Add quality gate override flow

This commit is contained in:
2026-05-15 16:30:58 +02:00
parent d4f363af72
commit effea4d0d6
8 changed files with 278 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ def _split_audit_list(value: str) -> list[str]:
def _reviewer_type(action: str) -> str:
if action == "quality_gate_override":
return "human"
if action.startswith("agentic_"):
return "agent"
if action == "trusted_auto_approve_candidate_graph":
@@ -152,6 +154,8 @@ def _decision_kind(action: str) -> str:
return "downgraded"
if "request_human_review" in action:
return "needs_human"
if "override" in action:
return "override"
if "propose_edit" in action:
return "proposed_edit"
if "relink" in action:

View File

@@ -313,6 +313,37 @@ class RegistryService:
"review without approving registry truth."
)
def record_quality_gate_override(
self,
repository_id: int,
analysis_run_id: int,
*,
criterion_id: str,
element_type: str,
element_id: int,
reason: str,
notes: str = "",
) -> ReviewDecision:
if not reason.strip():
raise ValueError("quality gate override requires a reason")
decision_id = self.store.create_review_decision(
repository_id,
analysis_run_id,
action="quality_gate_override",
notes=(
f"criteria_version={active_quality_criteria_version()}; "
f"criteria={criterion_id}; "
f"target={element_type}:{element_id}; "
f"rationale={reason.strip()}; "
f"notes={notes.strip()}"
).strip(),
)
return next(
decision
for decision in self.list_review_decisions(repository_id, analysis_run_id)
if decision.id == decision_id
)
def _generate_candidates(
self,
repository: Repository,

View File

@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ from repo_registry.web_api.schemas import (
IdResponse,
ObservedFactResponse,
QualityCriteriaRegistryResponse,
QualityGateOverrideCreate,
RepositoryAbilityMapResponse,
RepositoryComparisonResponse,
RepositoryCreate,
@@ -471,6 +472,29 @@ def list_analysis_run_review_decisions(
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=str(exc)) from exc
@app.post(
"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{analysis_run_id}/quality-gate-overrides",
tags=["review"],
response_model=ReviewDecisionResponse,
)
def create_quality_gate_override(
repository_id: int,
analysis_run_id: int,
payload: QualityGateOverrideCreate,
service: RegistryService = Depends(get_service),
) -> dict[str, object]:
try:
return asdict(
service.record_quality_gate_override(
repository_id,
analysis_run_id,
**payload.model_dump(),
)
)
except (NotFoundError, ValueError) as exc:
raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=str(exc)) from exc
@app.get(
"/repos/{repository_id}/observed-facts",
tags=["analysis"],

View File

@@ -566,6 +566,14 @@ class QualityCriteriaRegistryResponse(BaseModel):
criteria: list[QualityCriterionResponse]
class QualityGateOverrideCreate(BaseModel):
criterion_id: str
element_type: str
element_id: int
reason: str
notes: str = ""
class ObservedFactResponse(BaseModel):
id: int
repository_id: int

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ from urllib.parse import quote_plus, urlparse
from fastapi import APIRouter, Depends, Form, HTTPException, Query
from fastapi.responses import HTMLResponse, PlainTextResponse, RedirectResponse
from repo_registry.acceptance import (
evaluate_candidate_graph_quality,
quality_gate_outcome_dicts,
)
from repo_registry.core.service import RegistryService
from repo_registry.self_scoping.comparison import compare_assessment_to_golden
from repo_registry.self_scoping.review_store import (
@@ -2018,6 +2022,10 @@ def analysis_run_detail(
display_name = repository_display_name(repository)
candidate_graph = service.candidate_graph(repository_id, analysis_run_id)
candidate_graph_data = asdict(candidate_graph)
quality_gate_outcomes = quality_gate_outcome_dicts(
evaluate_candidate_graph_quality(candidate_graph)
)
candidate_graph_data["quality_gate_outcomes"] = quality_gate_outcomes
facts = service.list_observed_facts(repository_id, analysis_run_id)
chunks = service.list_content_chunks(repository_id, analysis_run_id)
decisions = service.list_review_decisions(repository_id, analysis_run_id)
@@ -2070,6 +2078,12 @@ def analysis_run_detail(
</form>
</div>
{render_candidate_graph(candidate_graph_data, repository_id, analysis_run_id)}
<h2>Quality Gate Outcomes</h2>
{render_quality_gate_outcomes(
quality_gate_outcomes,
repository_id=repository_id,
analysis_run_id=analysis_run_id,
)}
</section>
<section class="panel">
<div class="actions">
@@ -2139,6 +2153,32 @@ def create_expectation_gap_from_form(
)
@router.post("/ui/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{analysis_run_id}/quality-gate-overrides")
def create_quality_gate_override_from_form(
repository_id: int,
analysis_run_id: int,
criterion_id: str = Form(...),
element_type: str = Form(...),
element_id: int = Form(...),
reason: str = Form(...),
notes: str = Form(""),
service: RegistryService = Depends(get_service),
) -> RedirectResponse:
service.record_quality_gate_override(
repository_id,
analysis_run_id,
criterion_id=criterion_id,
element_type=element_type,
element_id=element_id,
reason=reason,
notes=notes,
)
return RedirectResponse(
f"/ui/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{analysis_run_id}",
status_code=303,
)
@router.post("/ui/repos/{repository_id}/expectation-gaps")
def create_repository_expectation_gap_from_form(
repository_id: int,
@@ -4731,6 +4771,45 @@ def render_review_decisions(decisions: list) -> str:
"""
def render_quality_gate_outcomes(
outcomes: list[dict],
*,
repository_id: int,
analysis_run_id: int,
) -> str:
if not outcomes:
return '<p class="muted">No quality gates fired for this run.</p>'
rows = "\n".join(
f"""
<tr>
<td><span class="pill">{escape(outcome["criterion_id"])}</span></td>
<td>{escape(outcome["outcome"])}</td>
<td>{escape(outcome["element_type"])} #{outcome["element_id"]}</td>
<td>{escape(outcome["reason"])}</td>
<td>
<form class="stack" method="post" action="/ui/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{analysis_run_id}/quality-gate-overrides">
<input type="hidden" name="criterion_id" value="{escape(outcome["criterion_id"])}">
<input type="hidden" name="element_type" value="{escape(outcome["element_type"])}">
<input type="hidden" name="element_id" value="{outcome["element_id"]}">
<input name="reason" required placeholder="Override reason">
<input name="notes" placeholder="Optional notes">
<button class="secondary" type="submit">Override</button>
</form>
</td>
</tr>
"""
for outcome in outcomes
)
return f"""
<table>
<thead>
<tr><th>Criterion</th><th>Outcome</th><th>Element</th><th>Reason</th><th>Override</th></tr>
</thead>
<tbody>{rows}</tbody>
</table>
"""
def render_expectation_gap_form(
*,
action: str,

View File

@@ -164,3 +164,18 @@ def test_analysis_records_deterministic_gate_review_decision(tmp_path):
assert gate_decision.criteria_version == "repo-scoping-quality-criteria/v1"
assert "without approving registry truth" in gate_decision.rationale
assert service.ability_map(repository.id).abilities == []
override = service.record_quality_gate_override(
repository.id,
summary.analysis_run.id,
criterion_id="RREG-QC-002",
element_type="capability",
element_id=10,
reason="Curator confirmed this repo now owns provider routing.",
notes="Future criteria update may be needed.",
)
assert override.action == "quality_gate_override"
assert override.reviewer_type == "human"
assert override.decision_kind == "override"
assert override.criterion_ids == ["RREG-QC-002"]
assert override.rationale == "Curator confirmed this repo now owns provider routing."

View File

@@ -135,6 +135,62 @@ def test_quality_criteria_api_lists_active_registry():
)
def test_quality_gate_override_api_records_auditable_override(tmp_path):
source = tmp_path / "provider-repo"
source.mkdir()
(source / "README.md").write_text("# Provider Repo\n", encoding="utf-8")
(source / "providers.py").write_text(
"provider_registry = {'openrouter': OpenRouterAdapter}\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
database_path = str(tmp_path / "quality-gate.sqlite3")
def override_settings():
return Settings(
database_path=database_path,
checkout_root=str(tmp_path / "checkouts"),
)
app.dependency_overrides[get_settings] = override_settings
client = TestClient(app)
try:
repository_response = client.post(
"/repos",
json={"name": "Provider Repo", "url": str(source)},
)
repository_id = repository_response.json()["id"]
run_response = client.post(
f"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs",
json={"use_llm_assistance": False},
)
run_id = run_response.json()["analysis_run"]["id"]
graph_response = client.get(
f"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{run_id}/candidate-graph"
)
outcome = graph_response.json()["quality_gate_outcomes"][0]
override_response = client.post(
f"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{run_id}/quality-gate-overrides",
json={
"criterion_id": outcome["criterion_id"],
"element_type": outcome["element_type"],
"element_id": outcome["element_id"],
"reason": "Curator inspected source and accepts this exception.",
"notes": "Track for criteria refinement.",
},
)
assert override_response.status_code == 200
override = override_response.json()
assert override["action"] == "quality_gate_override"
assert override["reviewer_type"] == "human"
assert override["decision_kind"] == "override"
assert override["criterion_ids"] == [outcome["criterion_id"]]
assert override["rationale"].startswith("Curator inspected source")
finally:
app.dependency_overrides.clear()
def test_openapi_contract_snapshot_for_stable_agent_paths():
client = TestClient(app)
@@ -276,6 +332,9 @@ def test_openapi_contract_snapshot_for_stable_agent_paths():
"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{analysis_run_id}/review-decisions": {
"get": {"tags": ["review"], "success_schema": "list[ReviewDecisionResponse]"}
},
"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{analysis_run_id}/quality-gate-overrides": {
"post": {"tags": ["review"], "success_schema": "ReviewDecisionResponse"}
},
"/repos/{repository_id}/analysis-runs/{base_analysis_run_id}/diff/{target_analysis_run_id}": {
"get": {"tags": ["review"], "success_schema": "AnalysisRunDiffResponse"}
},
@@ -2107,6 +2166,57 @@ def test_ui_register_and_explore_lands_on_analysis_result(tmp_path):
app.dependency_overrides.clear()
def test_ui_quality_gate_outcomes_can_be_overridden(tmp_path):
source = tmp_path / "provider-ui"
source.mkdir()
(source / "README.md").write_text("# Provider UI\n", encoding="utf-8")
(source / "providers.py").write_text(
"provider_registry = {'openrouter': OpenRouterAdapter}\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
def override_settings():
return Settings(
database_path=str(tmp_path / "ui-quality-gates.sqlite3"),
checkout_root=str(tmp_path / "ui-quality-gates-checkouts"),
)
app.dependency_overrides[get_settings] = override_settings
client = TestClient(app)
try:
repository = client.post(
"/repos",
json={"name": "Provider UI", "url": str(source)},
).json()
run = client.post(
f"/ui/repos/{repository['id']}/analysis-runs",
data={"source_path": "", "use_llm_assistance": ""},
follow_redirects=False,
)
detail = client.get(run.headers["location"])
assert detail.status_code == 200
assert "Quality Gate Outcomes" in detail.text
assert "RREG-QC-002" in detail.text
override = client.post(
f"/ui/repos/{repository['id']}/analysis-runs/1/quality-gate-overrides",
data={
"criterion_id": "RREG-QC-002",
"element_type": "capability",
"element_id": "1",
"reason": "Curator accepts this exception.",
"notes": "Review criteria later.",
},
follow_redirects=False,
)
assert override.status_code == 303
updated = client.get(override.headers["location"])
assert "quality_gate_override" in updated.text
assert "Curator accepts this exception." in updated.text
finally:
app.dependency_overrides.clear()
def test_rebuild_characteristics_endpoint_dry_run_and_confirm(tmp_path):
source = tmp_path / "rebuild-api"
source.mkdir()

View File

@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ outcome counts, criteria version, and a rationale that no approval was applied.
```task
id: RREG-WP-0014-T06
status: todo
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "bcba3237-fb87-4a38-8e96-12b872d5e6a9"
```
@@ -220,6 +220,12 @@ Acceptance criteria:
- The UI makes it clear when a candidate is blocked by formal criteria versus
merely awaiting judgement.
Implementation note 2026-05-15: added quality-gate outcome rendering to the
analysis-run UI, a reviewer override form with required rationale, a
`quality_gate_override` review decision path in service/API/UI, and audit fields
that make overrides searchable through review decisions. Criteria changes remain
versioned in `docs/quality-criteria` and linked through workplan notes.
## T07: Regression Coverage For Acceptance Boundary
```task