generated from coulomb/repo-seed
New workplans
This commit is contained in:
196
workplans/RREG-WP-0006-rename-to-repo-scoping-and-integrate.md
Normal file
196
workplans/RREG-WP-0006-rename-to-repo-scoping-and-integrate.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "Rename to repo-scoping and Full Custodian Integration"
|
||||
domain: capabilities
|
||||
repo: repo-registry
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: foerster-capabilities
|
||||
created: "2026-04-30"
|
||||
updated: "2026-04-30"
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- CUST-WP-0034
|
||||
- RREG-WP-0005
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "9daccfee-bcfc-49c5-bf68-36ea8c205a09"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RREG-WP-0006 — Rename to repo-scoping + Full Custodian Integration
|
||||
|
||||
## Goal
|
||||
|
||||
Complete the identity shift from "repository ability registry" to "repository
|
||||
scoping service". The name `repo-registry` describes internal mechanics
|
||||
(registering repos); `repo-scoping` describes the utility value (establishing
|
||||
and maintaining repository scope). This rename follows naturally from the
|
||||
SCOPE.md generation feature (RREG-WP-0005) becoming the primary output.
|
||||
|
||||
After the rename: run the first full ecosystem SCOPE.md refresh using the
|
||||
new capability, validate all attached repos pass the updated DOI C5 checks,
|
||||
and clean up all references to the old name across the custodian ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
Depends on: CUST-WP-0034 (delegation infrastructure), RREG-WP-0005
|
||||
(SCOPE.md generation feature must exist before the rename makes sense)
|
||||
|
||||
## T01: Rename the Gitea repository
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "55341e24-f936-4c74-86e4-fa084ab4a25c"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In Gitea: Settings → Rename repository from `repo-registry` to `repo-scoping`.
|
||||
Gitea will set up a redirect from the old name automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
Then update the local checkout:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git -C /home/worsch/repo-registry remote set-url origin gitea-remote:coulomb/repo-scoping.git
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Verify the push path works:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git -C /home/worsch/repo-registry push --dry-run
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance: `git -C /home/worsch/repo-registry remote -v` shows the new URL;
|
||||
a dry-run push succeeds.
|
||||
|
||||
## T02: Update state-hub registration and repo path
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "8a803b12-d991-48c7-8640-8876320815b1"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Update the managed_repo record in the state-hub:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call `update_repo_path()` or PATCH `/repos/repo-registry/` to set the new
|
||||
slug `repo-scoping` and update `git_url` to the new Gitea URL.
|
||||
2. Run `make fix-consistency-here REPO_PATH=/home/worsch/repo-registry` so
|
||||
the consistency checker re-registers the host path under the new slug.
|
||||
3. Rename the local directory (optional — the directory name is not canonical,
|
||||
only the git remote URL matters):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mv /home/worsch/repo-registry /home/worsch/repo-scoping
|
||||
```
|
||||
If the directory is renamed, also update any absolute paths that reference
|
||||
`/home/worsch/repo-registry` in CLAUDE.md files, settings, and scripts.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance: `GET /repos/repo-scoping/` returns the managed repo record;
|
||||
`GET /repos/repo-registry/` returns 404; `make fix-consistency` reports no
|
||||
slug-mismatch issues.
|
||||
|
||||
## T03: Update all references in the-custodian
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "4b630593-cfd7-4313-b774-5f7eeed819ec"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Search the-custodian for every occurrence of `repo-registry` that refers to
|
||||
this repository (not the generic concept) and update to `repo-scoping`:
|
||||
|
||||
- `canon/` — project charter files, full_circle_map, concept seeds
|
||||
- `workplans/` — any workplan that names `repo-registry` as a dependency or
|
||||
provider repo in capability registrations
|
||||
- `state-hub/dashboard/src/docs/scope.md` — update cross-references or
|
||||
replace with a redirect note pointing to `repo-scoping/docs/scope-md-spec.md`
|
||||
- `agents/agent-scope-analyst.md` — provider repo reference updated in
|
||||
CUST-WP-0034-T04; verify it reflects the new name here
|
||||
- `~/.claude/projects/…/memory/MEMORY.md` and memory files — update entries
|
||||
that name `repo-registry` as the capabilities domain repo
|
||||
- `CLAUDE.md` (global and project) — if `repo-registry` appears as an example
|
||||
or reference
|
||||
|
||||
Update the capability registrations (registered in CUST-WP-0034-T03):
|
||||
PATCH `/capabilities/scope.generate` and `/capabilities/scope.update` to set
|
||||
`provider_repo: repo-scoping`.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance: `grep -r "repo-registry" /home/worsch/the-custodian/` returns no
|
||||
hits that refer to this repository (hits inside this workplan file are
|
||||
acceptable as historical references).
|
||||
|
||||
## T04: Run first full ecosystem SCOPE.md refresh
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "3f25317f-5d4e-464c-8c76-80f61d6724d3"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For every registered repo that has a local path available on this host:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `GET /repos/{slug}/scope/diff` — inspect whether SCOPE.md is absent,
|
||||
stub-only, or genuinely stale
|
||||
2. For repos where `needs_update: true` or SCOPE.md is absent: issue
|
||||
`POST /repos/{slug}/scope/write` to generate and write the file
|
||||
3. For repos where the SCOPE.md is curator-owned text that should not be
|
||||
overwritten wholesale: review the diff and apply only the sections flagged
|
||||
as `stale` or `missing`, leaving curator-owned sections untouched
|
||||
|
||||
Priority order for the refresh:
|
||||
1. Repos with no SCOPE.md at all (C5a fail)
|
||||
2. Repos with a stub SCOPE.md and no approved characteristics (flag for
|
||||
analysis in repo-scoping first)
|
||||
3. Repos with approved characteristics but stale SCOPE.md (C5b/C5c warn)
|
||||
|
||||
Log each write as a progress event on the custodian workstream.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance: `make check-doi` across all reachable repos reports no C5a
|
||||
failures; C5b/C5c warns are reduced to repos genuinely awaiting curator input.
|
||||
|
||||
## T05: Validate full DoI C5 pass and run consistency sync
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006-T05
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "860bbc02-c7f4-46cd-9898-41d3454c3ea5"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
After T04:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `make ingest-capabilities-all` to refresh the capability catalog from
|
||||
all updated SCOPE.md files.
|
||||
2. Run `make fix-consistency REPO=repo-scoping` to sync workplan task statuses
|
||||
to the DB.
|
||||
3. Run `make check-doi` for the custodian and repo-scoping and confirm both
|
||||
pass C5a/b/c.
|
||||
4. Verify the dashboard "Repo DoI" page reflects the updated scores.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance: no C5a failures ecosystem-wide; the DoI summary endpoint at
|
||||
`GET /repos/doi/summary` shows improved aggregate C5 scores compared to
|
||||
pre-workplan baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
## T06: Update SCOPE.md for repo-scoping itself
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RREG-WP-0006-T06
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "1f5ecca9-1c73-4f30-b0e7-4a065146deeb"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
After the rename, regenerate `SCOPE.md` for repo-scoping to reflect:
|
||||
- New name in the one-liner and core idea
|
||||
- Updated "In Scope" to lead with SCOPE.md generation as the primary output
|
||||
- Updated "Provided Capabilities" blocks (scope.generate, scope.update added
|
||||
in RREG-WP-0005-T05 now appear)
|
||||
- "Related / Overlapping" referencing the-custodian as the coordination layer
|
||||
|
||||
Run the generator against itself:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
POST /repos/repo-scoping/scope/write
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then review and apply any curator-owned sections manually.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance: `SCOPE.md` at repo root passes all three C5a/b/c checks; the
|
||||
one-liner accurately describes the repo-scoping utility.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user