Update
+
+Implemented the comparison and generation infrastructure needed to rerun the
+dataset:
+- Added `repo-scoping assess-dataset` to summarize latest runs by facts,
+  chunks, candidate/approved hierarchy counts, graph coverage, document
+  presence, and sparse-hierarchy quality issues.
+- Updated candidate generation so `SCOPE.md` one-liners and `Provided
+  Capabilities` blocks seed reviewable current-state abilities/capabilities,
+  while deterministic fact fallback now requires stronger configuration facts
+  and does not promote dependency-only repositories.
+- Added review-only `INTENT.md`/`SCOPE.md` API and UI draft views. Missing
+  `INTENT.md` now produces an ambitious draft derived from scope/candidates
+  without writing the file.
+- Added dependency graph fallback nodes/edges for candidate and draft
+  hierarchies so repos with facts no longer render empty just because approved
+  characteristics are absent.
+- Added transparent quality criteria for template contamination and
+  scope-vs-intent separation; deterministic gates can require review but do not
+  accept registry truth.
+
+The latest local assessment command currently sees nine repositories because
+`vantage-point` has been added. It still reports old sparse Railiance candidate
+counts because those stored analysis runs predate this implementation. T07 stays
+open until the affected repositories are rerun and compared against the sparse
+baseline.